Cargando…

Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia

Early-onset preeclampsia is associated with severe maternal and perinatal complications. The fullPIERS model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) showed both internal and external validities for predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 48 hours for women admitted with preeclampsia at any ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ukah, U. Vivian, Payne, Beth, Hutcheon, Jennifer A., Ansermino, J. Mark, Ganzevoort, Wessel, Thangaratinam, Shakila, Magee, Laura A., von Dadelszen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10318
_version_ 1783308691337904128
author Ukah, U. Vivian
Payne, Beth
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Ansermino, J. Mark
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Thangaratinam, Shakila
Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
author_facet Ukah, U. Vivian
Payne, Beth
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Ansermino, J. Mark
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Thangaratinam, Shakila
Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
author_sort Ukah, U. Vivian
collection PubMed
description Early-onset preeclampsia is associated with severe maternal and perinatal complications. The fullPIERS model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) showed both internal and external validities for predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 48 hours for women admitted with preeclampsia at any gestational age. This ability to recognize women at the highest risk of complications earlier could aid in preventing these adverse outcomes through improved management. Because the majority (≈70%) of the women in the model development had late-onset preeclampsia, we assessed the performance of the fullPIERS model in women with early-onset preeclampsia to determine whether it will be useful in this subgroup of women with preeclampsia. Three cohorts of women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia between 2012 and 2016, from tertiary hospitals in Canada, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom, were used. Using the published model equation, the probability of experiencing an adverse maternal outcome was calculated for each woman, and model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and stratification. The total data set included 1388 women, with an adverse maternal outcome rate of 7.3% within 48 hours of admission. The model had good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.75–0.86), and a calibration slope of 0.68. The estimated likelihood ratio at the predicted probability of ≥30% was 23.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.83–36.79), suggesting a strong evidence to rule in adverse maternal outcomes. The fullPIERS model will aid in identifying women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia in similar settings who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes, thereby allowing timely and effective interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58654952018-04-04 Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia Ukah, U. Vivian Payne, Beth Hutcheon, Jennifer A. Ansermino, J. Mark Ganzevoort, Wessel Thangaratinam, Shakila Magee, Laura A. von Dadelszen, Peter Hypertension Original Articles Early-onset preeclampsia is associated with severe maternal and perinatal complications. The fullPIERS model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) showed both internal and external validities for predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 48 hours for women admitted with preeclampsia at any gestational age. This ability to recognize women at the highest risk of complications earlier could aid in preventing these adverse outcomes through improved management. Because the majority (≈70%) of the women in the model development had late-onset preeclampsia, we assessed the performance of the fullPIERS model in women with early-onset preeclampsia to determine whether it will be useful in this subgroup of women with preeclampsia. Three cohorts of women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia between 2012 and 2016, from tertiary hospitals in Canada, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom, were used. Using the published model equation, the probability of experiencing an adverse maternal outcome was calculated for each woman, and model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and stratification. The total data set included 1388 women, with an adverse maternal outcome rate of 7.3% within 48 hours of admission. The model had good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.75–0.86), and a calibration slope of 0.68. The estimated likelihood ratio at the predicted probability of ≥30% was 23.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.83–36.79), suggesting a strong evidence to rule in adverse maternal outcomes. The fullPIERS model will aid in identifying women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia in similar settings who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes, thereby allowing timely and effective interventions. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2018-04 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5865495/ /pubmed/29440330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10318 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Hypertension is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ukah, U. Vivian
Payne, Beth
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Ansermino, J. Mark
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Thangaratinam, Shakila
Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title_full Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title_fullStr Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title_short Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
title_sort assessment of the fullpiers risk prediction model in women with early-onset preeclampsia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10318
work_keys_str_mv AT ukahuvivian assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT paynebeth assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT hutcheonjennifera assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT anserminojmark assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT ganzevoortwessel assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT thangaratinamshakila assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT mageelauraa assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia
AT vondadelszenpeter assessmentofthefullpiersriskpredictionmodelinwomenwithearlyonsetpreeclampsia