Cargando…

Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods

BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang Chul, Sim, Da Woon, Lee, Jongsun, Jeong, Kyoung Yong, Park, Kyung Hee, Lee, Jae-Hyun, Kim, Jung Dong, Park, Jung-Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101
_version_ 1783308607873351680
author Lee, Sang Chul
Sim, Da Woon
Lee, Jongsun
Jeong, Kyoung Yong
Park, Kyung Hee
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Jung Dong
Park, Jung-Won
author_facet Lee, Sang Chul
Sim, Da Woon
Lee, Jongsun
Jeong, Kyoung Yong
Park, Kyung Hee
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Jung Dong
Park, Jung-Won
author_sort Lee, Sang Chul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test. RESULTS: Diagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen(®) SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Prolagen(®) inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58650532018-03-27 Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods Lee, Sang Chul Sim, Da Woon Lee, Jongsun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Jung Dong Park, Jung-Won J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test. RESULTS: Diagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen(®) SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Prolagen(®) inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5865053/ /pubmed/29573248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Sang Chul
Sim, Da Woon
Lee, Jongsun
Jeong, Kyoung Yong
Park, Kyung Hee
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Jung Dong
Park, Jung-Won
Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title_full Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title_fullStr Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title_short Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
title_sort comparison between newly developed and commercial inhalant skin prick test reagents using in vivo and in vitro methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangchul comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT simdawoon comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT leejongsun comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT jeongkyoungyong comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT parkkyunghee comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT leejaehyun comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT kimjungdong comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods
AT parkjungwon comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods