Cargando…

Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task

RATIONALE: Maladaptive impulsivity is symptomatic of several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and substance abuse disorders; paradigms designed to assess the underlying neurobiology of this behavior are essential for the discovery o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow, Rebecca L., Dalley, Jeffrey W., Pekcec, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4836-5
_version_ 1783309361953636352
author Barlow, Rebecca L.
Dalley, Jeffrey W.
Pekcec, Anton
author_facet Barlow, Rebecca L.
Dalley, Jeffrey W.
Pekcec, Anton
author_sort Barlow, Rebecca L.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Maladaptive impulsivity is symptomatic of several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and substance abuse disorders; paradigms designed to assess the underlying neurobiology of this behavior are essential for the discovery of novel therapeutic agents. Various models may be used to assess impulsivity as measured by the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), including variable inter-trial interval (ITI) sessions, the selection of extreme high and low impulsivity phenotypes from a large outbred population of rats, as well as pharmacological challenges. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate if pharmacological challenge models for impulsivity are biased by underlying differences in impulsivity phenotype. METHODS: Extreme high and low impulsivity phenotypes were selected in the 5-CSRTT, and dose-dependent effects of various pharmacological challenges, namely MK-801, yohimbine, and cocaine, were evaluated on task performance, specifically accuracy and premature responses. RESULTS: All three compounds increased premature responding, while a decrease in attentional performance occurred following MK-801 and yohimbine administration. No differences in drug-induced impulsivity between rats selected for high or low impulsivity or in parameters indicative of attentional performance could be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that different pharmacological challenges increase impulsivity on the 5-CSRTT, with modest effects on attention. These effects were not influenced by underlying differences in impulsivity phenotype, which is an important prerequisite to reliably use these challenge models to screen and profile compounds with putative anti-impulsive characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5869891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58698912018-03-28 Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task Barlow, Rebecca L. Dalley, Jeffrey W. Pekcec, Anton Psychopharmacology (Berl) Original Investigation RATIONALE: Maladaptive impulsivity is symptomatic of several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and substance abuse disorders; paradigms designed to assess the underlying neurobiology of this behavior are essential for the discovery of novel therapeutic agents. Various models may be used to assess impulsivity as measured by the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), including variable inter-trial interval (ITI) sessions, the selection of extreme high and low impulsivity phenotypes from a large outbred population of rats, as well as pharmacological challenges. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate if pharmacological challenge models for impulsivity are biased by underlying differences in impulsivity phenotype. METHODS: Extreme high and low impulsivity phenotypes were selected in the 5-CSRTT, and dose-dependent effects of various pharmacological challenges, namely MK-801, yohimbine, and cocaine, were evaluated on task performance, specifically accuracy and premature responses. RESULTS: All three compounds increased premature responding, while a decrease in attentional performance occurred following MK-801 and yohimbine administration. No differences in drug-induced impulsivity between rats selected for high or low impulsivity or in parameters indicative of attentional performance could be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that different pharmacological challenges increase impulsivity on the 5-CSRTT, with modest effects on attention. These effects were not influenced by underlying differences in impulsivity phenotype, which is an important prerequisite to reliably use these challenge models to screen and profile compounds with putative anti-impulsive characteristics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-01-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5869891/ /pubmed/29374304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4836-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Barlow, Rebecca L.
Dalley, Jeffrey W.
Pekcec, Anton
Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title_full Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title_fullStr Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title_full_unstemmed Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title_short Differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
title_sort differences in trait impulsivity do not bias the response to pharmacological drug challenge in the rat five-choice serial reaction time task
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4836-5
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowrebeccal differencesintraitimpulsivitydonotbiastheresponsetopharmacologicaldrugchallengeintheratfivechoiceserialreactiontimetask
AT dalleyjeffreyw differencesintraitimpulsivitydonotbiastheresponsetopharmacologicaldrugchallengeintheratfivechoiceserialreactiontimetask
AT pekcecanton differencesintraitimpulsivitydonotbiastheresponsetopharmacologicaldrugchallengeintheratfivechoiceserialreactiontimetask