Cargando…

The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI

The challenges of research into brain–computer interfaces (BCI) include significant individual differences in learning pace and in the effective operation of BCI devices. The use of neurofeedback training is a popular method of improving the effectiveness BCI operation. The purpose of the present st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapała, Dariusz, Francuz, Piotr, Zapała, Ewelina, Kopiś, Natalia, Wierzgała, Piotr, Augustynowicz, Paweł, Majkowski, Andrzej, Kołodziej, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9383-z
_version_ 1783309359597486080
author Zapała, Dariusz
Francuz, Piotr
Zapała, Ewelina
Kopiś, Natalia
Wierzgała, Piotr
Augustynowicz, Paweł
Majkowski, Andrzej
Kołodziej, Marcin
author_facet Zapała, Dariusz
Francuz, Piotr
Zapała, Ewelina
Kopiś, Natalia
Wierzgała, Piotr
Augustynowicz, Paweł
Majkowski, Andrzej
Kołodziej, Marcin
author_sort Zapała, Dariusz
collection PubMed
description The challenges of research into brain–computer interfaces (BCI) include significant individual differences in learning pace and in the effective operation of BCI devices. The use of neurofeedback training is a popular method of improving the effectiveness BCI operation. The purpose of the present study was to determine to what extent it is possible to improve the effectiveness of operation of sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interfaces (SMR-BCI) by supplementing user training with elements modifying the characteristics of visual feedback. Four experimental groups had training designed to reinforce BCI control by: visual feedback in the form of dummy faces expressing emotions (Group 1); flashing the principal elements of visual feedback (Group 2) and giving both visual feedbacks in one condition (Group 3). The fourth group participated in training with no modifications (Group 4). Training consisted of a series of trials where the subjects directed a ball into a basket located to the right or left side of the screen. In Group 1 a schematic image a face, placed on the controlled object, showed various emotions, depending on the accuracy of control. In Group 2, the cue and targets were flashed with different frequency (4 Hz) than the remaining elements visible on the monitor. Both modifications were also used simultaneously in Group 3. SMR activity during the task was recorded before and after the training. In Group 3 there was a significant improvement in SMR control, compared to subjects in Group 2 and 4 (control). Differences between subjects in Groups 1, 2 and 4 (control) were insignificant. This means that relatively small changes in the training procedure may significantly impact the effectiveness of BCI control. Analysis of behavioural data acquired from all participants at training showed greater effectiveness in directing the object towards the right side of the screen. Subjects with the greatest improvement in SMR control showed a significantly lower difference in the accuracy of rightward and leftward movement than others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5869881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58698812018-03-28 The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI Zapała, Dariusz Francuz, Piotr Zapała, Ewelina Kopiś, Natalia Wierzgała, Piotr Augustynowicz, Paweł Majkowski, Andrzej Kołodziej, Marcin Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article The challenges of research into brain–computer interfaces (BCI) include significant individual differences in learning pace and in the effective operation of BCI devices. The use of neurofeedback training is a popular method of improving the effectiveness BCI operation. The purpose of the present study was to determine to what extent it is possible to improve the effectiveness of operation of sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interfaces (SMR-BCI) by supplementing user training with elements modifying the characteristics of visual feedback. Four experimental groups had training designed to reinforce BCI control by: visual feedback in the form of dummy faces expressing emotions (Group 1); flashing the principal elements of visual feedback (Group 2) and giving both visual feedbacks in one condition (Group 3). The fourth group participated in training with no modifications (Group 4). Training consisted of a series of trials where the subjects directed a ball into a basket located to the right or left side of the screen. In Group 1 a schematic image a face, placed on the controlled object, showed various emotions, depending on the accuracy of control. In Group 2, the cue and targets were flashed with different frequency (4 Hz) than the remaining elements visible on the monitor. Both modifications were also used simultaneously in Group 3. SMR activity during the task was recorded before and after the training. In Group 3 there was a significant improvement in SMR control, compared to subjects in Group 2 and 4 (control). Differences between subjects in Groups 1, 2 and 4 (control) were insignificant. This means that relatively small changes in the training procedure may significantly impact the effectiveness of BCI control. Analysis of behavioural data acquired from all participants at training showed greater effectiveness in directing the object towards the right side of the screen. Subjects with the greatest improvement in SMR control showed a significantly lower difference in the accuracy of rightward and leftward movement than others. Springer US 2017-10-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5869881/ /pubmed/29075937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9383-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Zapała, Dariusz
Francuz, Piotr
Zapała, Ewelina
Kopiś, Natalia
Wierzgała, Piotr
Augustynowicz, Paweł
Majkowski, Andrzej
Kołodziej, Marcin
The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title_full The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title_fullStr The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title_short The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI
title_sort impact of different visual feedbacks in user training on motor imagery control in bci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9383-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zapaładariusz theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT francuzpiotr theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT zapałaewelina theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT kopisnatalia theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT wierzgałapiotr theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT augustynowiczpaweł theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT majkowskiandrzej theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT kołodziejmarcin theimpactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT zapaładariusz impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT francuzpiotr impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT zapałaewelina impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT kopisnatalia impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT wierzgałapiotr impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT augustynowiczpaweł impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT majkowskiandrzej impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci
AT kołodziejmarcin impactofdifferentvisualfeedbacksinusertrainingonmotorimagerycontrolinbci