Cargando…

Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis

BACKGROUND: Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blumhardt, Gerhard, Haas, Matthias, Polte, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
_version_ 1783308885001502720
author Blumhardt, Gerhard
Haas, Matthias
Polte, Stefanie
author_facet Blumhardt, Gerhard
Haas, Matthias
Polte, Stefanie
author_sort Blumhardt, Gerhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemostasis. In this retrospective one-center clinical trial, the course of patients with extensive abdominal adhesiolysis and application of a recent starch-based formulation, 4DryField PH (4DF), is analyzed. CASE REPORT: Five female patients (age 65–83 years) underwent extensive open adhesiolysis with application of 4DF gel for adhesion prevention, premixed extracorporeally with saline or Ringer's solution (60–70 mL per 5 g 4DF) for homogeneous gel distribution on intestinal loops and in the peritoneal cavity. In addition, dry 4DF powder was dispersed on the greater omentum and subsequently transformed into a gel by dripping with saline or Ringer's solution directly before abdominal closure. Patients were followed up for more than two years, except for one patient who died after nine months due to metastases. One patient with complex situation due to Gore-Tex mesh in the lower abdomen showed no adhesions at scheduled second-look operation but after six months had relaparotomy for adhesiolysis. All other patients have remained free of adhesions or adhesion-related symptoms during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Considering the extent and complexity of adhesions, treatment with 4DF gel for adhesion prevention after open adhesiolysis appears promising. Prospective randomized trials should further elaborate on this clinical concept.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5866859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58668592018-04-30 Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis Blumhardt, Gerhard Haas, Matthias Polte, Stefanie Case Rep Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemostasis. In this retrospective one-center clinical trial, the course of patients with extensive abdominal adhesiolysis and application of a recent starch-based formulation, 4DryField PH (4DF), is analyzed. CASE REPORT: Five female patients (age 65–83 years) underwent extensive open adhesiolysis with application of 4DF gel for adhesion prevention, premixed extracorporeally with saline or Ringer's solution (60–70 mL per 5 g 4DF) for homogeneous gel distribution on intestinal loops and in the peritoneal cavity. In addition, dry 4DF powder was dispersed on the greater omentum and subsequently transformed into a gel by dripping with saline or Ringer's solution directly before abdominal closure. Patients were followed up for more than two years, except for one patient who died after nine months due to metastases. One patient with complex situation due to Gore-Tex mesh in the lower abdomen showed no adhesions at scheduled second-look operation but after six months had relaparotomy for adhesiolysis. All other patients have remained free of adhesions or adhesion-related symptoms during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Considering the extent and complexity of adhesions, treatment with 4DF gel for adhesion prevention after open adhesiolysis appears promising. Prospective randomized trials should further elaborate on this clinical concept. Hindawi 2018-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5866859/ /pubmed/29713558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742 Text en Copyright © 2018 Gerhard Blumhardt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Blumhardt, Gerhard
Haas, Matthias
Polte, Stefanie
Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_full Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_fullStr Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_short Effect of 4DryField(®) PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_sort effect of 4dryfield(®) ph, a novel adhesion barrier, on recurrence of intestinal adhesions after extensive visceral adhesiolysis
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
work_keys_str_mv AT blumhardtgerhard effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis
AT haasmatthias effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis
AT poltestefanie effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis