Cargando…

Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results

Information about the performance of diagnostic tests is typically presented in the form of measures of test accuracy such as sensitivity and specificity. These measures may be difficult to translate directly into decisions about patient treatment, for which information presented in the form of prob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanshawe, Thomas R, Power, Michael, Graziadio, Sara, Ordóñez-Mena, José M, Simpson, John, Allen, Joy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110862
_version_ 1783308967496122368
author Fanshawe, Thomas R
Power, Michael
Graziadio, Sara
Ordóñez-Mena, José M
Simpson, John
Allen, Joy
author_facet Fanshawe, Thomas R
Power, Michael
Graziadio, Sara
Ordóñez-Mena, José M
Simpson, John
Allen, Joy
author_sort Fanshawe, Thomas R
collection PubMed
description Information about the performance of diagnostic tests is typically presented in the form of measures of test accuracy such as sensitivity and specificity. These measures may be difficult to translate directly into decisions about patient treatment, for which information presented in the form of probabilities of disease after a positive or a negative test result may be more useful. These probabilities depend on the prevalence of the disease, which is likely to vary between populations. This article aims to clarify the relationship between pre-test (prevalence) and post-test probabilities of disease, and presents two free, online interactive tools to illustrate this relationship. These tools allow probabilities of disease to be compared with decision thresholds above and below which different treatment decisions may be indicated. They are intended to help those involved in communicating information about diagnostic test performance and are likely to be of benefit when teaching these concepts. A substantive example is presented using C reactive protein as a diagnostic marker for bacterial infection in the older adult population. The tools may also be useful for manufacturers of clinical tests in planning product development, for authors of test evaluation studies to improve reporting and for users of test evaluations to facilitate interpretation and application of the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58674482018-03-27 Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results Fanshawe, Thomas R Power, Michael Graziadio, Sara Ordóñez-Mena, José M Simpson, John Allen, Joy BMJ Evid Based Med EBM Learning Information about the performance of diagnostic tests is typically presented in the form of measures of test accuracy such as sensitivity and specificity. These measures may be difficult to translate directly into decisions about patient treatment, for which information presented in the form of probabilities of disease after a positive or a negative test result may be more useful. These probabilities depend on the prevalence of the disease, which is likely to vary between populations. This article aims to clarify the relationship between pre-test (prevalence) and post-test probabilities of disease, and presents two free, online interactive tools to illustrate this relationship. These tools allow probabilities of disease to be compared with decision thresholds above and below which different treatment decisions may be indicated. They are intended to help those involved in communicating information about diagnostic test performance and are likely to be of benefit when teaching these concepts. A substantive example is presented using C reactive protein as a diagnostic marker for bacterial infection in the older adult population. The tools may also be useful for manufacturers of clinical tests in planning product development, for authors of test evaluation studies to improve reporting and for users of test evaluations to facilitate interpretation and application of the results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5867448/ /pubmed/29367318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110862 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle EBM Learning
Fanshawe, Thomas R
Power, Michael
Graziadio, Sara
Ordóñez-Mena, José M
Simpson, John
Allen, Joy
Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title_full Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title_fullStr Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title_full_unstemmed Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title_short Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
title_sort interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results
topic EBM Learning
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110862
work_keys_str_mv AT fanshawethomasr interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults
AT powermichael interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults
AT graziadiosara interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults
AT ordonezmenajosem interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults
AT simpsonjohn interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults
AT allenjoy interactivevisualisationforinterpretingdiagnostictestaccuracystudyresults