Cargando…

Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

INTRODUCTION: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is diagnosed by a standardized oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, the OGTT is laborious, and when not performed, glucose tolerance cannot be determined from fasting samples retrospectively. We tested if glucose tolerance status is reasonably p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babbar, Rohit, Heni, Martin, Peter, Andreas, Hrabě de Angelis, Martin, Häring, Hans-Ulrich, Fritsche, Andreas, Preissl, Hubert, Schölkopf, Bernhard, Wagner, Róbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00082
_version_ 1783309094923272192
author Babbar, Rohit
Heni, Martin
Peter, Andreas
Hrabě de Angelis, Martin
Häring, Hans-Ulrich
Fritsche, Andreas
Preissl, Hubert
Schölkopf, Bernhard
Wagner, Róbert
author_facet Babbar, Rohit
Heni, Martin
Peter, Andreas
Hrabě de Angelis, Martin
Häring, Hans-Ulrich
Fritsche, Andreas
Preissl, Hubert
Schölkopf, Bernhard
Wagner, Róbert
author_sort Babbar, Rohit
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is diagnosed by a standardized oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, the OGTT is laborious, and when not performed, glucose tolerance cannot be determined from fasting samples retrospectively. We tested if glucose tolerance status is reasonably predictable from a combination of demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data assessed at one time point in a fasting state. METHODS: Given a set of 22 variables selected upon clinical feasibility such as sex, age, height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting glucose, HbA1c, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum potassium, fasting levels of insulin, C-peptide, triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), proinsulin, prolactin, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, HDL, uric acid, liver transaminases, and ferritin, we used supervised machine learning to estimate glucose tolerance status in 2,337 participants of the TUEF study who were recruited before 2012. We tested the performance of 10 different machine learning classifiers on data from 929 participants in the test set who were recruited after 2012. In addition, reproducibility of IGT was analyzed in 78 participants who had 2 repeated OGTTs within 1 year. RESULTS: The most accurate prediction of IGT was reached with the recursive partitioning method (accuracy = 0.78). For all classifiers, mean accuracy was 0.73 ± 0.04. The most important model variable was fasting glucose in all models. Using mean variable importance across all models, fasting glucose was followed by NEFA, triglycerides, HbA1c, and C-peptide. The accuracy of predicting IGT from a previous OGTT was 0.77. CONCLUSION: Machine learning methods yield moderate accuracy in predicting glucose tolerance from a wide set of clinical and laboratory variables. A substitution of OGTT does not currently seem to be feasible. An important constraint could be the limited reproducibility of glucose tolerance status during a subsequent OGTT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5868129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58681292018-04-03 Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Babbar, Rohit Heni, Martin Peter, Andreas Hrabě de Angelis, Martin Häring, Hans-Ulrich Fritsche, Andreas Preissl, Hubert Schölkopf, Bernhard Wagner, Róbert Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is diagnosed by a standardized oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, the OGTT is laborious, and when not performed, glucose tolerance cannot be determined from fasting samples retrospectively. We tested if glucose tolerance status is reasonably predictable from a combination of demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data assessed at one time point in a fasting state. METHODS: Given a set of 22 variables selected upon clinical feasibility such as sex, age, height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting glucose, HbA1c, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum potassium, fasting levels of insulin, C-peptide, triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), proinsulin, prolactin, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, HDL, uric acid, liver transaminases, and ferritin, we used supervised machine learning to estimate glucose tolerance status in 2,337 participants of the TUEF study who were recruited before 2012. We tested the performance of 10 different machine learning classifiers on data from 929 participants in the test set who were recruited after 2012. In addition, reproducibility of IGT was analyzed in 78 participants who had 2 repeated OGTTs within 1 year. RESULTS: The most accurate prediction of IGT was reached with the recursive partitioning method (accuracy = 0.78). For all classifiers, mean accuracy was 0.73 ± 0.04. The most important model variable was fasting glucose in all models. Using mean variable importance across all models, fasting glucose was followed by NEFA, triglycerides, HbA1c, and C-peptide. The accuracy of predicting IGT from a previous OGTT was 0.77. CONCLUSION: Machine learning methods yield moderate accuracy in predicting glucose tolerance from a wide set of clinical and laboratory variables. A substitution of OGTT does not currently seem to be feasible. An important constraint could be the limited reproducibility of glucose tolerance status during a subsequent OGTT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5868129/ /pubmed/29615972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00082 Text en Copyright © 2018 Babbar, Heni, Peter, Hrabě de Angelis, Häring, Fritsche, Preissl, Schölkopf and Wagner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Babbar, Rohit
Heni, Martin
Peter, Andreas
Hrabě de Angelis, Martin
Häring, Hans-Ulrich
Fritsche, Andreas
Preissl, Hubert
Schölkopf, Bernhard
Wagner, Róbert
Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title_full Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title_fullStr Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title_short Prediction of Glucose Tolerance without an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
title_sort prediction of glucose tolerance without an oral glucose tolerance test
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00082
work_keys_str_mv AT babbarrohit predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT henimartin predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT peterandreas predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT hrabedeangelismartin predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT haringhansulrich predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT fritscheandreas predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT preisslhubert predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT scholkopfbernhard predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest
AT wagnerrobert predictionofglucosetolerancewithoutanoralglucosetolerancetest