Cargando…

A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task

Judgement bias tasks are promising tools to assess emotional valence in animals, however current designs are often time-consuming and lack aspects of validity. This study aimed to establish an improved design that addresses these issues and can be used across species. Horses, rats, and mice were tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hintze, Sara, Melotti, Luca, Colosio, Simona, Bailoo, Jeremy D., Boada-Saña, Maria, Würbel, Hanno, Murphy, Eimear
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3
_version_ 1783308638365941760
author Hintze, Sara
Melotti, Luca
Colosio, Simona
Bailoo, Jeremy D.
Boada-Saña, Maria
Würbel, Hanno
Murphy, Eimear
author_facet Hintze, Sara
Melotti, Luca
Colosio, Simona
Bailoo, Jeremy D.
Boada-Saña, Maria
Würbel, Hanno
Murphy, Eimear
author_sort Hintze, Sara
collection PubMed
description Judgement bias tasks are promising tools to assess emotional valence in animals, however current designs are often time-consuming and lack aspects of validity. This study aimed to establish an improved design that addresses these issues and can be used across species. Horses, rats, and mice were trained on a spatial Go/No-go task where animals could initiate each trial. The location of an open goal-box, at either end of a row of five goal-boxes, signalled either reward (positive trial) or non-reward (negative trial). Animals first learned to approach the goal-box in positive trials (Go) and to re-initiate/not approach in negative trials (No-go). Animals were then tested for responses to ambiguous trials where goal-boxes at intermediate locations were opened. The Go:No-go response ratio was used as a measure of judgement bias. Most animals quickly learned the Go/No-go discrimination and performed trials at a high rate compared to previous studies. Subjects of all species reliably discriminated between reference cues and ambiguous cues, demonstrating a monotonic graded response across the different cue locations, with no evidence of learning about the outcome of ambiguous trials. This novel test protocol is an important step towards a practical task for comparative studies on judgement biases in animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58651892018-03-27 A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task Hintze, Sara Melotti, Luca Colosio, Simona Bailoo, Jeremy D. Boada-Saña, Maria Würbel, Hanno Murphy, Eimear Sci Rep Article Judgement bias tasks are promising tools to assess emotional valence in animals, however current designs are often time-consuming and lack aspects of validity. This study aimed to establish an improved design that addresses these issues and can be used across species. Horses, rats, and mice were trained on a spatial Go/No-go task where animals could initiate each trial. The location of an open goal-box, at either end of a row of five goal-boxes, signalled either reward (positive trial) or non-reward (negative trial). Animals first learned to approach the goal-box in positive trials (Go) and to re-initiate/not approach in negative trials (No-go). Animals were then tested for responses to ambiguous trials where goal-boxes at intermediate locations were opened. The Go:No-go response ratio was used as a measure of judgement bias. Most animals quickly learned the Go/No-go discrimination and performed trials at a high rate compared to previous studies. Subjects of all species reliably discriminated between reference cues and ambiguous cues, demonstrating a monotonic graded response across the different cue locations, with no evidence of learning about the outcome of ambiguous trials. This novel test protocol is an important step towards a practical task for comparative studies on judgement biases in animals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5865189/ /pubmed/29572529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hintze, Sara
Melotti, Luca
Colosio, Simona
Bailoo, Jeremy D.
Boada-Saña, Maria
Würbel, Hanno
Murphy, Eimear
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title_full A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title_fullStr A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title_full_unstemmed A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title_short A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
title_sort cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial go/no-go task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hintzesara acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT melottiluca acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT colosiosimona acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT bailoojeremyd acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT boadasanamaria acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT wurbelhanno acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT murphyeimear acrossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT hintzesara crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT melottiluca crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT colosiosimona crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT bailoojeremyd crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT boadasanamaria crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT wurbelhanno crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask
AT murphyeimear crossspeciesjudgementbiastaskintegratingactivetrialinitiationintoaspatialgonogotask