Cargando…

Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Skin incision is considered to be placed at 90° in reference to the skin to get perfect wound edge adaptation. The incision on hair-bearing tissues, as the scalp, is considered to be bevelled at 45° to promote hair growth through the scar. There is no consensus about the preferred incisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feinendegen, Dominik L., Tremp, Mathias, Roldán, J. Camilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001684
_version_ 1783308770357542912
author Feinendegen, Dominik L.
Tremp, Mathias
Roldán, J. Camilo
author_facet Feinendegen, Dominik L.
Tremp, Mathias
Roldán, J. Camilo
author_sort Feinendegen, Dominik L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin incision is considered to be placed at 90° in reference to the skin to get perfect wound edge adaptation. The incision on hair-bearing tissues, as the scalp, is considered to be bevelled at 45° to promote hair growth through the scar. There is no consensus about the preferred incision angle on the brow. The aim of this article was to demonstrate the feasibility of the “flat incision technique” for brow repositioning, where brow deformation results after forehead reconstruction. A wound-healing model for the bevelled incision is presented. METHODS: Brow incisions are bevelled with an angle of 20°. The lower incision is placed inside the brow so that the upper 2 rows of hair are included; the dermis is completely transected and dissection is continued into the subdermal plane. The procedure is presented in a patient who underwent resection of the forehead due to melanoma. RESULTS: The bevelled incision increases the surface area of dermal layer by a factor of 2 compared with the standard vertical skin incision at 90°. Loss of the dermal tissue integrity and continuity due to trauma hinders the recovery of cell migration and function, resulting in a more prominent scar formation. It appears reasonable that with the increased surface area of the dermal layers in the wound edges, the scar quality improves. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of the procedure. CONCLUSION: The bevelled 20° incision for brow repositioning and reshaping showed to be a viable and predictable procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58659132018-04-03 Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation Feinendegen, Dominik L. Tremp, Mathias Roldán, J. Camilo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Skin incision is considered to be placed at 90° in reference to the skin to get perfect wound edge adaptation. The incision on hair-bearing tissues, as the scalp, is considered to be bevelled at 45° to promote hair growth through the scar. There is no consensus about the preferred incision angle on the brow. The aim of this article was to demonstrate the feasibility of the “flat incision technique” for brow repositioning, where brow deformation results after forehead reconstruction. A wound-healing model for the bevelled incision is presented. METHODS: Brow incisions are bevelled with an angle of 20°. The lower incision is placed inside the brow so that the upper 2 rows of hair are included; the dermis is completely transected and dissection is continued into the subdermal plane. The procedure is presented in a patient who underwent resection of the forehead due to melanoma. RESULTS: The bevelled incision increases the surface area of dermal layer by a factor of 2 compared with the standard vertical skin incision at 90°. Loss of the dermal tissue integrity and continuity due to trauma hinders the recovery of cell migration and function, resulting in a more prominent scar formation. It appears reasonable that with the increased surface area of the dermal layers in the wound edges, the scar quality improves. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of the procedure. CONCLUSION: The bevelled 20° incision for brow repositioning and reshaping showed to be a viable and predictable procedure. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5865913/ /pubmed/29616177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001684 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Feinendegen, Dominik L.
Tremp, Mathias
Roldán, J. Camilo
Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title_full Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title_fullStr Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title_short Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation
title_sort flat incision technique for reconstructive brow surgery: a wound healing model and clinical evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001684
work_keys_str_mv AT feinendegendominikl flatincisiontechniqueforreconstructivebrowsurgeryawoundhealingmodelandclinicalevaluation
AT trempmathias flatincisiontechniqueforreconstructivebrowsurgeryawoundhealingmodelandclinicalevaluation
AT roldanjcamilo flatincisiontechniqueforreconstructivebrowsurgeryawoundhealingmodelandclinicalevaluation