Cargando…

Automatic MRI Quantifying Methods in Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Diagnosis

AIMS: We assessed the value of automated MRI quantification methods in the differential diagnosis of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from Alzheimer disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and subjective memory complaints (SMC). We also examined the role of the C9ORF72-related gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cajanus, Antti, Hall, Anette, Koikkalainen, Juha, Solje, Eino, Tolonen, Antti, Urhemaa, Timo, Liu, Yawu, Haanpää, Ramona M., Hartikainen, Päivi, Helisalmi, Seppo, Korhonen, Ville, Rueckert, Daniel, Hasselbalch, Steen, Waldemar, Gunhild, Mecocci, Patrizia, Vanninen, Ritva, van Gils, Mark, Soininen, Hilkka, Lötjönen, Jyrki, Remes, Anne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000486849
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: We assessed the value of automated MRI quantification methods in the differential diagnosis of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from Alzheimer disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and subjective memory complaints (SMC). We also examined the role of the C9ORF72-related genetic status in the differentiation sensitivity. METHODS: The MRI scans of 50 patients with bvFTD (17 C9ORF72 expansion carriers) were analyzed using 6 quantification methods as follows: voxel-based morphometry (VBM), tensor-based morphometry, volumetry (VOL), manifold learning, grading, and white-matter hyperintensities. Each patient was then individually compared to an independent reference group in order to attain diagnostic suggestions. RESULTS: Only VBM and VOL showed utility in correctly identifying bvFTD from our set of data. The overall classification sensitivity of bvFTD with VOL + VBM achieved a total sensitivity of 60%. Using VOL + VBM, 32% were misclassified as having LBD. There was a trend of higher values for classification sensitivity of the C9ORF72 expansion carriers than noncarriers. CONCLUSION: VOL, VBM, and their combination are effective in differential diagnostics between bvFTD and AD or SMC. However, MRI atrophy profiles for bvFTD and LBD are too similar for a reliable differentiation with the quantification methods tested in this study.