Cargando…
Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alterna...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037 |
_version_ | 1783308979978371072 |
---|---|
author | Gurung, Shailesh White, Dima Archer, Gregory Zhao, Dan Farnell, Yuhua Byrd, J. Allen Peebles, E. David Farnell, Morgan |
author_facet | Gurung, Shailesh White, Dima Archer, Gregory Zhao, Dan Farnell, Yuhua Byrd, J. Allen Peebles, E. David Farnell, Morgan |
author_sort | Gurung, Shailesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alternatives to maceration. The treatments included carbon dioxide, nitrogen, reduced air pressure, and a negative control. The study showed that chicks exposed to treatments, gases or negative air pressure, did not differ significantly in terms of the physiological stress response. The use of carbon dioxide resulted in a faster onset of unconsciousness and ultimately death as compared to nitrogen or negative air pressure treatments. ABSTRACT: Hatched male layer chicks are currently euthanized by maceration in the United States. Public concerns on the use of maceration have led to the search for alternative methods. We hypothesized that gas inhalation and low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) are viable and humane alternatives to instantaneous mechanical destruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physiological and behavioral responses of recently hatched male layer chicks when subjected to carbon dioxide, nitrogen inhalation, or LAPS. The study consisted of seven treatments: breathing air (NEG), 25% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% CO(2), 75% CO(2), 90% CO(2), 100% nitrogen (N(2)), or LAPS. Ten day-of-hatch, male layer chicks were randomly assigned to each treatment, and each treatment was replicated on ten different days. A custom-made vacuum system was used to reduce air pressure inside the chamber from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa for the LAPS treatment. Serum corticosterone and serotonin levels were measured using commercially available competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness were determined from video recordings. The 25% and 50% CO(2) treatments were discontinued after the first replication, as the majority of the chicks recovered. The chicks in the negative (NEG) group had significantly higher levels of corticosterone than the other four euthanasia treatments. On the other hand, the serotonin levels of chicks in the NEG group was significantly lower when compared to the other four euthanasia treatments. The latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of chicks exposed to 75% and 90% CO(2) were significantly shorter than those in the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. These data suggest that the stress responses of chicks to the CO(2), N(2), and LAPS treatments do not differ among each other. However, the CO(2) inhalation method was faster in inducing loss of posture and motionlessness in chicks than the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5867525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58675252018-03-27 Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens Gurung, Shailesh White, Dima Archer, Gregory Zhao, Dan Farnell, Yuhua Byrd, J. Allen Peebles, E. David Farnell, Morgan Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Male layer chicks do not have economic value and are humanely killed after hatching. The layer industry is seeking alternative methods to humanely kill recently hatched male chicks. This study evaluated the use of gases or negative air pressure as a means of humane and viable alternatives to maceration. The treatments included carbon dioxide, nitrogen, reduced air pressure, and a negative control. The study showed that chicks exposed to treatments, gases or negative air pressure, did not differ significantly in terms of the physiological stress response. The use of carbon dioxide resulted in a faster onset of unconsciousness and ultimately death as compared to nitrogen or negative air pressure treatments. ABSTRACT: Hatched male layer chicks are currently euthanized by maceration in the United States. Public concerns on the use of maceration have led to the search for alternative methods. We hypothesized that gas inhalation and low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) are viable and humane alternatives to instantaneous mechanical destruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physiological and behavioral responses of recently hatched male layer chicks when subjected to carbon dioxide, nitrogen inhalation, or LAPS. The study consisted of seven treatments: breathing air (NEG), 25% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% CO(2), 75% CO(2), 90% CO(2), 100% nitrogen (N(2)), or LAPS. Ten day-of-hatch, male layer chicks were randomly assigned to each treatment, and each treatment was replicated on ten different days. A custom-made vacuum system was used to reduce air pressure inside the chamber from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa for the LAPS treatment. Serum corticosterone and serotonin levels were measured using commercially available competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness were determined from video recordings. The 25% and 50% CO(2) treatments were discontinued after the first replication, as the majority of the chicks recovered. The chicks in the negative (NEG) group had significantly higher levels of corticosterone than the other four euthanasia treatments. On the other hand, the serotonin levels of chicks in the NEG group was significantly lower when compared to the other four euthanasia treatments. The latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of chicks exposed to 75% and 90% CO(2) were significantly shorter than those in the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. These data suggest that the stress responses of chicks to the CO(2), N(2), and LAPS treatments do not differ among each other. However, the CO(2) inhalation method was faster in inducing loss of posture and motionlessness in chicks than the LAPS and N(2) inhalation treatments. MDPI 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5867525/ /pubmed/29522442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gurung, Shailesh White, Dima Archer, Gregory Zhao, Dan Farnell, Yuhua Byrd, J. Allen Peebles, E. David Farnell, Morgan Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title | Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title_full | Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title_short | Evaluation of Alternative Euthanasia Methods of Neonatal Chickens |
title_sort | evaluation of alternative euthanasia methods of neonatal chickens |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurungshailesh evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT whitedima evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT archergregory evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT zhaodan evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT farnellyuhua evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT byrdjallen evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT peeblesedavid evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens AT farnellmorgan evaluationofalternativeeuthanasiamethodsofneonatalchickens |