Cargando…

Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine

Pressure application to the lumbar spine is an important assessment and treatment method of low back pain. However, few studies have characterized brain activation patterns in response to mechanical pressure. The objective of this study was to map brain activation associated with various levels of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansour, Zaid M., Martin, Laura E., Lepping, Rebecca J., Kanaan, Saddam F., Brooks, William M., Yeh, Hung-Wen, Sharma, Neena K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8030041
_version_ 1783309464742395904
author Mansour, Zaid M.
Martin, Laura E.
Lepping, Rebecca J.
Kanaan, Saddam F.
Brooks, William M.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Sharma, Neena K.
author_facet Mansour, Zaid M.
Martin, Laura E.
Lepping, Rebecca J.
Kanaan, Saddam F.
Brooks, William M.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Sharma, Neena K.
author_sort Mansour, Zaid M.
collection PubMed
description Pressure application to the lumbar spine is an important assessment and treatment method of low back pain. However, few studies have characterized brain activation patterns in response to mechanical pressure. The objective of this study was to map brain activation associated with various levels of mechanical pressure to the lumbar spine in healthy subjects. Fifteen healthy subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning while mechanical pressure was applied to their lumbar spine with a custom-made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible pressure device. Each subject received three levels of pressure (low/medium/high) based on subjective ratings determined prior to the scan using a block design (pressure/rest). Pressure rating was assessed with an 11-point scale (0 = no touch; 10 = max pain-free pressure). Brain activation differences between pressure levels and rest were analyzed. Subjective pressure ratings were significantly different across pressure levels (p < 0.05). The overall brain activation pattern was not different across pressure levels (all p > 0.05). However, the overall effect of pressure versus rest showed significant decreases in brain activation in response to the mechanical stimulus in regions associated with somatosensory processing including the precentral gyri, left hippocampus, left precuneus, left medial frontal gyrus, and left posterior cingulate. There was increase in brain activation in the right inferior parietal lobule and left cerebellum. This study offers insight into the neural mechanisms that may relate to manual mobilization intervention used for managing low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58703592018-03-27 Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine Mansour, Zaid M. Martin, Laura E. Lepping, Rebecca J. Kanaan, Saddam F. Brooks, William M. Yeh, Hung-Wen Sharma, Neena K. Brain Sci Article Pressure application to the lumbar spine is an important assessment and treatment method of low back pain. However, few studies have characterized brain activation patterns in response to mechanical pressure. The objective of this study was to map brain activation associated with various levels of mechanical pressure to the lumbar spine in healthy subjects. Fifteen healthy subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning while mechanical pressure was applied to their lumbar spine with a custom-made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible pressure device. Each subject received three levels of pressure (low/medium/high) based on subjective ratings determined prior to the scan using a block design (pressure/rest). Pressure rating was assessed with an 11-point scale (0 = no touch; 10 = max pain-free pressure). Brain activation differences between pressure levels and rest were analyzed. Subjective pressure ratings were significantly different across pressure levels (p < 0.05). The overall brain activation pattern was not different across pressure levels (all p > 0.05). However, the overall effect of pressure versus rest showed significant decreases in brain activation in response to the mechanical stimulus in regions associated with somatosensory processing including the precentral gyri, left hippocampus, left precuneus, left medial frontal gyrus, and left posterior cingulate. There was increase in brain activation in the right inferior parietal lobule and left cerebellum. This study offers insight into the neural mechanisms that may relate to manual mobilization intervention used for managing low back pain. MDPI 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5870359/ /pubmed/29494490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8030041 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mansour, Zaid M.
Martin, Laura E.
Lepping, Rebecca J.
Kanaan, Saddam F.
Brooks, William M.
Yeh, Hung-Wen
Sharma, Neena K.
Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title_full Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title_fullStr Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title_full_unstemmed Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title_short Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine
title_sort brain response to non-painful mechanical stimulus to lumbar spine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8030041
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourzaidm brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT martinlaurae brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT leppingrebeccaj brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT kanaansaddamf brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT brookswilliamm brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT yehhungwen brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine
AT sharmaneenak brainresponsetononpainfulmechanicalstimulustolumbarspine