Cargando…

Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility

The microscopic interfacial structures for a series of metal–organic framework/polymer composites consisting of the Zr-based UiO-66 coupled with different polymers are systematically explored by applying a computational methodology that integrates density functional theory calculations and force fie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Semino, R., Moreton, J. C., Ramsahye, N. A., Cohen, S. M., Maurin, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04152g
_version_ 1783309131519623168
author Semino, R.
Moreton, J. C.
Ramsahye, N. A.
Cohen, S. M.
Maurin, G.
author_facet Semino, R.
Moreton, J. C.
Ramsahye, N. A.
Cohen, S. M.
Maurin, G.
author_sort Semino, R.
collection PubMed
description The microscopic interfacial structures for a series of metal–organic framework/polymer composites consisting of the Zr-based UiO-66 coupled with different polymers are systematically explored by applying a computational methodology that integrates density functional theory calculations and force field-based molecular dynamics simulations. These predictions are correlated with experimental findings to unravel the structure–compatibility relationship of the MOF/polymer pairs. The relative contributions of the intermolecular MOF/polymer interactions and the flexibility/rigidity of the polymer with respect to the microscopic structure of the interface are rationalized, and their impact on the compatibility of the two components in the resulting composite is discussed. The most compatible pairs among those investigated involve more flexible polymers, i.e. polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). These polymers exhibit an enhanced contact surface, due to a better adaptation of their configuration to the MOF surface. In these cases, the irregularities at the MOF surface are filled by the polymer, and even some penetration of the terminal groups of the polymer into the pores of the MOF can be observed. As a result, the affinity between the MOF and the polymer is very high; however, the pores of the MOF may be sterically blocked due to the strong MOF/polymer interactions, as evidenced by UiO-66/PEG composites. In contrast, composites involving polymers that exhibit higher rigidity, such as the polymer of intrinsic microporosity-1 (PIM-1) or polystyrene (PS), present interfacial microvoids that contribute to a decrease in the contact surface between the two components, thus reducing the MOF/polymer affinity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5868319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58683192018-04-06 Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility Semino, R. Moreton, J. C. Ramsahye, N. A. Cohen, S. M. Maurin, G. Chem Sci Chemistry The microscopic interfacial structures for a series of metal–organic framework/polymer composites consisting of the Zr-based UiO-66 coupled with different polymers are systematically explored by applying a computational methodology that integrates density functional theory calculations and force field-based molecular dynamics simulations. These predictions are correlated with experimental findings to unravel the structure–compatibility relationship of the MOF/polymer pairs. The relative contributions of the intermolecular MOF/polymer interactions and the flexibility/rigidity of the polymer with respect to the microscopic structure of the interface are rationalized, and their impact on the compatibility of the two components in the resulting composite is discussed. The most compatible pairs among those investigated involve more flexible polymers, i.e. polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). These polymers exhibit an enhanced contact surface, due to a better adaptation of their configuration to the MOF surface. In these cases, the irregularities at the MOF surface are filled by the polymer, and even some penetration of the terminal groups of the polymer into the pores of the MOF can be observed. As a result, the affinity between the MOF and the polymer is very high; however, the pores of the MOF may be sterically blocked due to the strong MOF/polymer interactions, as evidenced by UiO-66/PEG composites. In contrast, composites involving polymers that exhibit higher rigidity, such as the polymer of intrinsic microporosity-1 (PIM-1) or polystyrene (PS), present interfacial microvoids that contribute to a decrease in the contact surface between the two components, thus reducing the MOF/polymer affinity. Royal Society of Chemistry 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5868319/ /pubmed/29629100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04152g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Semino, R.
Moreton, J. C.
Ramsahye, N. A.
Cohen, S. M.
Maurin, G.
Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title_full Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title_fullStr Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title_short Understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
title_sort understanding the origins of metal–organic framework/polymer compatibility
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04152g
work_keys_str_mv AT seminor understandingtheoriginsofmetalorganicframeworkpolymercompatibility
AT moretonjc understandingtheoriginsofmetalorganicframeworkpolymercompatibility
AT ramsahyena understandingtheoriginsofmetalorganicframeworkpolymercompatibility
AT cohensm understandingtheoriginsofmetalorganicframeworkpolymercompatibility
AT mauring understandingtheoriginsofmetalorganicframeworkpolymercompatibility