Cargando…

Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations

BACKGROUND: Predictive tools to identify patients at risk for gene mutations related to pituitary adenomas are very helpful in clinical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a reliable risk category system for aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations in patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caimari, Francisca, Hernández-Ramírez, Laura Cristina, Dang, Mary N, Gabrovska, Plamena, Iacovazzo, Donato, Stals, Karen, Ellard, Sian, Korbonits, Márta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104957
_version_ 1783309331850067968
author Caimari, Francisca
Hernández-Ramírez, Laura Cristina
Dang, Mary N
Gabrovska, Plamena
Iacovazzo, Donato
Stals, Karen
Ellard, Sian
Korbonits, Márta
author_facet Caimari, Francisca
Hernández-Ramírez, Laura Cristina
Dang, Mary N
Gabrovska, Plamena
Iacovazzo, Donato
Stals, Karen
Ellard, Sian
Korbonits, Márta
author_sort Caimari, Francisca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predictive tools to identify patients at risk for gene mutations related to pituitary adenomas are very helpful in clinical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a reliable risk category system for aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations in patients with pituitary adenomas. METHODS: An international cohort of 2227 subjects were consecutively recruited between 2007 and 2016, including patients with pituitary adenomas (familial and sporadic) and their relatives. All probands (n=1429) were screened for AIP mutations, and those diagnosed with a pituitary adenoma prospectively, as part of their clinical screening (n=24), were excluded from the analysis. Univariate analysis was performed comparing patients with and without AIP mutations. Based on a multivariate logistic regression model, six potential factors were identified for the development of a risk category system, classifying the individual risk into low-risk, moderate-risk and high-risk categories. An internal cross-validation test was used to validate the system. RESULTS: 1405 patients had a pituitary tumour, of which 43% had a positive family history, 55.5% had somatotrophinomas and 81.5% presented with macroadenoma. Overall, 134 patients had an AIP mutation (9.5%). We identified four independent predictors for the presence of an AIP mutation: age of onset providing an odds ratio (OR) of 14.34 for age 0-18 years, family history (OR 10.85), growth hormone excess (OR 9.74) and large tumour size (OR 4.49). In our cohort, 71% of patients were identified as low risk (<5% risk of AIP mutation), 9.2% as moderate risk and 20% as high risk (≥20% risk). Excellent discrimination (c-statistic=0.87) and internal validation were achieved. CONCLUSION: We propose a user-friendly risk categorisation system that can reliably group patients into high-risk, moderate-risk and low-risk groups for the presence of AIP mutations, thus providing guidance in identifying patients at high risk of carrying an AIP mutation. This risk score is based on a cohort with high prevalence of AIP mutations and should be applied cautiously in other populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5869708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58697082018-03-28 Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations Caimari, Francisca Hernández-Ramírez, Laura Cristina Dang, Mary N Gabrovska, Plamena Iacovazzo, Donato Stals, Karen Ellard, Sian Korbonits, Márta J Med Genet Screening BACKGROUND: Predictive tools to identify patients at risk for gene mutations related to pituitary adenomas are very helpful in clinical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a reliable risk category system for aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations in patients with pituitary adenomas. METHODS: An international cohort of 2227 subjects were consecutively recruited between 2007 and 2016, including patients with pituitary adenomas (familial and sporadic) and their relatives. All probands (n=1429) were screened for AIP mutations, and those diagnosed with a pituitary adenoma prospectively, as part of their clinical screening (n=24), were excluded from the analysis. Univariate analysis was performed comparing patients with and without AIP mutations. Based on a multivariate logistic regression model, six potential factors were identified for the development of a risk category system, classifying the individual risk into low-risk, moderate-risk and high-risk categories. An internal cross-validation test was used to validate the system. RESULTS: 1405 patients had a pituitary tumour, of which 43% had a positive family history, 55.5% had somatotrophinomas and 81.5% presented with macroadenoma. Overall, 134 patients had an AIP mutation (9.5%). We identified four independent predictors for the presence of an AIP mutation: age of onset providing an odds ratio (OR) of 14.34 for age 0-18 years, family history (OR 10.85), growth hormone excess (OR 9.74) and large tumour size (OR 4.49). In our cohort, 71% of patients were identified as low risk (<5% risk of AIP mutation), 9.2% as moderate risk and 20% as high risk (≥20% risk). Excellent discrimination (c-statistic=0.87) and internal validation were achieved. CONCLUSION: We propose a user-friendly risk categorisation system that can reliably group patients into high-risk, moderate-risk and low-risk groups for the presence of AIP mutations, thus providing guidance in identifying patients at high risk of carrying an AIP mutation. This risk score is based on a cohort with high prevalence of AIP mutations and should be applied cautiously in other populations. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04 2018-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5869708/ /pubmed/29440248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104957 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Screening
Caimari, Francisca
Hernández-Ramírez, Laura Cristina
Dang, Mary N
Gabrovska, Plamena
Iacovazzo, Donato
Stals, Karen
Ellard, Sian
Korbonits, Márta
Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title_full Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title_fullStr Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title_full_unstemmed Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title_short Risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with AIP mutations
title_sort risk category system to identify pituitary adenoma patients with aip mutations
topic Screening
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104957
work_keys_str_mv AT caimarifrancisca riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT hernandezramirezlauracristina riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT dangmaryn riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT gabrovskaplamena riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT iacovazzodonato riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT stalskaren riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT ellardsian riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations
AT korbonitsmarta riskcategorysystemtoidentifypituitaryadenomapatientswithaipmutations