Cargando…

Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND: The role of the “debrief” to address issues related to patient safety and systematic flaws in care is frequently overlooked. In our study, we interview surgical leaders who have developed successful strategies of debriefing within a comprehensive program of quality improvement. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brindle, Mary E., Henrich, Natalie, Foster, Andrew, Marks, Stanley, Rose, Michael, Welsh, Robert, Berry, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3003-3
_version_ 1783309471291801600
author Brindle, Mary E.
Henrich, Natalie
Foster, Andrew
Marks, Stanley
Rose, Michael
Welsh, Robert
Berry, William
author_facet Brindle, Mary E.
Henrich, Natalie
Foster, Andrew
Marks, Stanley
Rose, Michael
Welsh, Robert
Berry, William
author_sort Brindle, Mary E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of the “debrief” to address issues related to patient safety and systematic flaws in care is frequently overlooked. In our study, we interview surgical leaders who have developed successful strategies of debriefing within a comprehensive program of quality improvement. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of four implementation leaders were performed. The observations, beliefs and strategies of surgical leaders are compared and contrasted. Common themes are identified related to program success and failure. Quality and safety researchers performed, coded and categorized the interviews and coordinated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The authors from the four institutions aided in interpretation and framing of the results. RESULTS: The debriefing programs evaluated were part of comprehensive quality improvement projects. Seven high-level themes and 24 subthemes were identified from the interviews. Themes related to leadership included early engagement, visible ongoing commitment and enforcement. Success appeared to depend upon meaningful and early debriefing feedback. The culture of safety that promoted success included a commitment to open and fair communication and continuous improvement. There were many challenges to the success of debriefing programs. The loss of institutional commitment of resources and personnel was the instigating factor behind the collapse of the program at Michigan. Other areas of potential failure included communication issues and loss of early and meaningful feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders of four surgical systems with strong debriefing programs report success using debriefing to improve system performance. These findings are consistent with previously published studies. Success requires commitment of resources, and leadership engagement. The greatest gains may be best achieved by programs that provide meaningful debriefing feedback in an atmosphere dedicated to open communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58703862018-03-29 Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis Brindle, Mary E. Henrich, Natalie Foster, Andrew Marks, Stanley Rose, Michael Welsh, Robert Berry, William BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The role of the “debrief” to address issues related to patient safety and systematic flaws in care is frequently overlooked. In our study, we interview surgical leaders who have developed successful strategies of debriefing within a comprehensive program of quality improvement. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of four implementation leaders were performed. The observations, beliefs and strategies of surgical leaders are compared and contrasted. Common themes are identified related to program success and failure. Quality and safety researchers performed, coded and categorized the interviews and coordinated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The authors from the four institutions aided in interpretation and framing of the results. RESULTS: The debriefing programs evaluated were part of comprehensive quality improvement projects. Seven high-level themes and 24 subthemes were identified from the interviews. Themes related to leadership included early engagement, visible ongoing commitment and enforcement. Success appeared to depend upon meaningful and early debriefing feedback. The culture of safety that promoted success included a commitment to open and fair communication and continuous improvement. There were many challenges to the success of debriefing programs. The loss of institutional commitment of resources and personnel was the instigating factor behind the collapse of the program at Michigan. Other areas of potential failure included communication issues and loss of early and meaningful feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders of four surgical systems with strong debriefing programs report success using debriefing to improve system performance. These findings are consistent with previously published studies. Success requires commitment of resources, and leadership engagement. The greatest gains may be best achieved by programs that provide meaningful debriefing feedback in an atmosphere dedicated to open communication. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870386/ /pubmed/29580254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3003-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brindle, Mary E.
Henrich, Natalie
Foster, Andrew
Marks, Stanley
Rose, Michael
Welsh, Robert
Berry, William
Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title_full Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title_short Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
title_sort implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3003-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brindlemarye implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT henrichnatalie implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT fosterandrew implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT marksstanley implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT rosemichael implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT welshrobert implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis
AT berrywilliam implementationofsurgicaldebriefingprogramsinlargehealthsystemsanexploratoryqualitativeanalysis