Cargando…
Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: For several tumor entities, automated treatment planning has improved plan quality and planning efficiency, and may enable adaptive treatment approaches. Whole-pelvic prostate radiotherapy (WPRT) involves large concave target volumes, which present a challenge for volumetric arc therapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2 |
_version_ | 1783309362422349824 |
---|---|
author | Buschmann, Martin Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M. Penninkhof, Joan Seppenwoolde, Yvette Goldner, Gregor Georg, Dietmar Breedveld, Sebastiaan Heijmen, Ben J. M. |
author_facet | Buschmann, Martin Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M. Penninkhof, Joan Seppenwoolde, Yvette Goldner, Gregor Georg, Dietmar Breedveld, Sebastiaan Heijmen, Ben J. M. |
author_sort | Buschmann, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For several tumor entities, automated treatment planning has improved plan quality and planning efficiency, and may enable adaptive treatment approaches. Whole-pelvic prostate radiotherapy (WPRT) involves large concave target volumes, which present a challenge for volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) optimization. This study evaluates automated VMAT planning for WPRT-VMAT and compares the results with manual expert planning. METHODS: A system for fully automated multi-criterial plan generation was configured for each step of sequential-boost WPRT-VMAT, with final “autoVMAT” plans being automatically calculated by the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Configuration was based on manually generated VMAT plans (manualVMAT) of 5 test patients, the planning protocol, and discussions with the treating physician on wishes for plan improvements. AutoVMAT plans were then generated for another 30 evaluation patients and compared to manualVMAT plans. For all 35 patients, manualVMAT plans were optimized by expert planners using the Monaco TPS. RESULTS: AutoVMAT plans exhibited strongly improved organ sparing and higher conformity compared to manualVMAT. On average, mean doses (D(mean)) of bladder and rectum were reduced by 10.7 and 4.5 Gy, respectively, by autoVMAT. Prostate target coverage (V(95%)) was slightly higher (+0.6%) with manualVMAT. In a blinded scoring session, the radiation oncologist preferred autoVMAT plans to manualVMAT plans for 27/30 patients. All treatment plans were considered clinically acceptable. The workload per patient was reduced by > 70 min. CONCLUSION: Automated VMAT planning for complex WPRT dose distributions is feasible and creates treatment plans that are generally dosimetrically superior to manually optimized plans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5869893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58698932018-03-28 Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy Buschmann, Martin Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M. Penninkhof, Joan Seppenwoolde, Yvette Goldner, Gregor Georg, Dietmar Breedveld, Sebastiaan Heijmen, Ben J. M. Strahlenther Onkol Original Article BACKGROUND: For several tumor entities, automated treatment planning has improved plan quality and planning efficiency, and may enable adaptive treatment approaches. Whole-pelvic prostate radiotherapy (WPRT) involves large concave target volumes, which present a challenge for volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) optimization. This study evaluates automated VMAT planning for WPRT-VMAT and compares the results with manual expert planning. METHODS: A system for fully automated multi-criterial plan generation was configured for each step of sequential-boost WPRT-VMAT, with final “autoVMAT” plans being automatically calculated by the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Configuration was based on manually generated VMAT plans (manualVMAT) of 5 test patients, the planning protocol, and discussions with the treating physician on wishes for plan improvements. AutoVMAT plans were then generated for another 30 evaluation patients and compared to manualVMAT plans. For all 35 patients, manualVMAT plans were optimized by expert planners using the Monaco TPS. RESULTS: AutoVMAT plans exhibited strongly improved organ sparing and higher conformity compared to manualVMAT. On average, mean doses (D(mean)) of bladder and rectum were reduced by 10.7 and 4.5 Gy, respectively, by autoVMAT. Prostate target coverage (V(95%)) was slightly higher (+0.6%) with manualVMAT. In a blinded scoring session, the radiation oncologist preferred autoVMAT plans to manualVMAT plans for 27/30 patients. All treatment plans were considered clinically acceptable. The workload per patient was reduced by > 70 min. CONCLUSION: Automated VMAT planning for complex WPRT dose distributions is feasible and creates treatment plans that are generally dosimetrically superior to manually optimized plans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5869893/ /pubmed/29270648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Buschmann, Martin Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M. Penninkhof, Joan Seppenwoolde, Yvette Goldner, Gregor Georg, Dietmar Breedveld, Sebastiaan Heijmen, Ben J. M. Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title | Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title_full | Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title_short | Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
title_sort | automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5869893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buschmannmartin automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT sharfoabdulwahabm automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT penninkhofjoan automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT seppenwooldeyvette automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT goldnergregor automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT georgdietmar automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT breedveldsebastiaan automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy AT heijmenbenjm automatedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyplanningforwholepelvicprostateradiotherapy |