Cargando…
The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease
The New Criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), published by a group of experts in 2007, have resulted in a revolution in the comprehension of the disease. Before 2007, the diagnosis of AD dementia was done through a process of exclusion: it was considered in the case of patients wit...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170536 |
_version_ | 1783309387894358016 |
---|---|
author | Dubois, Bruno |
author_facet | Dubois, Bruno |
author_sort | Dubois, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | The New Criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), published by a group of experts in 2007, have resulted in a revolution in the comprehension of the disease. Before 2007, the diagnosis of AD dementia was done through a process of exclusion: it was considered in the case of patients with a dementia syndrome without identified etiologies. This traditional algorithm had three major limitations that penalize the disease: 1) a low accuracy of the performance which may share responsibility for negative results in clinical trials; 2) a late identification of the patients only when they reach the threshold of dementia which may delay the activation of optimal care; and last but not least, 3) an absence of clear recognition of AD as a disease because of the lack of specific arguments for its identification. Since 2007, the disease has gained a clear definition based on positive evidence: a specific clinical phenotype (the amnestic syndrome of the hippocampal type) and the presence of biomarkers, considered as a biological signature of the disease. Thanks to these positive arguments, AD is a clinically and biologically well-delineated disease, no longer defined as “probable”. It is now possible to certify that a given patient has or does not have the disease. Like diabetes, cancer, hyperthyroidism or any other disorder, AD has now a clear definition with well-defined borders. The disease has entered the world of medicine with identified diseases with a biological fingerprint. This is the story of this adventure that we will present now. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5870001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58700012018-03-29 The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Dubois, Bruno J Alzheimers Dis Review The New Criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), published by a group of experts in 2007, have resulted in a revolution in the comprehension of the disease. Before 2007, the diagnosis of AD dementia was done through a process of exclusion: it was considered in the case of patients with a dementia syndrome without identified etiologies. This traditional algorithm had three major limitations that penalize the disease: 1) a low accuracy of the performance which may share responsibility for negative results in clinical trials; 2) a late identification of the patients only when they reach the threshold of dementia which may delay the activation of optimal care; and last but not least, 3) an absence of clear recognition of AD as a disease because of the lack of specific arguments for its identification. Since 2007, the disease has gained a clear definition based on positive evidence: a specific clinical phenotype (the amnestic syndrome of the hippocampal type) and the presence of biomarkers, considered as a biological signature of the disease. Thanks to these positive arguments, AD is a clinically and biologically well-delineated disease, no longer defined as “probable”. It is now possible to certify that a given patient has or does not have the disease. Like diabetes, cancer, hyperthyroidism or any other disorder, AD has now a clear definition with well-defined borders. The disease has entered the world of medicine with identified diseases with a biological fingerprint. This is the story of this adventure that we will present now. IOS Press 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5870001/ /pubmed/29036825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170536 Text en © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Dubois, Bruno The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title | The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full | The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_fullStr | The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_short | The Emergence of a New Conceptual Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_sort | emergence of a new conceptual framework for alzheimer’s disease |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duboisbruno theemergenceofanewconceptualframeworkforalzheimersdisease AT duboisbruno emergenceofanewconceptualframeworkforalzheimersdisease |