Cargando…

Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alterna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurung, Shailesh, White, Dima, Archer, Gregory, Zhao, Dan, Farnell, Yuhua, Byrd, J. Allen, Peebles, E. David, Farnell, Morgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037
_version_ 1783308979978371072
author Gurung, Shailesh
White, Dima
Archer, Gregory
Zhao, Dan
Farnell, Yuhua
Byrd, J. Allen
Peebles, E. David
Farnell, Morgan
author_facet Gurung, Shailesh
White, Dima
Archer, Gregory
Zhao, Dan
Farnell, Yuhua
Byrd, J. Allen
Peebles, E. David
Farnell, Morgan
author_sort Gurung, Shailesh
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alternatives to maceration. The treatments included carbon dioxide, nitrogen, reduced air pressure, and a negative control. The study showed that chicks exposed to treatments, gases or negative air pressure, did not differ significantly in terms of the physiological stress response. The use of carbon dioxide resulted in a faster onset of unconsciousness and ultimately death as compared to nitrogen or negative air pressure treatments. ABSTRACT: Hatched male layer chicks are currently euthanized by maceration in the United States. Public concerns on the use of maceration have led to the search for alternative methods. We hypothesized that gas inhalation and low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) are viable and humane alternatives to instantaneous mechanical destruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physiological and behavioral responses of recently hatched male layer chicks when subjected to carbon dioxide, nitrogen inhalation, or LAPS. The study consisted of seven treatments: breathing air (NEG), 25% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% CO(2), 75% CO(2), 90% CO(2), 100% nitrogen (N(2)), or LAPS. Ten day-of-hatch, male layer chicks were randomly assigned to each treatment, and each treatment was replicated on ten different days. A custom-made vacuum system was used to reduce air pressure inside the chamber from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa for the LAPS treatment. Serum corticosterone and serotonin levels were measured using commercially available competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness were determined from video recordings. The 25% and 50% CO(2) treatments were discontinued after the first replication, as the majority of the chicks recovered. The chicks in the negative (NEG) group had significantly higher levels of corticosterone than the other four euthanasia treatments. On the other hand, the serotonin levels of chicks in the NEG group was significantly lower when compared to the other four euthanasia treatments. The latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of chicks exposed to 75% and 90% CO(2) were significantly shorter than those in the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. These data suggest that the stress responses of chicks to the CO(2), N(2), and LAPS treatments do not differ among each other. However, the CO(2) inhalation method was faster in inducing loss of posture and motionlessness in chicks than the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58675252018-03-27 Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens Gurung, Shailesh White, Dima Archer, Gregory Zhao, Dan Farnell, Yuhua Byrd, J. Allen Peebles, E. David Farnell, Morgan Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alternatives to maceration. The treatments included carbon dioxide, nitrogen, reduced air pressure, and a negative control. The study showed that chicks exposed to treatments, gases or negative air pressure, did not differ significantly in terms of the physiological stress response. The use of carbon dioxide resulted in a faster onset of unconsciousness and ultimately death as compared to nitrogen or negative air pressure treatments. ABSTRACT: Hatched male layer chicks are currently euthanized by maceration in the United States. Public concerns on the use of maceration have led to the search for alternative methods. We hypothesized that gas inhalation and low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) are viable and humane alternatives to instantaneous mechanical destruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physiological and behavioral responses of recently hatched male layer chicks when subjected to carbon dioxide, nitrogen inhalation, or LAPS. The study consisted of seven treatments: breathing air (NEG), 25% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% CO(2), 75% CO(2), 90% CO(2), 100% nitrogen (N(2)), or LAPS. Ten day-of-hatch, male layer chicks were randomly assigned to each treatment, and each treatment was replicated on ten different days. A custom-made vacuum system was used to reduce air pressure inside the chamber from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa for the LAPS treatment. Serum corticosterone and serotonin levels were measured using commercially available competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness were determined from video recordings. The 25% and 50% CO(2) treatments were discontinued after the first replication, as the majority of the chicks recovered. The chicks in the negative (NEG) group had significantly higher levels of corticosterone than the other four euthanasia treatments. On the other hand, the serotonin levels of chicks in the NEG group was significantly lower when compared to the other four euthanasia treatments. The latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of chicks exposed to 75% and 90% CO(2) were significantly shorter than those in the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. These data suggest that the stress responses of chicks to the CO(2), N(2), and LAPS treatments do not differ among each other. However, the CO(2) inhalation method was faster in inducing loss of posture and motionlessness in chicks than the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. MDPI 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5867525/ /pubmed/29522442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gurung, Shailesh
White, Dima
Archer, Gregory
Zhao, Dan
Farnell, Yuhua
Byrd, J. Allen
Peebles, E. David
Farnell, Morgan
Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title_full Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title_fullStr Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title_short Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
title_sort evaluation of alternative euthanasia methods of neonatal chickens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037
work_keys_str_mv AT gurungshailesh evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT whitedima evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT archergregory evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT zhaodan evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT farnellyuhua evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT byrdjallen evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT peeblesedavid evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens
AT farnellmorgan evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens