Cargando…
Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices
BACKGROUND: Postmarket surveillance of medical devices is reliant on physician reporting of adverse medical device events (AMDEs). Little is known about factors that influence whether and how physicians report AMDEs, an essential step in developing behaviour change interventions. This study explored...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006481 |
_version_ | 1783308963760046080 |
---|---|
author | Gagliardi, Anna R Ducey, Ariel Lehoux, Pascale Turgeon, Thomas Ross, Sue Trbovich, Patricia Easty, Anthony Bell, Chaim Urbach, David |
author_facet | Gagliardi, Anna R Ducey, Ariel Lehoux, Pascale Turgeon, Thomas Ross, Sue Trbovich, Patricia Easty, Anthony Bell, Chaim Urbach, David |
author_sort | Gagliardi, Anna R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postmarket surveillance of medical devices is reliant on physician reporting of adverse medical device events (AMDEs). Little is known about factors that influence whether and how physicians report AMDEs, an essential step in developing behaviour change interventions. This study explored factors that influence AMDE reporting. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians who differed by specialties that implant cardiovascular and orthopaedic devices prone to AMDEs, geography and years in practice. Participants were asked if and how they reported AMDEs, and the influencing factors. Themes were identified inductively using constant comparative technique, and reviewed and discussed by the research team on four occasions. RESULTS: Twenty-two physicians of varying specialty, region, organisation and career stage perceived AMDE reporting as unnecessary, not possible or futile due to multiple factors. Physicians viewed AMDEs as an expected part of practice that they could manage by switching to different devices or developing work-around strategies for problematic devices. Physician beliefs and behaviour were reinforced by limited healthcare system capacity and industry responsiveness. The healthcare system lacked processes and infrastructure to detect, capture, share and act on information about AMDEs, and constrained device choice through purchasing contracts. The device industry did not respond to reports of AMDEs from physicians or improve their products based on such reports. As a result, participants said they used devices that were less than ideal for a given patient, leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There may be little point in solely educating or incentivising individual physicians to report AMDEs unless environmental conditions are conducive to doing so. Future research should explore policies that govern AMDEs and investigate how to design and implement postmarket surveillance systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5867432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58674322018-03-27 Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices Gagliardi, Anna R Ducey, Ariel Lehoux, Pascale Turgeon, Thomas Ross, Sue Trbovich, Patricia Easty, Anthony Bell, Chaim Urbach, David BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Postmarket surveillance of medical devices is reliant on physician reporting of adverse medical device events (AMDEs). Little is known about factors that influence whether and how physicians report AMDEs, an essential step in developing behaviour change interventions. This study explored factors that influence AMDE reporting. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians who differed by specialties that implant cardiovascular and orthopaedic devices prone to AMDEs, geography and years in practice. Participants were asked if and how they reported AMDEs, and the influencing factors. Themes were identified inductively using constant comparative technique, and reviewed and discussed by the research team on four occasions. RESULTS: Twenty-two physicians of varying specialty, region, organisation and career stage perceived AMDE reporting as unnecessary, not possible or futile due to multiple factors. Physicians viewed AMDEs as an expected part of practice that they could manage by switching to different devices or developing work-around strategies for problematic devices. Physician beliefs and behaviour were reinforced by limited healthcare system capacity and industry responsiveness. The healthcare system lacked processes and infrastructure to detect, capture, share and act on information about AMDEs, and constrained device choice through purchasing contracts. The device industry did not respond to reports of AMDEs from physicians or improve their products based on such reports. As a result, participants said they used devices that were less than ideal for a given patient, leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There may be little point in solely educating or incentivising individual physicians to report AMDEs unless environmental conditions are conducive to doing so. Future research should explore policies that govern AMDEs and investigate how to design and implement postmarket surveillance systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5867432/ /pubmed/28768712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006481 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gagliardi, Anna R Ducey, Ariel Lehoux, Pascale Turgeon, Thomas Ross, Sue Trbovich, Patricia Easty, Anthony Bell, Chaim Urbach, David Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title | Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title_full | Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title_short | Factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
title_sort | factors influencing the reporting of adverse medical device events: qualitative interviews with physicians about higher risk implantable devices |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagliardiannar factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT duceyariel factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT lehouxpascale factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT turgeonthomas factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT rosssue factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT trbovichpatricia factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT eastyanthony factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT bellchaim factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices AT urbachdavid factorsinfluencingthereportingofadversemedicaldeviceeventsqualitativeinterviewswithphysiciansabouthigherriskimplantabledevices |