Cargando…

‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training

OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based communication skills training for health and social care professionals is essential to improve the care of seriously ill patients and their families. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported impact of ‘Difficult Conversations’, a multidisciplinary half-day interactive worksh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brighton, Lisa Jane, Selman, Lucy Ellen, Gough, Nicholas, Nadicksbernd, JJ, Bristowe, Katherine, Millington-Sanders, Catherine, Koffman, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447
_version_ 1783308962156773376
author Brighton, Lisa Jane
Selman, Lucy Ellen
Gough, Nicholas
Nadicksbernd, JJ
Bristowe, Katherine
Millington-Sanders, Catherine
Koffman, Jonathan
author_facet Brighton, Lisa Jane
Selman, Lucy Ellen
Gough, Nicholas
Nadicksbernd, JJ
Bristowe, Katherine
Millington-Sanders, Catherine
Koffman, Jonathan
author_sort Brighton, Lisa Jane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based communication skills training for health and social care professionals is essential to improve the care of seriously ill patients and their families. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported impact of ‘Difficult Conversations’, a multidisciplinary half-day interactive workshop, and gain feedback to inform future development and evaluation. METHODS: Service evaluation using questionnaire data collected before and immediately after workshops from February 2015 to August 2016 regarding participant self-assessed confidence, knowledge and skills. Qualitative free-text comments provided feedback about the workshop and were subjected to content analysis. RESULTS: Of 886 workshop participants, 655 completed baseline questionnaires and 714 postworkshop questionnaires; 550 were matched pairs. Participants were qualified or trainee general practitioners (34%), community nurses and care coordinators (32%), social care professionals (7%), care home staff (6%), advanced practice/specialist nurses (5%), care workers (5%) and allied health professionals (3%). All groups demonstrated significant increases in mean self-assessed confidence (2.46, 95% CI 2.41 to 2.51; to 3.20, 95% CI 3.17 to 3.24; P<0.001), knowledge (2.22, 95% CI 2.17 to 2.27; to 3.18, 95% CI 3.14 to 3.22; P<0.001) and skills (2.37, 95% CI 2.32 to 2.42; to 3.09, 95% CI 3.05 to 3.12; P<0.001). Qualitative findings showed participants valued role play, the communication framework acronym and opportunities for discussion. They commended workshop facilitators’ skills, the safe atmosphere and interprofessional learning. Suggested improvements included more prepared role play and greater coverage of the taught topics. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Difficult Conversations’ workshops were associated with improvements in participants’ self-assessed confidence, knowledge, and skills. Our findings identify workshop characteristics that are acceptable to multidisciplinary trainees. Further testing is warranted to determine effectiveness and accurately identify workshop components leading to change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58674252018-03-27 ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training Brighton, Lisa Jane Selman, Lucy Ellen Gough, Nicholas Nadicksbernd, JJ Bristowe, Katherine Millington-Sanders, Catherine Koffman, Jonathan BMJ Support Palliat Care Short Report OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based communication skills training for health and social care professionals is essential to improve the care of seriously ill patients and their families. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported impact of ‘Difficult Conversations’, a multidisciplinary half-day interactive workshop, and gain feedback to inform future development and evaluation. METHODS: Service evaluation using questionnaire data collected before and immediately after workshops from February 2015 to August 2016 regarding participant self-assessed confidence, knowledge and skills. Qualitative free-text comments provided feedback about the workshop and were subjected to content analysis. RESULTS: Of 886 workshop participants, 655 completed baseline questionnaires and 714 postworkshop questionnaires; 550 were matched pairs. Participants were qualified or trainee general practitioners (34%), community nurses and care coordinators (32%), social care professionals (7%), care home staff (6%), advanced practice/specialist nurses (5%), care workers (5%) and allied health professionals (3%). All groups demonstrated significant increases in mean self-assessed confidence (2.46, 95% CI 2.41 to 2.51; to 3.20, 95% CI 3.17 to 3.24; P<0.001), knowledge (2.22, 95% CI 2.17 to 2.27; to 3.18, 95% CI 3.14 to 3.22; P<0.001) and skills (2.37, 95% CI 2.32 to 2.42; to 3.09, 95% CI 3.05 to 3.12; P<0.001). Qualitative findings showed participants valued role play, the communication framework acronym and opportunities for discussion. They commended workshop facilitators’ skills, the safe atmosphere and interprofessional learning. Suggested improvements included more prepared role play and greater coverage of the taught topics. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Difficult Conversations’ workshops were associated with improvements in participants’ self-assessed confidence, knowledge, and skills. Our findings identify workshop characteristics that are acceptable to multidisciplinary trainees. Further testing is warranted to determine effectiveness and accurately identify workshop components leading to change. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5867425/ /pubmed/29118100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Short Report
Brighton, Lisa Jane
Selman, Lucy Ellen
Gough, Nicholas
Nadicksbernd, JJ
Bristowe, Katherine
Millington-Sanders, Catherine
Koffman, Jonathan
‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title_full ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title_fullStr ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title_full_unstemmed ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title_short ‘Difficult Conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
title_sort ‘difficult conversations’: evaluation of multiprofessional training
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001447
work_keys_str_mv AT brightonlisajane difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT selmanlucyellen difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT goughnicholas difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT nadicksberndjj difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT bristowekatherine difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT millingtonsanderscatherine difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining
AT koffmanjonathan difficultconversationsevaluationofmultiprofessionaltraining