Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials

AIMS: Insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine (IGlar) are both proved to be effective in diabetes. This study aimed to assess the effects and safety of IDeg versus IGlar. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Wei, Yang, Xiaojie, Huang, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8726046
_version_ 1783308993425309696
author Liu, Wei
Yang, Xiaojie
Huang, Jing
author_facet Liu, Wei
Yang, Xiaojie
Huang, Jing
author_sort Liu, Wei
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine (IGlar) are both proved to be effective in diabetes. This study aimed to assess the effects and safety of IDeg versus IGlar. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified. The combined data showed that the decrease in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level was slightly different, and the proportion of patients who achieved HbA1c < 7% was similar between the IDeg and IGlar groups. Further, a statistically significant decrease in the fasting plasma glucose level was observed in the IDeg group as compared to the IGlar group. In patients with T2DM, IDeg was associated with lower rates of overall hypoglycemia. Nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the case of IDeg than in the case of IGlar in both T1DM and T2DM patients. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IGlar, IDeg is associated with equivalent glycemic control and a statistically significantly lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM and T2DM. In T2DM patients, IDeg also provides better results in terms of overall hypoglycemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5867587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58675872018-05-02 Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials Liu, Wei Yang, Xiaojie Huang, Jing Int J Endocrinol Review Article AIMS: Insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine (IGlar) are both proved to be effective in diabetes. This study aimed to assess the effects and safety of IDeg versus IGlar. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified. The combined data showed that the decrease in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level was slightly different, and the proportion of patients who achieved HbA1c < 7% was similar between the IDeg and IGlar groups. Further, a statistically significant decrease in the fasting plasma glucose level was observed in the IDeg group as compared to the IGlar group. In patients with T2DM, IDeg was associated with lower rates of overall hypoglycemia. Nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the case of IDeg than in the case of IGlar in both T1DM and T2DM patients. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IGlar, IDeg is associated with equivalent glycemic control and a statistically significantly lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM and T2DM. In T2DM patients, IDeg also provides better results in terms of overall hypoglycemia. Hindawi 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5867587/ /pubmed/29721018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8726046 Text en Copyright © 2018 Wei Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Wei
Yang, Xiaojie
Huang, Jing
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifteen clinical trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8726046
work_keys_str_mv AT liuwei efficacyandsafetyofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffifteenclinicaltrials
AT yangxiaojie efficacyandsafetyofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffifteenclinicaltrials
AT huangjing efficacyandsafetyofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffifteenclinicaltrials