Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Malaria causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are several preventive measures that are currently employed, including insecticide-treated nets (ITNs, including long-lasting insecticidal nets and insecticidal-treated bed nets), indoor residual spraying (IRS), prophyla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y |
_version_ | 1783309346994651136 |
---|---|
author | Wangdi, Kinley Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Clark, Justin Barendregt, Jan J. Gatton, Michelle L. Banwell, Cathy Kelly, Gerard C. Doi, Suhail A. R. Clements, Archie C. A. |
author_facet | Wangdi, Kinley Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Clark, Justin Barendregt, Jan J. Gatton, Michelle L. Banwell, Cathy Kelly, Gerard C. Doi, Suhail A. R. Clements, Archie C. A. |
author_sort | Wangdi, Kinley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malaria causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are several preventive measures that are currently employed, including insecticide-treated nets (ITNs, including long-lasting insecticidal nets and insecticidal-treated bed nets), indoor residual spraying (IRS), prophylactic drugs (PD), and untreated nets (UN). However, it is unclear which measure is the most effective for malaria prevention. We therefore undertook a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different preventive measures on incidence of malaria infection. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken across four medical and life sciences databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Web of Science) from their inception to July 2016 to compare the effectiveness of different preventive measures on malaria incidence. Data from the included studies were analysed for the effectiveness of several measures against no intervention (NI). This was carried out using an automated generalized pairwise modeling (GPM) framework for network meta-analysis to generate mixed treatment effects against a common comparator of no intervention (NI). RESULTS: There were 30 studies that met the inclusion criteria from 1998–2016. The GPM framework led to a final ranking of effectiveness of measures in the following order from best to worst: PD, ITN, IRS and UN, in comparison with NI. However, only ITN (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32–0.74) showed precision while other methods [PD (RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.004–15.43), IRS (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.20–1.56) and UN (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.28–1.90)] demonstrating considerable uncertainty associated with their point estimates. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is strong for the protective effect of ITN interventions in malaria prevention. Even though ITNs were found to be the only preventive measure with statistical support for their effectiveness, the role of other malaria control measures may be important adjuncts in the global drive to eliminate malaria. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5869791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58697912018-03-29 Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Wangdi, Kinley Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Clark, Justin Barendregt, Jan J. Gatton, Michelle L. Banwell, Cathy Kelly, Gerard C. Doi, Suhail A. R. Clements, Archie C. A. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Malaria causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are several preventive measures that are currently employed, including insecticide-treated nets (ITNs, including long-lasting insecticidal nets and insecticidal-treated bed nets), indoor residual spraying (IRS), prophylactic drugs (PD), and untreated nets (UN). However, it is unclear which measure is the most effective for malaria prevention. We therefore undertook a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different preventive measures on incidence of malaria infection. METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken across four medical and life sciences databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Web of Science) from their inception to July 2016 to compare the effectiveness of different preventive measures on malaria incidence. Data from the included studies were analysed for the effectiveness of several measures against no intervention (NI). This was carried out using an automated generalized pairwise modeling (GPM) framework for network meta-analysis to generate mixed treatment effects against a common comparator of no intervention (NI). RESULTS: There were 30 studies that met the inclusion criteria from 1998–2016. The GPM framework led to a final ranking of effectiveness of measures in the following order from best to worst: PD, ITN, IRS and UN, in comparison with NI. However, only ITN (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32–0.74) showed precision while other methods [PD (RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.004–15.43), IRS (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.20–1.56) and UN (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.28–1.90)] demonstrating considerable uncertainty associated with their point estimates. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is strong for the protective effect of ITN interventions in malaria prevention. Even though ITNs were found to be the only preventive measure with statistical support for their effectiveness, the role of other malaria control measures may be important adjuncts in the global drive to eliminate malaria. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5869791/ /pubmed/29587882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wangdi, Kinley Furuya-Kanamori, Luis Clark, Justin Barendregt, Jan J. Gatton, Michelle L. Banwell, Cathy Kelly, Gerard C. Doi, Suhail A. R. Clements, Archie C. A. Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangdikinley comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT furuyakanamoriluis comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT clarkjustin comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT barendregtjanj comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gattonmichellel comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT banwellcathy comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kellygerardc comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT doisuhailar comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT clementsarchieca comparativeeffectivenessofmalariapreventionmeasuresasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |