Cargando…

Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention strategies for patient-centered outcomes research are evolving and research on the subject is limited. In this work, we present a conceptual model of patient-centered recruitment and retention, and describe the recruitment and retention activities and related ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhatre, Sumedha, Jefferson, Ashlie, Cook, Ratna, Meeker, Caitlin R., Kim, Ji Hyun, Hartz, Kayla Marie, Wong, Yu-Ning, Caruso, Adele, Newman, Diane K., Morales, Knashawn H., Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2578-7
_version_ 1783309427412041728
author Chhatre, Sumedha
Jefferson, Ashlie
Cook, Ratna
Meeker, Caitlin R.
Kim, Ji Hyun
Hartz, Kayla Marie
Wong, Yu-Ning
Caruso, Adele
Newman, Diane K.
Morales, Knashawn H.
Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
author_facet Chhatre, Sumedha
Jefferson, Ashlie
Cook, Ratna
Meeker, Caitlin R.
Kim, Ji Hyun
Hartz, Kayla Marie
Wong, Yu-Ning
Caruso, Adele
Newman, Diane K.
Morales, Knashawn H.
Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
author_sort Chhatre, Sumedha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention strategies for patient-centered outcomes research are evolving and research on the subject is limited. In this work, we present a conceptual model of patient-centered recruitment and retention, and describe the recruitment and retention activities and related challenges in a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial. METHODS: This is a multicenter, longitudinal randomized controlled trial in localized prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: We recruited 743 participants from three sites over 15 months period (January 2014 to March 2015), and followed them for 24 months. At site 1, of the 773 eligible participants, 551 (72%) were enrolled. At site 2, 34 participants were eligible and 23 (68%) enrolled. Of the 434 eligible participants at site 3, 169 (39%) enrolled. We observed that strategies related to the concepts of trust (e.g., physician involvement, ensuring protection of information), communication (e.g., brochures and pamphlets in physicians’ offices, continued contact during regular clinic visits and calling/emailing assessment), attitude (e.g., emphasizing the altruistic value of research, positive attitude of providers and research staff), and expectations (e.g., full disclosure of study requirements and time commitment, update letters) facilitated successful patient recruitment and retention. A stakeholders’ advisory board provided important input for the recruitment and retention activities. Active engagement, reminders at the offices, and personalized update letters helped retention during follow-up. Usefulness of telephone recruitment was site specific and, at one site, the time requirement for telephone recruitment was a challenge. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented multilevel strategies for successful recruitment and retention in a clinical trial using a patient-centered approach. Our strategies were flexible to accommodate site-level requirements. These strategies as well as the challenges can aid recruitment and retention efforts of future large-scale, patient-centered research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT02032550. Registered on 22 November 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58701942018-03-29 Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study Chhatre, Sumedha Jefferson, Ashlie Cook, Ratna Meeker, Caitlin R. Kim, Ji Hyun Hartz, Kayla Marie Wong, Yu-Ning Caruso, Adele Newman, Diane K. Morales, Knashawn H. Jayadevappa, Ravishankar Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention strategies for patient-centered outcomes research are evolving and research on the subject is limited. In this work, we present a conceptual model of patient-centered recruitment and retention, and describe the recruitment and retention activities and related challenges in a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial. METHODS: This is a multicenter, longitudinal randomized controlled trial in localized prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: We recruited 743 participants from three sites over 15 months period (January 2014 to March 2015), and followed them for 24 months. At site 1, of the 773 eligible participants, 551 (72%) were enrolled. At site 2, 34 participants were eligible and 23 (68%) enrolled. Of the 434 eligible participants at site 3, 169 (39%) enrolled. We observed that strategies related to the concepts of trust (e.g., physician involvement, ensuring protection of information), communication (e.g., brochures and pamphlets in physicians’ offices, continued contact during regular clinic visits and calling/emailing assessment), attitude (e.g., emphasizing the altruistic value of research, positive attitude of providers and research staff), and expectations (e.g., full disclosure of study requirements and time commitment, update letters) facilitated successful patient recruitment and retention. A stakeholders’ advisory board provided important input for the recruitment and retention activities. Active engagement, reminders at the offices, and personalized update letters helped retention during follow-up. Usefulness of telephone recruitment was site specific and, at one site, the time requirement for telephone recruitment was a challenge. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented multilevel strategies for successful recruitment and retention in a clinical trial using a patient-centered approach. Our strategies were flexible to accommodate site-level requirements. These strategies as well as the challenges can aid recruitment and retention efforts of future large-scale, patient-centered research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT02032550. Registered on 22 November 2013. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870194/ /pubmed/29587805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2578-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chhatre, Sumedha
Jefferson, Ashlie
Cook, Ratna
Meeker, Caitlin R.
Kim, Ji Hyun
Hartz, Kayla Marie
Wong, Yu-Ning
Caruso, Adele
Newman, Diane K.
Morales, Knashawn H.
Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title_full Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title_short Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
title_sort patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2578-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chhatresumedha patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jeffersonashlie patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT cookratna patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT meekercaitlinr patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimjihyun patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hartzkaylamarie patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wongyuning patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT carusoadele patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT newmandianek patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT moralesknashawnh patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jayadevapparavishankar patientcenteredrecruitmentandretentionforarandomizedcontrolledstudy