Cargando…
Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2 |
_version_ | 1783308881319952384 |
---|---|
author | Rangel, Frits A. Maal, Thomas J. J. de Koning, Martien J. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Bergé, Stefaan J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie |
author_facet | Rangel, Frits A. Maal, Thomas J. J. de Koning, Martien J. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Bergé, Stefaan J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie |
author_sort | Rangel, Frits A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. RESULTS: The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5866842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58668422018-03-27 Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study Rangel, Frits A. Maal, Thomas J. J. de Koning, Martien J. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Bergé, Stefaan J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. RESULTS: The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5866842/ /pubmed/28932947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rangel, Frits A. Maal, Thomas J. J. de Koning, Martien J. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Bergé, Stefaan J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title | Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title_full | Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title_fullStr | Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title_short | Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
title_sort | integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rangelfritsa integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy AT maalthomasjj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy AT dekoningmartienjj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy AT bronkhorstewaldm integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy AT bergestefaanj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy AT kuijpersjagtmanannemarie integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy |