Cargando…

Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: A number of researchers have reported that vasectomy is a risk factor for testicular cancer. However, this conclusion is inconsistent with a number of other published articles. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess whether vasectomy increases the risk of testicular cancer. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Haifeng, Deng, Tuo, Chen, Yiwen, Zhao, Zhijian, Wen, Yaoan, Chen, Yeda, Li, Xiaohang, Zeng, Guohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5864054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194606
_version_ 1783308483674767360
author Duan, Haifeng
Deng, Tuo
Chen, Yiwen
Zhao, Zhijian
Wen, Yaoan
Chen, Yeda
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
author_facet Duan, Haifeng
Deng, Tuo
Chen, Yiwen
Zhao, Zhijian
Wen, Yaoan
Chen, Yeda
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
author_sort Duan, Haifeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A number of researchers have reported that vasectomy is a risk factor for testicular cancer. However, this conclusion is inconsistent with a number of other published articles. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess whether vasectomy increases the risk of testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all related studies by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from January 01, 1980 to June 01, 2017. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to assess all included non-randomized studies. Summarized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the difference in outcomes between case and control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. RESULTS: A total of eight studies (2176 testicular cancer patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Six articles were case-control studies, and two were cohort studies. The pooled estimate of the OR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93–1.30) based on the eight studies in a fixed effects model. Two subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. The results were consistent with the overall findings. Publication bias was detected by Begg’s test and Egger’s test and p values > 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that there was no association between vasectomy and the development of testicular cancer. More high-quality studies are warranted to further explore the association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5864054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58640542018-03-28 Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Duan, Haifeng Deng, Tuo Chen, Yiwen Zhao, Zhijian Wen, Yaoan Chen, Yeda Li, Xiaohang Zeng, Guohua PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: A number of researchers have reported that vasectomy is a risk factor for testicular cancer. However, this conclusion is inconsistent with a number of other published articles. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess whether vasectomy increases the risk of testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all related studies by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from January 01, 1980 to June 01, 2017. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to assess all included non-randomized studies. Summarized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the difference in outcomes between case and control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. RESULTS: A total of eight studies (2176 testicular cancer patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Six articles were case-control studies, and two were cohort studies. The pooled estimate of the OR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93–1.30) based on the eight studies in a fixed effects model. Two subgroup analyses were performed according to the study design and country. The results were consistent with the overall findings. Publication bias was detected by Begg’s test and Egger’s test and p values > 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that there was no association between vasectomy and the development of testicular cancer. More high-quality studies are warranted to further explore the association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer. Public Library of Science 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5864054/ /pubmed/29566037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194606 Text en © 2018 Duan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duan, Haifeng
Deng, Tuo
Chen, Yiwen
Zhao, Zhijian
Wen, Yaoan
Chen, Yeda
Li, Xiaohang
Zeng, Guohua
Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort association between vasectomy and risk of testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5864054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194606
work_keys_str_mv AT duanhaifeng associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dengtuo associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyiwen associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaozhijian associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenyaoan associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyeda associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiaohang associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zengguohua associationbetweenvasectomyandriskoftesticularcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis