Cargando…

Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study

OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rangel, Frits A., Maal, Thomas J. J., de Koning, Martien J. J., Bronkhorst, Ewald M., Bergé, Stefaan J., Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2
_version_ 1783308881319952384
author Rangel, Frits A.
Maal, Thomas J. J.
de Koning, Martien J. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Bergé, Stefaan J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
author_facet Rangel, Frits A.
Maal, Thomas J. J.
de Koning, Martien J. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Bergé, Stefaan J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
author_sort Rangel, Frits A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. RESULTS: The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5866842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58668422018-03-27 Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study Rangel, Frits A. Maal, Thomas J. J. de Koning, Martien J. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Bergé, Stefaan J. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. RESULTS: The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5866842/ /pubmed/28932947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rangel, Frits A.
Maal, Thomas J. J.
de Koning, Martien J. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Bergé, Stefaan J.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title_full Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title_fullStr Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title_full_unstemmed Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title_short Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
title_sort integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans—a clinical validation study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rangelfritsa integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy
AT maalthomasjj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy
AT dekoningmartienjj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy
AT bronkhorstewaldm integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy
AT bergestefaanj integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy
AT kuijpersjagtmanannemarie integrationofdigitaldentalcastsinconebeamcomputedtomographyscansaclinicalvalidationstudy