Cargando…
Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods
BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101 |
_version_ | 1783308607873351680 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sang Chul Sim, Da Woon Lee, Jongsun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Jung Dong Park, Jung-Won |
author_facet | Lee, Sang Chul Sim, Da Woon Lee, Jongsun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Jung Dong Park, Jung-Won |
author_sort | Lee, Sang Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test. RESULTS: Diagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen(®) SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Prolagen(®) inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5865053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58650532018-03-27 Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods Lee, Sang Chul Sim, Da Woon Lee, Jongsun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Jung Dong Park, Jung-Won J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: We developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products. METHODS: We produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test. RESULTS: Diagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen(®) SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Prolagen(®) inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5865053/ /pubmed/29573248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Sang Chul Sim, Da Woon Lee, Jongsun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Jung Dong Park, Jung-Won Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title | Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title_full | Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title_short | Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods |
title_sort | comparison between newly developed and commercial inhalant skin prick test reagents using in vivo and in vitro methods |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesangchul comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT simdawoon comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT leejongsun comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT jeongkyoungyong comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT parkkyunghee comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT leejaehyun comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT kimjungdong comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods AT parkjungwon comparisonbetweennewlydevelopedandcommercialinhalantskinpricktestreagentsusinginvivoandinvitromethods |