Cargando…

A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II

Background: Persistent use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves diabetes control in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: PRECISE II was a nonrandomized, blinded, prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that evaluated the accuracy and safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christiansen, Mark P., Klaff, Leslie J., Brazg, Ronald, Chang, Anna R., Levy, Carol J., Lam, David, Denham, Douglas S., Atiee, George, Bode, Bruce W., Walters, Steven J., Kelley, Lynne, Bailey, Timothy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0142
_version_ 1783308977369513984
author Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Brazg, Ronald
Chang, Anna R.
Levy, Carol J.
Lam, David
Denham, Douglas S.
Atiee, George
Bode, Bruce W.
Walters, Steven J.
Kelley, Lynne
Bailey, Timothy S.
author_facet Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Brazg, Ronald
Chang, Anna R.
Levy, Carol J.
Lam, David
Denham, Douglas S.
Atiee, George
Bode, Bruce W.
Walters, Steven J.
Kelley, Lynne
Bailey, Timothy S.
author_sort Christiansen, Mark P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Persistent use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves diabetes control in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: PRECISE II was a nonrandomized, blinded, prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that evaluated the accuracy and safety of the implantable Eversense CGM system among adult participants with T1D and T2D (NCT02647905). The primary endpoint was the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between paired Eversense and Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference measurements through 90 days postinsertion for reference glucose values from 40 to 400 mg/dL. Additional endpoints included Clarke Error Grid analysis and sensor longevity. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of device-related or sensor insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) through 90 days postinsertion. Results: Ninety participants received the CGM system. The overall MARD value against reference glucose values was 8.8% (95% confidence interval: 8.1%–9.3%), which was significantly lower than the prespecified 20% performance goal for accuracy (P < 0.0001). Ninety-three percent of CGM values were within 20/20% of reference values over the total glucose range of 40–400 mg/dL. Clarke Error Grid analysis showed 99.3% of samples in the clinically acceptable error zones A (92.8%) and B (6.5%). Ninety-one percent of sensors were functional through day 90. One related SAE (1.1%) occurred during the study for removal of a sensor. Conclusions: The PRECISE II trial demonstrated that the Eversense CGM system provided accurate glucose readings through the intended 90-day sensor life with a favorable safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58675082018-03-27 A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II Christiansen, Mark P. Klaff, Leslie J. Brazg, Ronald Chang, Anna R. Levy, Carol J. Lam, David Denham, Douglas S. Atiee, George Bode, Bruce W. Walters, Steven J. Kelley, Lynne Bailey, Timothy S. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: Persistent use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves diabetes control in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: PRECISE II was a nonrandomized, blinded, prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that evaluated the accuracy and safety of the implantable Eversense CGM system among adult participants with T1D and T2D (NCT02647905). The primary endpoint was the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between paired Eversense and Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference measurements through 90 days postinsertion for reference glucose values from 40 to 400 mg/dL. Additional endpoints included Clarke Error Grid analysis and sensor longevity. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of device-related or sensor insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) through 90 days postinsertion. Results: Ninety participants received the CGM system. The overall MARD value against reference glucose values was 8.8% (95% confidence interval: 8.1%–9.3%), which was significantly lower than the prespecified 20% performance goal for accuracy (P < 0.0001). Ninety-three percent of CGM values were within 20/20% of reference values over the total glucose range of 40–400 mg/dL. Clarke Error Grid analysis showed 99.3% of samples in the clinically acceptable error zones A (92.8%) and B (6.5%). Ninety-one percent of sensors were functional through day 90. One related SAE (1.1%) occurred during the study for removal of a sensor. Conclusions: The PRECISE II trial demonstrated that the Eversense CGM system provided accurate glucose readings through the intended 90-day sensor life with a favorable safety profile. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018-03-01 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5867508/ /pubmed/29381090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0142 Text en © Mark P. Christiansen, et al. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Christiansen, Mark P.
Klaff, Leslie J.
Brazg, Ronald
Chang, Anna R.
Levy, Carol J.
Lam, David
Denham, Douglas S.
Atiee, George
Bode, Bruce W.
Walters, Steven J.
Kelley, Lynne
Bailey, Timothy S.
A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title_full A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title_fullStr A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title_short A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II
title_sort prospective multicenter evaluation of the accuracy of a novel implanted continuous glucose sensor: precise ii
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0142
work_keys_str_mv AT christiansenmarkp aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT klafflesliej aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT brazgronald aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT changannar aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT levycarolj aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT lamdavid aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT denhamdouglass aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT atieegeorge aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT bodebrucew aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT waltersstevenj aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT kelleylynne aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT baileytimothys aprospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT christiansenmarkp prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT klafflesliej prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT brazgronald prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT changannar prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT levycarolj prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT lamdavid prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT denhamdouglass prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT atieegeorge prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT bodebrucew prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT waltersstevenj prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT kelleylynne prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii
AT baileytimothys prospectivemulticenterevaluationoftheaccuracyofanovelimplantedcontinuousglucosesensorpreciseii