Cargando…
Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science
Over a decade ago, the Society for Prevention Research endorsed the first standards of evidence for research in preventive interventions. The growing recognition of the need to use limited resources to make sound investments in prevention led the Board of Directors to charge a new task force to set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1 |
_version_ | 1783309356533547008 |
---|---|
author | Crowley, D. Max Dodge, Kenneth A. Barnett, W. Steven Corso, Phaedra Duffy, Sarah Graham, Phillip Greenberg, Mark Haskins, Ron Hill, Laura Jones, Damon E. Karoly, Lynn A. Kuklinski, Margaret R. Plotnick, Robert |
author_facet | Crowley, D. Max Dodge, Kenneth A. Barnett, W. Steven Corso, Phaedra Duffy, Sarah Graham, Phillip Greenberg, Mark Haskins, Ron Hill, Laura Jones, Damon E. Karoly, Lynn A. Kuklinski, Margaret R. Plotnick, Robert |
author_sort | Crowley, D. Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over a decade ago, the Society for Prevention Research endorsed the first standards of evidence for research in preventive interventions. The growing recognition of the need to use limited resources to make sound investments in prevention led the Board of Directors to charge a new task force to set standards for research in analysis of the economic impact of preventive interventions. This article reports the findings of this group’s deliberations, proposes standards for economic analyses, and identifies opportunities for future prevention science. Through examples, policymakers’ need and use of economic analysis are described. Standards are proposed for framing economic analysis, estimating costs of prevention programs, estimating benefits of prevention programs, implementing summary metrics, handling uncertainty in estimates, and reporting findings. Topics for research in economic analysis are identified. The SPR Board of Directors endorses the “Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science.” ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5869868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58698682018-03-28 Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science Crowley, D. Max Dodge, Kenneth A. Barnett, W. Steven Corso, Phaedra Duffy, Sarah Graham, Phillip Greenberg, Mark Haskins, Ron Hill, Laura Jones, Damon E. Karoly, Lynn A. Kuklinski, Margaret R. Plotnick, Robert Prev Sci Article Over a decade ago, the Society for Prevention Research endorsed the first standards of evidence for research in preventive interventions. The growing recognition of the need to use limited resources to make sound investments in prevention led the Board of Directors to charge a new task force to set standards for research in analysis of the economic impact of preventive interventions. This article reports the findings of this group’s deliberations, proposes standards for economic analyses, and identifies opportunities for future prevention science. Through examples, policymakers’ need and use of economic analysis are described. Standards are proposed for framing economic analysis, estimating costs of prevention programs, estimating benefits of prevention programs, implementing summary metrics, handling uncertainty in estimates, and reporting findings. Topics for research in economic analysis are identified. The SPR Board of Directors endorses the “Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science.” ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-02-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5869868/ /pubmed/29435786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Crowley, D. Max Dodge, Kenneth A. Barnett, W. Steven Corso, Phaedra Duffy, Sarah Graham, Phillip Greenberg, Mark Haskins, Ron Hill, Laura Jones, Damon E. Karoly, Lynn A. Kuklinski, Margaret R. Plotnick, Robert Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title | Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title_full | Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title_fullStr | Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title_short | Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science |
title_sort | standards of evidence for conducting and reporting economic evaluations in prevention science |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crowleydmax standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT dodgekennetha standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT barnettwsteven standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT corsophaedra standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT duffysarah standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT grahamphillip standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT greenbergmark standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT haskinsron standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT hilllaura standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT jonesdamone standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT karolylynna standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT kuklinskimargaretr standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience AT plotnickrobert standardsofevidenceforconductingandreportingeconomicevaluationsinpreventionscience |