Cargando…

Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men’s collision sports such as rugby union is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attwood, Matthew J, Roberts, Simon P, Trewartha, Grant, England, Mike E, Stokes, Keith A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29055883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005
_version_ 1783308961206763520
author Attwood, Matthew J
Roberts, Simon P
Trewartha, Grant
England, Mike E
Stokes, Keith A
author_facet Attwood, Matthew J
Roberts, Simon P
Trewartha, Grant
England, Mike E
Stokes, Keith A
author_sort Attwood, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men’s collision sports such as rugby union is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men’s community rugby union players. METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected ‘normal practice’ exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises. Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries. RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40% reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60% reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60% reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58674212018-03-27 Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial Attwood, Matthew J Roberts, Simon P Trewartha, Grant England, Mike E Stokes, Keith A Br J Sports Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men’s collision sports such as rugby union is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men’s community rugby union players. METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected ‘normal practice’ exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises. Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries. RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40% reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60% reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60% reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03 2017-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5867421/ /pubmed/29055883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Attwood, Matthew J
Roberts, Simon P
Trewartha, Grant
England, Mike E
Stokes, Keith A
Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29055883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005
work_keys_str_mv AT attwoodmatthewj efficacyofamovementcontrolinjurypreventionprogrammeinadultmenscommunityrugbyunionaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertssimonp efficacyofamovementcontrolinjurypreventionprogrammeinadultmenscommunityrugbyunionaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trewarthagrant efficacyofamovementcontrolinjurypreventionprogrammeinadultmenscommunityrugbyunionaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT englandmikee efficacyofamovementcontrolinjurypreventionprogrammeinadultmenscommunityrugbyunionaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stokeskeitha efficacyofamovementcontrolinjurypreventionprogrammeinadultmenscommunityrugbyunionaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial