Cargando…
Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
Biometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5864003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29565989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194111 |
_version_ | 1783308470939811840 |
---|---|
author | Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon Lunerti, Chiara Sanchez-Reillo, Raul Guest, Richard Michael |
author_facet | Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon Lunerti, Chiara Sanchez-Reillo, Raul Guest, Richard Michael |
author_sort | Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristics of biometrics are transparency, reliability and ease-of-use, however, the question of whether biometric recognition is as intuitive and straightforward to use is open to debate. Can biometric systems make some tasks easier for people with accessibility concerns? To investigate this question, an accessibility evaluation of a mobile app was conducted where test subjects withdraw money from a fictitious ATM (Automated Teller Machine) scenario. The biometric authentication mechanisms used include face, voice, and fingerprint. Furthermore, we employed traditional modalities of PIN and pattern in order to check if biometric recognition is indeed a real improvement. The trial test subjects within this work were people with real-life accessibility concerns. A group of people without accessibility concerns also participated, providing a baseline performance. Experimental results are presented concerning performance, HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) and accessibility, grouped according to category of accessibility concern. Our results reveal links between individual modalities and user category establishing guidelines for future accessible biometric products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5864003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58640032018-03-28 Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon Lunerti, Chiara Sanchez-Reillo, Raul Guest, Richard Michael PLoS One Research Article Biometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristics of biometrics are transparency, reliability and ease-of-use, however, the question of whether biometric recognition is as intuitive and straightforward to use is open to debate. Can biometric systems make some tasks easier for people with accessibility concerns? To investigate this question, an accessibility evaluation of a mobile app was conducted where test subjects withdraw money from a fictitious ATM (Automated Teller Machine) scenario. The biometric authentication mechanisms used include face, voice, and fingerprint. Furthermore, we employed traditional modalities of PIN and pattern in order to check if biometric recognition is indeed a real improvement. The trial test subjects within this work were people with real-life accessibility concerns. A group of people without accessibility concerns also participated, providing a baseline performance. Experimental results are presented concerning performance, HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) and accessibility, grouped according to category of accessibility concern. Our results reveal links between individual modalities and user category establishing guidelines for future accessible biometric products. Public Library of Science 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5864003/ /pubmed/29565989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194111 Text en © 2018 Blanco-Gonzalo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon Lunerti, Chiara Sanchez-Reillo, Raul Guest, Richard Michael Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title | Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title_full | Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title_fullStr | Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title_short | Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
title_sort | biometrics: accessibility challenge or opportunity? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5864003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29565989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blancogonzaloramon biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity AT lunertichiara biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity AT sanchezreilloraul biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity AT guestrichardmichael biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity |