Cargando…
Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study
BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 15–24% of women and can have a devastating impact on quality of life. Laparoscopy is often used in the investigation, although in one third of the examinations there is no visible pathology and the women may be dismissed without further investigation. Al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0542-z |
_version_ | 1783309404625436672 |
---|---|
author | Torstensson, Thomas Butler, Stephen Lindgren, Anne Peterson, Magnus Nilsson-Wikmar, Lena Eriksson, Margaretha Kristiansson, Per |
author_facet | Torstensson, Thomas Butler, Stephen Lindgren, Anne Peterson, Magnus Nilsson-Wikmar, Lena Eriksson, Margaretha Kristiansson, Per |
author_sort | Torstensson, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 15–24% of women and can have a devastating impact on quality of life. Laparoscopy is often used in the investigation, although in one third of the examinations there is no visible pathology and the women may be dismissed without further investigation. Also, the contribution of skeletal, muscular, periosteal and ligamentous tissues to CPP remains to be further elucidated. The objective of the present study was to compare pain intensity provoked from anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall in women with pregnancy-related CPP after childbirth and women without such pain. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of 36 non-randomly selected parous women with CPP after childbirth and 29 likewise selected parous women after childbirth without CPP. Pain was determined by questionnaire and clinical examination. The primary outcome measure was reported pain intensity provoked on 13 anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall. All women reported their perceived pain intensity for each anatomical landmark on Likert scales and an individual sum score was calculated. RESULTS: Women with chronic pelvic pain were older than women without CPP. At several intra-pelvic landmarks high intensity pain was provoked in women with CPP compared with less intense pain provoked at fewer landmarks in women without low back or pelvic pain (p < 0.0001). The average sum of pain intensity scores was about 4 times higher in women with CPP (1.3) as compared with those without low back or pelvic pain (0.3), p < 0.0001. This association remained when adjusting for the age difference between the pain groups in linear regression analysis. In addition, reported pain intensity at worst past week was independently associated with sum of pain intensity scores. The maximum individual sum of pain intensity scores among women without CPP was exceeded by that of 85% of the women with CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Parous women with CPP after childbirth had a heightened pain intensity over 13 anatomical landmarks during pelvic examination compared with parous women without CPP. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort with different types of CPP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5870072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58700722018-03-29 Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study Torstensson, Thomas Butler, Stephen Lindgren, Anne Peterson, Magnus Nilsson-Wikmar, Lena Eriksson, Margaretha Kristiansson, Per BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 15–24% of women and can have a devastating impact on quality of life. Laparoscopy is often used in the investigation, although in one third of the examinations there is no visible pathology and the women may be dismissed without further investigation. Also, the contribution of skeletal, muscular, periosteal and ligamentous tissues to CPP remains to be further elucidated. The objective of the present study was to compare pain intensity provoked from anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall in women with pregnancy-related CPP after childbirth and women without such pain. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of 36 non-randomly selected parous women with CPP after childbirth and 29 likewise selected parous women after childbirth without CPP. Pain was determined by questionnaire and clinical examination. The primary outcome measure was reported pain intensity provoked on 13 anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall. All women reported their perceived pain intensity for each anatomical landmark on Likert scales and an individual sum score was calculated. RESULTS: Women with chronic pelvic pain were older than women without CPP. At several intra-pelvic landmarks high intensity pain was provoked in women with CPP compared with less intense pain provoked at fewer landmarks in women without low back or pelvic pain (p < 0.0001). The average sum of pain intensity scores was about 4 times higher in women with CPP (1.3) as compared with those without low back or pelvic pain (0.3), p < 0.0001. This association remained when adjusting for the age difference between the pain groups in linear regression analysis. In addition, reported pain intensity at worst past week was independently associated with sum of pain intensity scores. The maximum individual sum of pain intensity scores among women without CPP was exceeded by that of 85% of the women with CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Parous women with CPP after childbirth had a heightened pain intensity over 13 anatomical landmarks during pelvic examination compared with parous women without CPP. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort with different types of CPP. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870072/ /pubmed/29587728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0542-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Torstensson, Thomas Butler, Stephen Lindgren, Anne Peterson, Magnus Nilsson-Wikmar, Lena Eriksson, Margaretha Kristiansson, Per Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title | Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title_full | Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title_fullStr | Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title_short | Anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
title_sort | anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall as sources of pain in women with and without pregnancy-related chronic pelvic pain after childbirth: a descriptive study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0542-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torstenssonthomas anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT butlerstephen anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT lindgrenanne anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT petersonmagnus anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT nilssonwikmarlena anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT erikssonmargaretha anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy AT kristianssonper anatomicallandmarksoftheintrapelvicsidewallassourcesofpaininwomenwithandwithoutpregnancyrelatedchronicpelvicpainafterchildbirthadescriptivestudy |