Cargando…

Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Although the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in implant-based reconstruction increases, there is a lack of studies evaluating patient-reported outcome measures after this reconstruction method. We aim to evaluate the patient satisfaction after ADM-assisted implant-based breast re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negenborn, Vera L., Dikmans, Rieky E. G., Bouman, Mark-Bram, Wilschut, Janneke A., Mullender, Margriet G., Salzberg, C. Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001654
_version_ 1783308773808406528
author Negenborn, Vera L.
Dikmans, Rieky E. G.
Bouman, Mark-Bram
Wilschut, Janneke A.
Mullender, Margriet G.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
author_facet Negenborn, Vera L.
Dikmans, Rieky E. G.
Bouman, Mark-Bram
Wilschut, Janneke A.
Mullender, Margriet G.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
author_sort Negenborn, Vera L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in implant-based reconstruction increases, there is a lack of studies evaluating patient-reported outcome measures after this reconstruction method. We aim to evaluate the patient satisfaction after ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) in 1 of the largest series of patients undergoing ADM-assisted IBBR. METHODS: Patients with ADM-assisted IBBR were invited to fill out the BREAST-Q, a validated and standardized questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction after a breast reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 208 patients (38.4%) responded and reported a mean satisfaction of 70.6 ± 20.2 with their breasts and 78.0 ± 20.5 with the outcome. An overall complication rate of 7.7% was noted, with 1.5% severe complications leading to hospital readmission (0.5%) and implant removal (0.5%). Patients with complications and unilateral reconstruction for oncological reasons reported overall less satisfaction rates compared with patients with bilateral, preventive surgery, and an uncomplicated postoperative course. Strongly related domains indicate the importance of patient satisfaction with their breasts and outcome on psychosocial and sexual functioning and satisfaction with information on satisfaction with breasts, outcome, and surgeon. CONCLUSION: There is an increased demand for patient-reported outcome measures in a changing practice to which the opinion of the patient assumes a larger role. With high satisfaction rates, ADM-assisted IBBR is a valuable reconstruction method, provided that complication rates remain low. Hence, it should only be performed in a selected group of women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58659272018-04-03 Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study Negenborn, Vera L. Dikmans, Rieky E. G. Bouman, Mark-Bram Wilschut, Janneke A. Mullender, Margriet G. Salzberg, C. Andrew Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Although the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in implant-based reconstruction increases, there is a lack of studies evaluating patient-reported outcome measures after this reconstruction method. We aim to evaluate the patient satisfaction after ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) in 1 of the largest series of patients undergoing ADM-assisted IBBR. METHODS: Patients with ADM-assisted IBBR were invited to fill out the BREAST-Q, a validated and standardized questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction after a breast reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 208 patients (38.4%) responded and reported a mean satisfaction of 70.6 ± 20.2 with their breasts and 78.0 ± 20.5 with the outcome. An overall complication rate of 7.7% was noted, with 1.5% severe complications leading to hospital readmission (0.5%) and implant removal (0.5%). Patients with complications and unilateral reconstruction for oncological reasons reported overall less satisfaction rates compared with patients with bilateral, preventive surgery, and an uncomplicated postoperative course. Strongly related domains indicate the importance of patient satisfaction with their breasts and outcome on psychosocial and sexual functioning and satisfaction with information on satisfaction with breasts, outcome, and surgeon. CONCLUSION: There is an increased demand for patient-reported outcome measures in a changing practice to which the opinion of the patient assumes a larger role. With high satisfaction rates, ADM-assisted IBBR is a valuable reconstruction method, provided that complication rates remain low. Hence, it should only be performed in a selected group of women. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5865927/ /pubmed/29616167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001654 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Negenborn, Vera L.
Dikmans, Rieky E. G.
Bouman, Mark-Bram
Wilschut, Janneke A.
Mullender, Margriet G.
Salzberg, C. Andrew
Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort patient-reported outcomes after adm-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001654
work_keys_str_mv AT negenbornveral patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy
AT dikmansriekyeg patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy
AT boumanmarkbram patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy
AT wilschutjannekea patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy
AT mullendermargrietg patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy
AT salzbergcandrew patientreportedoutcomesafteradmassistedimplantbasedbreastreconstructionacrosssectionalstudy