Cargando…

Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Activity is increasingly being recognized as a highly relevant parameter in all areas of healthcare for diagnosis, treatment, or outcome assessment, especially in orthopaedics where the movement apparatus is directly affected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop, de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipperts, Matthijs, van Laarhoven, Simon, Senden, Rachel, Heyligers, Ide, Grimm, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2017.02.003
_version_ 1783308834904735744
author Lipperts, Matthijs
van Laarhoven, Simon
Senden, Rachel
Heyligers, Ide
Grimm, Bernd
author_facet Lipperts, Matthijs
van Laarhoven, Simon
Senden, Rachel
Heyligers, Ide
Grimm, Bernd
author_sort Lipperts, Matthijs
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Activity is increasingly being recognized as a highly relevant parameter in all areas of healthcare for diagnosis, treatment, or outcome assessment, especially in orthopaedics where the movement apparatus is directly affected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop, describe, and clinically validate a generic activity-monitoring algorithm, satisfying a combination of three criteria. The algorithm must be able to identify, count, and time a large set of relevant daily activities. It must be validated for orthopaedic patients as well as healthy individuals, and the validation must be in a setting that mimics free-living conditions. METHODS: Using various technical solutions, such as a dual-axis approach, dynamic inclinometry (hip flexion), and semiautomatic calibration (gait speed), the algorithms were designed to count and time the following postures, transfers, and activities of daily living: resting/sitting, standing, walking, ascending and descending stairs, sit–stand transitions, and cycling. In addition, the number of steps per walking bout was determined. Validation was performed with healthy individuals and patients who had undergone unilateral total joint arthroplasty, representing a wide spectrum of functional capacity. Video observation was used as the gold standard to count and time activities in a validation protocol approaching free-living conditions. RESULTS: In total 992 and 390 events (activities or postures) were recorded in the healthy group and patient group, respectively. The mean error varied between 0% and 2.8% for the healthy group and between 0% and 7.5% for the patient group. The error expressed in percentage of time varied between 2.0% and 3.0% for both groups. CONCLUSION: Activity monitoring of orthopaedic patients by counting and timing a large set of relevant daily life events is feasible in a user- and patient-friendly way and at high clinical validity using a generic three-dimensional accelerometer and algorithms based on empirical and physical methods. The algorithms performed well for healthy individuals as well as patients recovering after total joint replacement in a challenging validation set-up. With such a simple and transparent method real-life activity parameters can be collected in orthopaedic practice for diagnostics, treatments, outcome assessment, or biofeedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5866408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58664082018-04-16 Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients Lipperts, Matthijs van Laarhoven, Simon Senden, Rachel Heyligers, Ide Grimm, Bernd J Orthop Translat Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Activity is increasingly being recognized as a highly relevant parameter in all areas of healthcare for diagnosis, treatment, or outcome assessment, especially in orthopaedics where the movement apparatus is directly affected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop, describe, and clinically validate a generic activity-monitoring algorithm, satisfying a combination of three criteria. The algorithm must be able to identify, count, and time a large set of relevant daily activities. It must be validated for orthopaedic patients as well as healthy individuals, and the validation must be in a setting that mimics free-living conditions. METHODS: Using various technical solutions, such as a dual-axis approach, dynamic inclinometry (hip flexion), and semiautomatic calibration (gait speed), the algorithms were designed to count and time the following postures, transfers, and activities of daily living: resting/sitting, standing, walking, ascending and descending stairs, sit–stand transitions, and cycling. In addition, the number of steps per walking bout was determined. Validation was performed with healthy individuals and patients who had undergone unilateral total joint arthroplasty, representing a wide spectrum of functional capacity. Video observation was used as the gold standard to count and time activities in a validation protocol approaching free-living conditions. RESULTS: In total 992 and 390 events (activities or postures) were recorded in the healthy group and patient group, respectively. The mean error varied between 0% and 2.8% for the healthy group and between 0% and 7.5% for the patient group. The error expressed in percentage of time varied between 2.0% and 3.0% for both groups. CONCLUSION: Activity monitoring of orthopaedic patients by counting and timing a large set of relevant daily life events is feasible in a user- and patient-friendly way and at high clinical validity using a generic three-dimensional accelerometer and algorithms based on empirical and physical methods. The algorithms performed well for healthy individuals as well as patients recovering after total joint replacement in a challenging validation set-up. With such a simple and transparent method real-life activity parameters can be collected in orthopaedic practice for diagnostics, treatments, outcome assessment, or biofeedback. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5866408/ /pubmed/29662766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2017.02.003 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lipperts, Matthijs
van Laarhoven, Simon
Senden, Rachel
Heyligers, Ide
Grimm, Bernd
Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title_full Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title_fullStr Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title_short Clinical validation of a body-fixed 3D accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
title_sort clinical validation of a body-fixed 3d accelerometer and algorithm for activity monitoring in orthopaedic patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2017.02.003
work_keys_str_mv AT lippertsmatthijs clinicalvalidationofabodyfixed3daccelerometerandalgorithmforactivitymonitoringinorthopaedicpatients
AT vanlaarhovensimon clinicalvalidationofabodyfixed3daccelerometerandalgorithmforactivitymonitoringinorthopaedicpatients
AT sendenrachel clinicalvalidationofabodyfixed3daccelerometerandalgorithmforactivitymonitoringinorthopaedicpatients
AT heyligerside clinicalvalidationofabodyfixed3daccelerometerandalgorithmforactivitymonitoringinorthopaedicpatients
AT grimmbernd clinicalvalidationofabodyfixed3daccelerometerandalgorithmforactivitymonitoringinorthopaedicpatients