Cargando…

A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Vásquez, Akram, Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A., Bendezu-Quispe, Guido, Comandé, Daniel, Rosselli, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2
_version_ 1783309430194962432
author Hernández-Vásquez, Akram
Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A.
Bendezu-Quispe, Guido
Comandé, Daniel
Rosselli, Diego
author_facet Hernández-Vásquez, Akram
Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A.
Bendezu-Quispe, Guido
Comandé, Daniel
Rosselli, Diego
author_sort Hernández-Vásquez, Akram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We performed a bibliometric analysis using documents about biosimilars published until December 2016 in journals indexed in Scopus. We extracted the annual research, languages, countries, journals, authors, institutions, citation frequency, and the metrics of journals. The data were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Additional information about authors' participation was obtained using the R-package Bibliometrix. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size. Also, author co-citation analysis and a term co-occurrence analysis with the terms included in the title and abstract of publications was presented as network visualization maps using VOSviewer. RESULTS: A total of 2330 biosimilar-related documents identified in the Scopus database, most of them were articles (1452; 62.32%). The number of documents published had an exponential increased between 2004 and 2016 (p < 0.001). The United States was the country with the highest production with 685 (29.40%) documents followed by Germany and UK with 293 (12.58%) and 248 (10.64%), respectively. Switzerland (11.05), Netherlands (5.85) and UK (3.83) showed the highest per capita ratio. The highest citation/article ratio were for the Netherlands (28.06), Spain (24.23), and France (20.11). Gabi Journal published 73 (3.13%) documents; both Biopharm International and Pharmaceutical Technology and Mabs, 41 (1.76%). Three out of top ten journals were Trade publications. Amgen Incorporated from the USA was the most prolific institution with 51 documents followed by Pfizer Inc. with 48. Terms about specific diseases and drugs were found in recent years, compared with terms such as legislation, structure, protein, dose and generic in the early years. CONCLUSIONS: Research production and publication of documents on biosimilars are increasing. The majority of publications came from high-income countries. The trends in terminology use are according to state of the art in the topic, and reflects the interest in the utilization of biosimilars in diseases who are expected to obtain benefits of its use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58702062018-03-29 A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars Hernández-Vásquez, Akram Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A. Bendezu-Quispe, Guido Comandé, Daniel Rosselli, Diego J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research. METHODS: We performed a bibliometric analysis using documents about biosimilars published until December 2016 in journals indexed in Scopus. We extracted the annual research, languages, countries, journals, authors, institutions, citation frequency, and the metrics of journals. The data were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Additional information about authors' participation was obtained using the R-package Bibliometrix. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size. Also, author co-citation analysis and a term co-occurrence analysis with the terms included in the title and abstract of publications was presented as network visualization maps using VOSviewer. RESULTS: A total of 2330 biosimilar-related documents identified in the Scopus database, most of them were articles (1452; 62.32%). The number of documents published had an exponential increased between 2004 and 2016 (p < 0.001). The United States was the country with the highest production with 685 (29.40%) documents followed by Germany and UK with 293 (12.58%) and 248 (10.64%), respectively. Switzerland (11.05), Netherlands (5.85) and UK (3.83) showed the highest per capita ratio. The highest citation/article ratio were for the Netherlands (28.06), Spain (24.23), and France (20.11). Gabi Journal published 73 (3.13%) documents; both Biopharm International and Pharmaceutical Technology and Mabs, 41 (1.76%). Three out of top ten journals were Trade publications. Amgen Incorporated from the USA was the most prolific institution with 51 documents followed by Pfizer Inc. with 48. Terms about specific diseases and drugs were found in recent years, compared with terms such as legislation, structure, protein, dose and generic in the early years. CONCLUSIONS: Research production and publication of documents on biosimilars are increasing. The majority of publications came from high-income countries. The trends in terminology use are according to state of the art in the topic, and reflects the interest in the utilization of biosimilars in diseases who are expected to obtain benefits of its use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870206/ /pubmed/29599984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hernández-Vásquez, Akram
Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A.
Bendezu-Quispe, Guido
Comandé, Daniel
Rosselli, Diego
A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title_full A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title_short A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
title_sort bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezvasquezakram abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT alarconruizchristopera abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT bendezuquispeguido abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT comandedaniel abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT rossellidiego abibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT hernandezvasquezakram bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT alarconruizchristopera bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT bendezuquispeguido bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT comandedaniel bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars
AT rossellidiego bibliometricanalysisoftheglobalresearchonbiosimilars