Cargando…

Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds

BACKGROUND: Genomic selection can be applied to select purebreds for crossbred performance (CP). The average performance of crossbreds can be considered as the summation of two components, i.e. the breed average (BA) of the parental breeds and heterosis (H) present in crossbreds. Selection of pure b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esfandyari, Hadi, Berg, Peer, Sørensen, Anders Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0379-9
_version_ 1783308670987141120
author Esfandyari, Hadi
Berg, Peer
Sørensen, Anders Christian
author_facet Esfandyari, Hadi
Berg, Peer
Sørensen, Anders Christian
author_sort Esfandyari, Hadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic selection can be applied to select purebreds for crossbred performance (CP). The average performance of crossbreds can be considered as the summation of two components, i.e. the breed average (BA) of the parental breeds and heterosis (H) present in crossbreds. Selection of pure breeds for CP based on genomic estimated breeding values for crossbred performance (GEBV-C) or for purebred performance (GEBV-P) may differ in their ability to exploit BA and H and can affect the merit of crossbreds in both the short and long term. Selection based on GEBV-C is beneficial for CP, because H in crossbreds is efficiently exploited, whereas selection on GEBV-P results in more genetic progress in pure breeds, which increases the BA component of CP. To investigate the outcome of selection on GEBV-C and GEBV-P in both the short and long term, a two-way crossbreeding program was simulated to test the following hypotheses: (1) does selection on GEBV-P result in higher long-term CP compared to selection on GEBV-C and (2) does selection on a combination of GEBV-P and GEBV-C lead to more long-term gain in CP than selection on either separately. METHODS: We investigated the performance of crossbreds in a two-way crossbreeding program across 40 generations and considered different criteria to select purebred parents that ranged from selection on purebred performance to selection for CP with different weights on genomic evaluations based on purebred and CP. These criteria were compared under three genetic models to investigate the effects of the amount of dominance variance, absence of over-dominance, and the structure of the reference population on CP, both in the short and long term. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although beneficial in the short to medium term, genomic selection in pure breeds on a criterion that specifically targets CP was inferior to selection for purebred performance in the long term. A selection criterion that maximizes a combination of short- and long-term responses in CP, should improve the components that define crossbred merit (i.e., BA and H) simultaneously. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-018-0379-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58653672018-03-27 Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds Esfandyari, Hadi Berg, Peer Sørensen, Anders Christian Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic selection can be applied to select purebreds for crossbred performance (CP). The average performance of crossbreds can be considered as the summation of two components, i.e. the breed average (BA) of the parental breeds and heterosis (H) present in crossbreds. Selection of pure breeds for CP based on genomic estimated breeding values for crossbred performance (GEBV-C) or for purebred performance (GEBV-P) may differ in their ability to exploit BA and H and can affect the merit of crossbreds in both the short and long term. Selection based on GEBV-C is beneficial for CP, because H in crossbreds is efficiently exploited, whereas selection on GEBV-P results in more genetic progress in pure breeds, which increases the BA component of CP. To investigate the outcome of selection on GEBV-C and GEBV-P in both the short and long term, a two-way crossbreeding program was simulated to test the following hypotheses: (1) does selection on GEBV-P result in higher long-term CP compared to selection on GEBV-C and (2) does selection on a combination of GEBV-P and GEBV-C lead to more long-term gain in CP than selection on either separately. METHODS: We investigated the performance of crossbreds in a two-way crossbreeding program across 40 generations and considered different criteria to select purebred parents that ranged from selection on purebred performance to selection for CP with different weights on genomic evaluations based on purebred and CP. These criteria were compared under three genetic models to investigate the effects of the amount of dominance variance, absence of over-dominance, and the structure of the reference population on CP, both in the short and long term. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although beneficial in the short to medium term, genomic selection in pure breeds on a criterion that specifically targets CP was inferior to selection for purebred performance in the long term. A selection criterion that maximizes a combination of short- and long-term responses in CP, should improve the components that define crossbred merit (i.e., BA and H) simultaneously. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-018-0379-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5865367/ /pubmed/29566647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0379-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Esfandyari, Hadi
Berg, Peer
Sørensen, Anders Christian
Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title_full Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title_fullStr Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title_full_unstemmed Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title_short Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
title_sort balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29566647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0379-9
work_keys_str_mv AT esfandyarihadi balancedselectiononpurebredandcrossbredperformanceincreasesgainincrossbreds
AT bergpeer balancedselectiononpurebredandcrossbredperformanceincreasesgainincrossbreds
AT sørensenanderschristian balancedselectiononpurebredandcrossbredperformanceincreasesgainincrossbreds