Cargando…

Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 years of radiographic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes in patients with recent onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving etanercept in a clinical trial (EMBARK) to similar patients not receiving biologics in a cohort study (DESIR). METHODS: Endpoints were changes at week...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dougados, Maxime, Maksymowych, Walter P, Landewé, Robert B M, Moltó, Anna, Claudepierre, Pascal, de Hooge, Manouk, Lambert, Robert G, Bonin, Randi, Bukowski, Jack F, Jones, Heather E, Logeart, Isabelle, Pedersen, Ron, Szumski, Annette, Vlahos, Bonnie, van der Heijde, Désirée
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212008
_version_ 1783308959285772288
author Dougados, Maxime
Maksymowych, Walter P
Landewé, Robert B M
Moltó, Anna
Claudepierre, Pascal
de Hooge, Manouk
Lambert, Robert G
Bonin, Randi
Bukowski, Jack F
Jones, Heather E
Logeart, Isabelle
Pedersen, Ron
Szumski, Annette
Vlahos, Bonnie
van der Heijde, Désirée
author_facet Dougados, Maxime
Maksymowych, Walter P
Landewé, Robert B M
Moltó, Anna
Claudepierre, Pascal
de Hooge, Manouk
Lambert, Robert G
Bonin, Randi
Bukowski, Jack F
Jones, Heather E
Logeart, Isabelle
Pedersen, Ron
Szumski, Annette
Vlahos, Bonnie
van der Heijde, Désirée
author_sort Dougados, Maxime
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 years of radiographic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes in patients with recent onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving etanercept in a clinical trial (EMBARK) to similar patients not receiving biologics in a cohort study (DESIR). METHODS: Endpoints were changes at week 104 per the modified New York (mNY) grading system in total SIJ score (primary endpoint) and net percentage of patients with progression defined three ways. Treatment effect was analysed with and without adjustment for baseline covariates. RESULTS: At 104 weeks, total SIJ score improved in the etanercept group (n=154, adjusted least-squares mean change: –0.14) and worsened in the control group (n=182, change: 0.08). The adjusted difference between groups (etanercept minus control) was –0.22 (95% CI –0.38 to –0.06), p=0.008. The net percentage of patients with progression was significantly lower in the etanercept versus the control group for two of three binary endpoints: –1.9% versus 1.6% (adjusted difference for etanercept minus control: –4.7%,95% CI –9.9 to 0.5, p=0.07) for change in mNY criteria; –1.9% versus 7.8% (adjusted difference: –18.2%,95% CI –30.9 to –5.6, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ; and –0.6% versus 6.7% (adjusted difference: –16.4%,95% CI –27.9 to –5.0, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ, with shift from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 considered no change. CONCLUSION: Despite the slow radiographic SIJ progression rate over 2 years in axSpA, this study suggests a lower rate of progression in the SIJ with etanercept than without anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01258738, NCT01648907; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58674112018-03-27 Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis Dougados, Maxime Maksymowych, Walter P Landewé, Robert B M Moltó, Anna Claudepierre, Pascal de Hooge, Manouk Lambert, Robert G Bonin, Randi Bukowski, Jack F Jones, Heather E Logeart, Isabelle Pedersen, Ron Szumski, Annette Vlahos, Bonnie van der Heijde, Désirée Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 years of radiographic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes in patients with recent onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving etanercept in a clinical trial (EMBARK) to similar patients not receiving biologics in a cohort study (DESIR). METHODS: Endpoints were changes at week 104 per the modified New York (mNY) grading system in total SIJ score (primary endpoint) and net percentage of patients with progression defined three ways. Treatment effect was analysed with and without adjustment for baseline covariates. RESULTS: At 104 weeks, total SIJ score improved in the etanercept group (n=154, adjusted least-squares mean change: –0.14) and worsened in the control group (n=182, change: 0.08). The adjusted difference between groups (etanercept minus control) was –0.22 (95% CI –0.38 to –0.06), p=0.008. The net percentage of patients with progression was significantly lower in the etanercept versus the control group for two of three binary endpoints: –1.9% versus 1.6% (adjusted difference for etanercept minus control: –4.7%,95% CI –9.9 to 0.5, p=0.07) for change in mNY criteria; –1.9% versus 7.8% (adjusted difference: –18.2%,95% CI –30.9 to –5.6, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ; and –0.6% versus 6.7% (adjusted difference: –16.4%,95% CI –27.9 to –5.0, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ, with shift from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 considered no change. CONCLUSION: Despite the slow radiographic SIJ progression rate over 2 years in axSpA, this study suggests a lower rate of progression in the SIJ with etanercept than without anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01258738, NCT01648907; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5867411/ /pubmed/28970213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212008 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Dougados, Maxime
Maksymowych, Walter P
Landewé, Robert B M
Moltó, Anna
Claudepierre, Pascal
de Hooge, Manouk
Lambert, Robert G
Bonin, Randi
Bukowski, Jack F
Jones, Heather E
Logeart, Isabelle
Pedersen, Ron
Szumski, Annette
Vlahos, Bonnie
van der Heijde, Désirée
Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title_full Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title_short Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
title_sort evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (embark trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (desir cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212008
work_keys_str_mv AT dougadosmaxime evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT maksymowychwalterp evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT landewerobertbm evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT moltoanna evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT claudepierrepascal evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT dehoogemanouk evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT lambertrobertg evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT boninrandi evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT bukowskijackf evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT jonesheathere evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT logeartisabelle evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT pedersenron evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT szumskiannette evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT vlahosbonnie evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis
AT vanderheijdedesiree evaluationofthechangeinstructuralradiographicsacroiliacjointdamageafter2yearsofetanercepttherapyembarktrialincomparisontoacontemporarycontrolcohortdesircohortinrecentonsetaxialspondyloarthritis