Cargando…

Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)

Little is known about the drug survival of second-line biologic therapies for psoriasis in routine clinical practice. We assessed drug survival of second-line biologic therapies and estimated the risk of recurrent discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness in patients with psoriasis wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iskandar, Ireny Y.K., Warren, Richard B., Lunt, Mark, Mason, Kayleigh J., Evans, Ian, McElhone, Kathleen, Smith, Catherine H., Reynolds, Nick J., Ashcroft, Darren M., Griffiths, Christopher E.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29080680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.044
_version_ 1783309228944916480
author Iskandar, Ireny Y.K.
Warren, Richard B.
Lunt, Mark
Mason, Kayleigh J.
Evans, Ian
McElhone, Kathleen
Smith, Catherine H.
Reynolds, Nick J.
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Griffiths, Christopher E.M.
author_facet Iskandar, Ireny Y.K.
Warren, Richard B.
Lunt, Mark
Mason, Kayleigh J.
Evans, Ian
McElhone, Kathleen
Smith, Catherine H.
Reynolds, Nick J.
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Griffiths, Christopher E.M.
author_sort Iskandar, Ireny Y.K.
collection PubMed
description Little is known about the drug survival of second-line biologic therapies for psoriasis in routine clinical practice. We assessed drug survival of second-line biologic therapies and estimated the risk of recurrent discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness in patients with psoriasis who had failed a first biologic therapy and switched to a second in a large, multicenter pharmacovigilance registry (n = 1,239; adalimumab, n = 538; etanercept, n = 104; ustekinumab, n = 597). The overall drug survival rate in the first year after switching was 77% (95% confidence interval = 74–79%), falling to 58% (55–61%) in the third year. Female sex, multiple comorbidities, concomitant therapy with cyclosporine, and a high Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at switching to the second-line biologic therapy were predictors of overall discontinuation (multivariable Cox proportional hazard model). Compared to adalimumab, patients receiving etanercept were more likely to discontinue therapy (hazard ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval = 1.24–2.83), whereas patients receiving ustekinumab were more likely to persist (hazard ratio = 0.46; 95% confidence interval = 0.33–0.64). Discontinuation of the first biologic therapy because of adverse events was associated with an increased rate of second drug discontinuation because of adverse events (hazard ratio = 2.55; 95% confidence interval = 1.50–4.32). In conclusion, drug survival rates differed among biologic therapies and decreased over time; second-line discontinuation because of adverse events was more common among those who discontinued first-line treatment for this reason. The results of this study should support clinical decision making when choosing second-line biologic therapy for patients with psoriasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5869053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58690532018-04-01 Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) Iskandar, Ireny Y.K. Warren, Richard B. Lunt, Mark Mason, Kayleigh J. Evans, Ian McElhone, Kathleen Smith, Catherine H. Reynolds, Nick J. Ashcroft, Darren M. Griffiths, Christopher E.M. J Invest Dermatol Article Little is known about the drug survival of second-line biologic therapies for psoriasis in routine clinical practice. We assessed drug survival of second-line biologic therapies and estimated the risk of recurrent discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness in patients with psoriasis who had failed a first biologic therapy and switched to a second in a large, multicenter pharmacovigilance registry (n = 1,239; adalimumab, n = 538; etanercept, n = 104; ustekinumab, n = 597). The overall drug survival rate in the first year after switching was 77% (95% confidence interval = 74–79%), falling to 58% (55–61%) in the third year. Female sex, multiple comorbidities, concomitant therapy with cyclosporine, and a high Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at switching to the second-line biologic therapy were predictors of overall discontinuation (multivariable Cox proportional hazard model). Compared to adalimumab, patients receiving etanercept were more likely to discontinue therapy (hazard ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval = 1.24–2.83), whereas patients receiving ustekinumab were more likely to persist (hazard ratio = 0.46; 95% confidence interval = 0.33–0.64). Discontinuation of the first biologic therapy because of adverse events was associated with an increased rate of second drug discontinuation because of adverse events (hazard ratio = 2.55; 95% confidence interval = 1.50–4.32). In conclusion, drug survival rates differed among biologic therapies and decreased over time; second-line discontinuation because of adverse events was more common among those who discontinued first-line treatment for this reason. The results of this study should support clinical decision making when choosing second-line biologic therapy for patients with psoriasis. Elsevier 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5869053/ /pubmed/29080680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.044 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iskandar, Ireny Y.K.
Warren, Richard B.
Lunt, Mark
Mason, Kayleigh J.
Evans, Ian
McElhone, Kathleen
Smith, Catherine H.
Reynolds, Nick J.
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Griffiths, Christopher E.M.
Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title_full Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title_fullStr Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title_full_unstemmed Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title_short Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
title_sort differential drug survival of second-line biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis: observational cohort study from the british association of dermatologists biologic interventions register (badbir)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29080680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.044
work_keys_str_mv AT iskandarirenyyk differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT warrenrichardb differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT luntmark differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT masonkayleighj differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT evansian differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT mcelhonekathleen differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT smithcatherineh differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT reynoldsnickj differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT ashcroftdarrenm differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT griffithschristopherem differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir
AT differentialdrugsurvivalofsecondlinebiologictherapiesinpatientswithpsoriasisobservationalcohortstudyfromthebritishassociationofdermatologistsbiologicinterventionsregisterbadbir