Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
OBJECTIVES: Exposing children to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) causes significant harm and occurs predominantly through smoking by caregivers in the family home. We report a trial of a complex intervention designed to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children whose primary caregiver feels unable...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tobacco Control
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Exposing children to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) causes significant harm and occurs predominantly through smoking by caregivers in the family home. We report a trial of a complex intervention designed to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children whose primary caregiver feels unable or unwilling to quit smoking. DESIGN: An open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Deprived communities in Nottingham City and County, England PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers resident in Nottingham City and County in England who were at least 18 years old, the main caregiver of a child aged under 5 years living in their household, and reported that they were smoking tobacco inside their home. INTERVENTIONS: We compared a complex intervention combining personalised feedback on home air quality, behavioural support and nicotine replacement therapy for temporary abstinence with usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was change in air quality in the home, measured as average 16–24 hours levels of particulate matter of < 2.5 µm diameter (PM(2.5)), between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in maximum PM(2.5), proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded WHO recommended levels of maximum exposure of 25 µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine, caregivers’ cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence, determination to stop smoking, quit attempts and quitting altogether during the intervention. RESULTS: Arithmetic mean PM(2.5) decreased significantly more (by 35.2 %; 95% CI 12.7% to 51.9 %) in intervention than in usual care households, as did the proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded 25 µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine concentrations, caregivers’ cigarette consumption in the home, nicotine dependence, determination to quit and likelihood of having made a quit attempt. CONCLUSIONS: By reducing exposure to SHS in the homes of children who live with smokers unable or unwilling to quit, this intervention offers huge potential to reduce children’s’ tobacco-related harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN81701383. This trial was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR): RP-PG-0608-10020 |
---|