Cargando…

Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (28 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma, who had used tafluprost and timolol gel for at least 3 months with good adherence, were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Kenji, Kawashima, Taku, Katakura, Seiki, Shidara, Kyoko, Fujimoto, Takayuki, Kohmoto, Hiromi, Shiokawa, Minako, Moriyama, Ryo, Okayama, Ryoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S150595
_version_ 1783309160303034368
author Inoue, Kenji
Kawashima, Taku
Katakura, Seiki
Shidara, Kyoko
Fujimoto, Takayuki
Kohmoto, Hiromi
Shiokawa, Minako
Moriyama, Ryo
Okayama, Ryoko
author_facet Inoue, Kenji
Kawashima, Taku
Katakura, Seiki
Shidara, Kyoko
Fujimoto, Takayuki
Kohmoto, Hiromi
Shiokawa, Minako
Moriyama, Ryo
Okayama, Ryoko
author_sort Inoue, Kenji
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (28 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma, who had used tafluprost and timolol gel for at least 3 months with good adherence, were enrolled. Concomitant administration of tafluprost and timolol was switched to TTFC without a washout period. The intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, pulse rate, and ocular signs were compared between before switching (baseline), and 4 and 8 weeks after switching. A questionnaire survey was also performed 4 weeks after switching to investigate ocular comfort and patient preferences. RESULTS: The IOP showed no significant change after switching to TTFC (14.8 ± 2.8, 14.6 ± 3.4, and 14.8 ± 3.7 mmHg at baseline, Week 4, and Week 8, respectively). The pulse rate and systolic blood pressure showed no changes, but diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower at Week 8. At baseline, fluorescein staining revealed corneal abnormalities in 3 patients, which resolved by Week 8 in 1 patient. Hyperemia was noted in 2 patients at baseline, and this also resolved by Week 8 in 1 patient. Three patients discontinued study treatment for the following reasons (1 patient each): blurred vision; ocular irritation, eyelid erythema, and asthenopia; and loss to follow-up from Week 8. The questionnaire survey revealed no significant differences between the 2 treatments, although more patients preferred TTFC. CONCLUSION: Among 28 patients enrolled, only 2 patients discontinued the study treatment due to adverse reactions. In patients whose adherence was considered relatively good to concomitant therapy, switching to TTFC achieved similar IOP control with good safety and a high level of patient acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5868587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58685872018-03-30 Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination Inoue, Kenji Kawashima, Taku Katakura, Seiki Shidara, Kyoko Fujimoto, Takayuki Kohmoto, Hiromi Shiokawa, Minako Moriyama, Ryo Okayama, Ryoko Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (28 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma, who had used tafluprost and timolol gel for at least 3 months with good adherence, were enrolled. Concomitant administration of tafluprost and timolol was switched to TTFC without a washout period. The intraocular pressure (IOP), blood pressure, pulse rate, and ocular signs were compared between before switching (baseline), and 4 and 8 weeks after switching. A questionnaire survey was also performed 4 weeks after switching to investigate ocular comfort and patient preferences. RESULTS: The IOP showed no significant change after switching to TTFC (14.8 ± 2.8, 14.6 ± 3.4, and 14.8 ± 3.7 mmHg at baseline, Week 4, and Week 8, respectively). The pulse rate and systolic blood pressure showed no changes, but diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower at Week 8. At baseline, fluorescein staining revealed corneal abnormalities in 3 patients, which resolved by Week 8 in 1 patient. Hyperemia was noted in 2 patients at baseline, and this also resolved by Week 8 in 1 patient. Three patients discontinued study treatment for the following reasons (1 patient each): blurred vision; ocular irritation, eyelid erythema, and asthenopia; and loss to follow-up from Week 8. The questionnaire survey revealed no significant differences between the 2 treatments, although more patients preferred TTFC. CONCLUSION: Among 28 patients enrolled, only 2 patients discontinued the study treatment due to adverse reactions. In patients whose adherence was considered relatively good to concomitant therapy, switching to TTFC achieved similar IOP control with good safety and a high level of patient acceptance. Dove Medical Press 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5868587/ /pubmed/29606852 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S150595 Text en © 2018 Inoue et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Inoue, Kenji
Kawashima, Taku
Katakura, Seiki
Shidara, Kyoko
Fujimoto, Takayuki
Kohmoto, Hiromi
Shiokawa, Minako
Moriyama, Ryo
Okayama, Ryoko
Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title_full Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title_fullStr Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title_full_unstemmed Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title_short Switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
title_sort switching from concomitant therapy to tafluprost/timolol fixed combination
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S150595
work_keys_str_mv AT inouekenji switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT kawashimataku switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT katakuraseiki switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT shidarakyoko switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT fujimototakayuki switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT kohmotohiromi switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT shiokawaminako switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT moriyamaryo switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination
AT okayamaryoko switchingfromconcomitanttherapytotafluprosttimololfixedcombination