Cargando…

Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal care guidelines for livestock and poultry require farms to have euthanasia plans in place for birds that are sick, injured, or unable to access feed and water. Killing methods considered to be humane are those that induce rapid insensibility (stun) and result in brain death le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woolcott, Caitlin R., Torrey, Stephanie, Turner, Patricia V., Serpa, Lilia, Schwean-Lardner, Karen, Widowski, Tina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030042
_version_ 1783308981212545024
author Woolcott, Caitlin R.
Torrey, Stephanie
Turner, Patricia V.
Serpa, Lilia
Schwean-Lardner, Karen
Widowski, Tina M.
author_facet Woolcott, Caitlin R.
Torrey, Stephanie
Turner, Patricia V.
Serpa, Lilia
Schwean-Lardner, Karen
Widowski, Tina M.
author_sort Woolcott, Caitlin R.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal care guidelines for livestock and poultry require farms to have euthanasia plans in place for birds that are sick, injured, or unable to access feed and water. Killing methods considered to be humane are those that induce rapid insensibility (stun) and result in brain death leading to irreversible respiratory and cardiac arrest. Therefore, the evaluation of the effectiveness of a killing method generally focuses on measures of insensibility and brain death. Non-penetrating captive bolt devices are intended to deliver sufficient force and energy to the head to result in immediate insensibility and brain death without penetrating the skin. We evaluated the effectiveness of two models of non-penetrating captive bolt devices when applied by stock people to different sizes and ages of turkeys, using signs of insensibility corroborated by ante- and post- mortem evaluation of brain damage. Both non-penetrating captive bolt devices used in this study were found to be highly effective at inducing immediate insensibility and would be appropriate for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys of various ages and size. ABSTRACT: On-farm euthanasia is a critical welfare issue in the poultry industry and can be particularly difficult to perform on mature turkeys due to their size. We evaluated the efficacy of two commercially available non-penetrating captive bolt devices, the Zephyr-EXL and the Turkey Euthanasia Device (TED), on 253 turkeys at three stages of production: 4–5, 10, and 15–20 weeks of age. Effectiveness of each device was measured using both ante- and post-mortem measures. Application of the Zephyr-EXL resulted in a greater success rate (immediate abolishment of brainstem reflexes) compared to the TED (97.6% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.0145). Times to last movement (p = 0.102) and cardiac arrest (p = 0.164) did not differ between devices. Ante- and post-mortem measures of trauma and hemorrhage were highly correlated. Skull fractures and gross subdural hemorrhage (SDH) were present in 100% of birds euthanized with both the Zephyr-EXL and TED devices. Gross SDH scores were greater in birds killed with the Zephyr-EXL than the TED (p < 0.001). Microscopic SDH scores indicated moderate to severe hemorrhage in 92% of turkeys for the Zephyr-EXL and 96% of turkeys for the TED, with no difference between devices (p = 0.844). Overall, both devices were highly effective inducing immediate insensibility through traumatic brain injury and are reliable, single-step methods for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58675302018-03-27 Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys Woolcott, Caitlin R. Torrey, Stephanie Turner, Patricia V. Serpa, Lilia Schwean-Lardner, Karen Widowski, Tina M. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal care guidelines for livestock and poultry require farms to have euthanasia plans in place for birds that are sick, injured, or unable to access feed and water. Killing methods considered to be humane are those that induce rapid insensibility (stun) and result in brain death leading to irreversible respiratory and cardiac arrest. Therefore, the evaluation of the effectiveness of a killing method generally focuses on measures of insensibility and brain death. Non-penetrating captive bolt devices are intended to deliver sufficient force and energy to the head to result in immediate insensibility and brain death without penetrating the skin. We evaluated the effectiveness of two models of non-penetrating captive bolt devices when applied by stock people to different sizes and ages of turkeys, using signs of insensibility corroborated by ante- and post- mortem evaluation of brain damage. Both non-penetrating captive bolt devices used in this study were found to be highly effective at inducing immediate insensibility and would be appropriate for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys of various ages and size. ABSTRACT: On-farm euthanasia is a critical welfare issue in the poultry industry and can be particularly difficult to perform on mature turkeys due to their size. We evaluated the efficacy of two commercially available non-penetrating captive bolt devices, the Zephyr-EXL and the Turkey Euthanasia Device (TED), on 253 turkeys at three stages of production: 4–5, 10, and 15–20 weeks of age. Effectiveness of each device was measured using both ante- and post-mortem measures. Application of the Zephyr-EXL resulted in a greater success rate (immediate abolishment of brainstem reflexes) compared to the TED (97.6% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.0145). Times to last movement (p = 0.102) and cardiac arrest (p = 0.164) did not differ between devices. Ante- and post-mortem measures of trauma and hemorrhage were highly correlated. Skull fractures and gross subdural hemorrhage (SDH) were present in 100% of birds euthanized with both the Zephyr-EXL and TED devices. Gross SDH scores were greater in birds killed with the Zephyr-EXL than the TED (p < 0.001). Microscopic SDH scores indicated moderate to severe hemorrhage in 92% of turkeys for the Zephyr-EXL and 96% of turkeys for the TED, with no difference between devices (p = 0.844). Overall, both devices were highly effective inducing immediate insensibility through traumatic brain injury and are reliable, single-step methods for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys. MDPI 2018-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5867530/ /pubmed/29558419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030042 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Woolcott, Caitlin R.
Torrey, Stephanie
Turner, Patricia V.
Serpa, Lilia
Schwean-Lardner, Karen
Widowski, Tina M.
Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title_full Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title_fullStr Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title_short Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys
title_sort evaluation of two models of non-penetrating captive bolt devices for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8030042
work_keys_str_mv AT woolcottcaitlinr evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys
AT torreystephanie evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys
AT turnerpatriciav evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys
AT serpalilia evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys
AT schweanlardnerkaren evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys
AT widowskitinam evaluationoftwomodelsofnonpenetratingcaptiveboltdevicesforonfarmeuthanasiaofturkeys