Cargando…

Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pafitanis, Georgios, Veljanoski, Damjan, Ghanem, Ali M., Myers, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674
_version_ 1783308774729056256
author Pafitanis, Georgios
Veljanoski, Damjan
Ghanem, Ali M.
Myers, Simon
author_facet Pafitanis, Georgios
Veljanoski, Damjan
Ghanem, Ali M.
Myers, Simon
author_sort Pafitanis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection. METHODS: An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model. RESULTS: Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection. CONCLUSIONS: The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58659312018-04-03 Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection Pafitanis, Georgios Veljanoski, Damjan Ghanem, Ali M. Myers, Simon Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Experimental BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer has evolved from muscle flaps to fasciocutaneous flaps. Dissection of the intramuscular course of feeding vessels is technically challenging. Simulation-based microsurgery skills acquisition is moving toward nonliving training models. Living porcine model or human cadavers are currently cost-ineffective methods for the early learning curve in teaching intramuscular dissection. The aim of this study was to validate an inexpensive ex vivo porcine model simulating harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap, specifically including perforator intramuscular dissection. METHODS: An initial needs analysis and anatomical dissections (characteristics of vascular anatomy) established the necessity and surgical design (step-by-step) of the ex vivo DIEAP flap harvesting model. A pilot study utilizing objective assessment methodology (time to complete flap raising and hand motion analysis) demonstrated the surgeons’ performance. A detailed feedback questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of this model. RESULTS: Fifty-seven participants completed the initial needs analysis. Fifteen pork bellies were dissected and the vascular anatomical characteristics of the inferior epigastric vessels are presented. Eight surgeons performed the step-by-step flap design demonstrating construct validity in flap raising and intramuscular dissection. All surgeons completed the ex vivo DIEAP harvesting and they recommend this model as the first step in training for intramuscular dissection. CONCLUSIONS: The pork belly simulation is a cheap, easy, ethically considerate, and high-fidelity simulation model for intramuscular dissection for the DIEAP free flap. This study guides future validation trials to explore if the absence of physiological blood flow affects skills acquisition in the intramuscular dissection learning curve. The pork belly could be the first step in perforators dissection before progressing to the in vivo porcine model. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5865931/ /pubmed/29616172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Experimental
Pafitanis, Georgios
Veljanoski, Damjan
Ghanem, Ali M.
Myers, Simon
Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_full Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_fullStr Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_short Pork Belly: A Simulation Training Model for Intramuscular Perforator Dissection
title_sort pork belly: a simulation training model for intramuscular perforator dissection
topic Experimental
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001674
work_keys_str_mv AT pafitanisgeorgios porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT veljanoskidamjan porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT ghanemalim porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection
AT myerssimon porkbellyasimulationtrainingmodelforintramuscularperforatordissection