Cargando…
A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2 |
_version_ | 1783309430194962432 |
---|---|
author | Hernández-Vásquez, Akram Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A. Bendezu-Quispe, Guido Comandé, Daniel Rosselli, Diego |
author_facet | Hernández-Vásquez, Akram Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A. Bendezu-Quispe, Guido Comandé, Daniel Rosselli, Diego |
author_sort | Hernández-Vásquez, Akram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We performed a bibliometric analysis using documents about biosimilars published until December 2016 in journals indexed in Scopus. We extracted the annual research, languages, countries, journals, authors, institutions, citation frequency, and the metrics of journals. The data were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Additional information about authors' participation was obtained using the R-package Bibliometrix. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size. Also, author co-citation analysis and a term co-occurrence analysis with the terms included in the title and abstract of publications was presented as network visualization maps using VOSviewer. RESULTS: A total of 2330 biosimilar-related documents identified in the Scopus database, most of them were articles (1452; 62.32%). The number of documents published had an exponential increased between 2004 and 2016 (p < 0.001). The United States was the country with the highest production with 685 (29.40%) documents followed by Germany and UK with 293 (12.58%) and 248 (10.64%), respectively. Switzerland (11.05), Netherlands (5.85) and UK (3.83) showed the highest per capita ratio. The highest citation/article ratio were for the Netherlands (28.06), Spain (24.23), and France (20.11). Gabi Journal published 73 (3.13%) documents; both Biopharm International and Pharmaceutical Technology and Mabs, 41 (1.76%). Three out of top ten journals were Trade publications. Amgen Incorporated from the USA was the most prolific institution with 51 documents followed by Pfizer Inc. with 48. Terms about specific diseases and drugs were found in recent years, compared with terms such as legislation, structure, protein, dose and generic in the early years. CONCLUSIONS: Research production and publication of documents on biosimilars are increasing. The majority of publications came from high-income countries. The trends in terminology use are according to state of the art in the topic, and reflects the interest in the utilization of biosimilars in diseases who are expected to obtain benefits of its use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5870206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58702062018-03-29 A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars Hernández-Vásquez, Akram Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A. Bendezu-Quispe, Guido Comandé, Daniel Rosselli, Diego J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We performed a bibliometric analysis using documents about biosimilars published until December 2016 in journals indexed in Scopus. We extracted the annual research, languages, countries, journals, authors, institutions, citation frequency, and the metrics of journals. The data were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Additional information about authors' participation was obtained using the R-package Bibliometrix. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size. Also, author co-citation analysis and a term co-occurrence analysis with the terms included in the title and abstract of publications was presented as network visualization maps using VOSviewer. RESULTS: A total of 2330 biosimilar-related documents identified in the Scopus database, most of them were articles (1452; 62.32%). The number of documents published had an exponential increased between 2004 and 2016 (p < 0.001). The United States was the country with the highest production with 685 (29.40%) documents followed by Germany and UK with 293 (12.58%) and 248 (10.64%), respectively. Switzerland (11.05), Netherlands (5.85) and UK (3.83) showed the highest per capita ratio. The highest citation/article ratio were for the Netherlands (28.06), Spain (24.23), and France (20.11). Gabi Journal published 73 (3.13%) documents; both Biopharm International and Pharmaceutical Technology and Mabs, 41 (1.76%). Three out of top ten journals were Trade publications. Amgen Incorporated from the USA was the most prolific institution with 51 documents followed by Pfizer Inc. with 48. Terms about specific diseases and drugs were found in recent years, compared with terms such as legislation, structure, protein, dose and generic in the early years. CONCLUSIONS: Research production and publication of documents on biosimilars are increasing. The majority of publications came from high-income countries. The trends in terminology use are according to state of the art in the topic, and reflects the interest in the utilization of biosimilars in diseases who are expected to obtain benefits of its use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870206/ /pubmed/29599984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hernández-Vásquez, Akram Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A. Bendezu-Quispe, Guido Comandé, Daniel Rosselli, Diego A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title | A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title_full | A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title_fullStr | A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title_full_unstemmed | A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title_short | A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hernandezvasquezakram abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT alarconruizchristopera abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT bendezuquispeguido abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT comandedaniel abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT rossellidiego abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT hernandezvasquezakram bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT alarconruizchristopera bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT bendezuquispeguido bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT comandedaniel bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars AT rossellidiego bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars |