Cargando…

One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)

BACKGROUND: Rectovestibular fistula (RVF) is the most common type of anorectal malformations in females. The need for a diverting colostomy during correction of defect has ignited a heated debate. In this study, we reviewed the girls with RVF that had been treated by either one or two stage procedur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalifa, Mohammed, Shreef, Khalid, Al Ekrashy, Mohammad Ahmad, Gobran, Tarek Abdelazim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_61_16
_version_ 1783309118348460032
author Khalifa, Mohammed
Shreef, Khalid
Al Ekrashy, Mohammad Ahmad
Gobran, Tarek Abdelazim
author_facet Khalifa, Mohammed
Shreef, Khalid
Al Ekrashy, Mohammad Ahmad
Gobran, Tarek Abdelazim
author_sort Khalifa, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectovestibular fistula (RVF) is the most common type of anorectal malformations in females. The need for a diverting colostomy during correction of defect has ignited a heated debate. In this study, we reviewed the girls with RVF that had been treated by either one or two stage procedure in the past 10 years in our institution to define whether one stage or two stage procedures is safer and more beneficial for the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy girls with RVF that had been operated from January 2005 to January 2015 were studied retrospectively. Data were obtained from medical hospital records. The cases were divided into two groups. Group A (46 patients): were operated by two stages technique (simultaneous sigmoid colostomy and anterior sagittal anorectoplasty [ASARP]). Group B (24 patients): were operated by one stage (ASARP without covering colostomy). The short-term outcome as regard wound infection, wound dehiscence, anal stenosis, anal retraction, recurrence of fistula as well as complications of colostomy was reported. The long-term outcome as regard soiling, constipation and voluntary bowel movement was evaluated. RESULTS: The age of patients at the time of surgery ranged from 3 months to 2 years (mean; 9.5 months). In Group A, seven patients (15.2%) developed wound infection, two patients developed wound disruption. One patient developed anterior anal retraction and required redo-operation, anal stenosis was noticed in five (10.9%) patients. Complications from colostomy had occurred in nine patients (19.5%). In Group B, wound infection occurred in ten patients (41.7%). Seven patients (29.2%) developed wound disruption. Anal stenosis occurred in eight patients (33.3%). Five patients required redo-operation because of anal retraction in three patients and recurrence of fistula in the other two patients. Constipation recorded in 15 patients (32.6%) of Group A and in ten patients (41.3%) of Group B. Soiling was reported in six girls (13.04%) of Group A and five girls (20.8%) of Group B. CONCLUSION: The avoidance of colostomy is not outweighed achieving sound operation and continent child. Two stages correction of RVF is safer and more beneficial than one stage procedure, especially in our locality and for our paediatric surgeons during their learning curve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5868232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58682322018-04-04 One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience) Khalifa, Mohammed Shreef, Khalid Al Ekrashy, Mohammad Ahmad Gobran, Tarek Abdelazim Afr J Paediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Rectovestibular fistula (RVF) is the most common type of anorectal malformations in females. The need for a diverting colostomy during correction of defect has ignited a heated debate. In this study, we reviewed the girls with RVF that had been treated by either one or two stage procedure in the past 10 years in our institution to define whether one stage or two stage procedures is safer and more beneficial for the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy girls with RVF that had been operated from January 2005 to January 2015 were studied retrospectively. Data were obtained from medical hospital records. The cases were divided into two groups. Group A (46 patients): were operated by two stages technique (simultaneous sigmoid colostomy and anterior sagittal anorectoplasty [ASARP]). Group B (24 patients): were operated by one stage (ASARP without covering colostomy). The short-term outcome as regard wound infection, wound dehiscence, anal stenosis, anal retraction, recurrence of fistula as well as complications of colostomy was reported. The long-term outcome as regard soiling, constipation and voluntary bowel movement was evaluated. RESULTS: The age of patients at the time of surgery ranged from 3 months to 2 years (mean; 9.5 months). In Group A, seven patients (15.2%) developed wound infection, two patients developed wound disruption. One patient developed anterior anal retraction and required redo-operation, anal stenosis was noticed in five (10.9%) patients. Complications from colostomy had occurred in nine patients (19.5%). In Group B, wound infection occurred in ten patients (41.7%). Seven patients (29.2%) developed wound disruption. Anal stenosis occurred in eight patients (33.3%). Five patients required redo-operation because of anal retraction in three patients and recurrence of fistula in the other two patients. Constipation recorded in 15 patients (32.6%) of Group A and in ten patients (41.3%) of Group B. Soiling was reported in six girls (13.04%) of Group A and five girls (20.8%) of Group B. CONCLUSION: The avoidance of colostomy is not outweighed achieving sound operation and continent child. Two stages correction of RVF is safer and more beneficial than one stage procedure, especially in our locality and for our paediatric surgeons during their learning curve. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5868232/ /pubmed/29511136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_61_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 African Journal of Paediatric Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khalifa, Mohammed
Shreef, Khalid
Al Ekrashy, Mohammad Ahmad
Gobran, Tarek Abdelazim
One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title_full One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title_fullStr One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title_full_unstemmed One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title_short One or Two Stages Procedure for Repair of Rectovestibular Fistula: Which is Safer? (A Single Institution Experience)
title_sort one or two stages procedure for repair of rectovestibular fistula: which is safer? (a single institution experience)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_61_16
work_keys_str_mv AT khalifamohammed oneortwostagesprocedureforrepairofrectovestibularfistulawhichissaferasingleinstitutionexperience
AT shreefkhalid oneortwostagesprocedureforrepairofrectovestibularfistulawhichissaferasingleinstitutionexperience
AT alekrashymohammadahmad oneortwostagesprocedureforrepairofrectovestibularfistulawhichissaferasingleinstitutionexperience
AT gobrantarekabdelazim oneortwostagesprocedureforrepairofrectovestibularfistulawhichissaferasingleinstitutionexperience