Cargando…

Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection

Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening disease. Current therapeutic guidelines recommend medical therapy with aggressive blood pressure lowering for patients with acute TBAD unless they have fatal complications. Although patients with uncomplicated TBAD have relatively low ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kaji, Shuichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17017
_version_ 1783309146078052352
author Kaji, Shuichiro
author_facet Kaji, Shuichiro
author_sort Kaji, Shuichiro
collection PubMed
description Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening disease. Current therapeutic guidelines recommend medical therapy with aggressive blood pressure lowering for patients with acute TBAD unless they have fatal complications. Although patients with uncomplicated TBAD have relatively low early mortality, aorta-related adverse events during the chronic phase worsen the long-term clinical outcome. Recent advances in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with both complicated and uncomplicated TBAD. According to present guidelines, complicated TBAD patients are recommended for TEVAR. However, the indication in uncomplicated TBAD remains controversial. Recent results of randomized trials, which compared the clinical outcome in patients treated with optimal medical therapy and those treated with TEVAR, suggest that preemptive TEVAR should be considered in uncomplicated TBAD with suitable aortic anatomy. However, these trials failed to show improvement in early mortality in patients treated with TEVAR compared with patients treated with optimal medical therapy, which suggest the importance of patient selection for TEVAR. Several clinical and imaging-related risk factors have been shown to be associated with early disease progression. Preemptive TEVAR might be beneficial and should be considered for high-risk patients with uncomplicated TBAD. However, an interdisciplinary consensus has not been established for the definition of patients at high-risk of TBAD, and it should be confirmed by experts including physicians, radiologists, interventionalists, and vascular surgeons. This review summarizes the current understanding of the therapeutic strategy in patients with TBAD based on evidence and expert consensus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5868505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japan Atherosclerosis Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58685052018-03-28 Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection Kaji, Shuichiro J Atheroscler Thromb Review Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening disease. Current therapeutic guidelines recommend medical therapy with aggressive blood pressure lowering for patients with acute TBAD unless they have fatal complications. Although patients with uncomplicated TBAD have relatively low early mortality, aorta-related adverse events during the chronic phase worsen the long-term clinical outcome. Recent advances in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with both complicated and uncomplicated TBAD. According to present guidelines, complicated TBAD patients are recommended for TEVAR. However, the indication in uncomplicated TBAD remains controversial. Recent results of randomized trials, which compared the clinical outcome in patients treated with optimal medical therapy and those treated with TEVAR, suggest that preemptive TEVAR should be considered in uncomplicated TBAD with suitable aortic anatomy. However, these trials failed to show improvement in early mortality in patients treated with TEVAR compared with patients treated with optimal medical therapy, which suggest the importance of patient selection for TEVAR. Several clinical and imaging-related risk factors have been shown to be associated with early disease progression. Preemptive TEVAR might be beneficial and should be considered for high-risk patients with uncomplicated TBAD. However, an interdisciplinary consensus has not been established for the definition of patients at high-risk of TBAD, and it should be confirmed by experts including physicians, radiologists, interventionalists, and vascular surgeons. This review summarizes the current understanding of the therapeutic strategy in patients with TBAD based on evidence and expert consensus. Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5868505/ /pubmed/29129854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17017 Text en 2018 Japan Atherosclerosis Society This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Review
Kaji, Shuichiro
Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title_full Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title_fullStr Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title_short Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection
title_sort update on the therapeutic strategy of type b aortic dissection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17017
work_keys_str_mv AT kajishuichiro updateonthetherapeuticstrategyoftypebaorticdissection