Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home

OBJECTIVES: Exposing children to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) causes significant harm and occurs predominantly through smoking by caregivers in the family home. We report a trial of a complex intervention designed to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children whose primary caregiver feels unable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratschen, Elena, Thorley, Rebecca, Jones, Laura, Opazo Breton, Magdalena, Cook, Juliette, McNeill, Ann, Britton, John, Coleman, Tim, Lewis, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tobacco Control 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279
_version_ 1783309482630053888
author Ratschen, Elena
Thorley, Rebecca
Jones, Laura
Opazo Breton, Magdalena
Cook, Juliette
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Coleman, Tim
Lewis, Sarah
author_facet Ratschen, Elena
Thorley, Rebecca
Jones, Laura
Opazo Breton, Magdalena
Cook, Juliette
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Coleman, Tim
Lewis, Sarah
author_sort Ratschen, Elena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Exposing children to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) causes significant harm and occurs predominantly through smoking by caregivers in the family home. We report a trial of a complex intervention designed to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children whose primary caregiver feels unable or unwilling to quit smoking. DESIGN: An open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Deprived communities in Nottingham City and County, England PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers resident in Nottingham City and County in England who were at least 18 years old, the main caregiver of a child aged under 5 years living in their household, and reported that they were smoking tobacco inside their home. INTERVENTIONS: We compared a complex intervention combining personalised feedback on home air quality, behavioural support and nicotine replacement therapy for temporary abstinence with usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was change in air quality in the home, measured as average 16–24  hours levels of particulate matter of  < 2.5  µm diameter (PM(2.5)), between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in maximum PM(2.5), proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded WHO recommended levels of maximum exposure of 25  µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine, caregivers’ cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence, determination to stop smoking, quit attempts and quitting altogether during the intervention. RESULTS: Arithmetic mean PM(2.5) decreased significantly more (by 35.2 %; 95%  CI 12.7% to 51.9 %) in intervention than in usual care households, as did the proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded 25  µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine concentrations, caregivers’ cigarette consumption in the home, nicotine dependence, determination to quit and likelihood of having made a quit attempt. CONCLUSIONS: By reducing exposure to SHS in the homes of children who live with smokers unable or unwilling to quit, this intervention offers huge potential to reduce children’s’ tobacco-related harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN81701383. This trial was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR): RP-PG-0608-10020
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tobacco Control
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58704422018-03-28 A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home Ratschen, Elena Thorley, Rebecca Jones, Laura Opazo Breton, Magdalena Cook, Juliette McNeill, Ann Britton, John Coleman, Tim Lewis, Sarah Tob Control Research Paper OBJECTIVES: Exposing children to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) causes significant harm and occurs predominantly through smoking by caregivers in the family home. We report a trial of a complex intervention designed to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children whose primary caregiver feels unable or unwilling to quit smoking. DESIGN: An open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Deprived communities in Nottingham City and County, England PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers resident in Nottingham City and County in England who were at least 18 years old, the main caregiver of a child aged under 5 years living in their household, and reported that they were smoking tobacco inside their home. INTERVENTIONS: We compared a complex intervention combining personalised feedback on home air quality, behavioural support and nicotine replacement therapy for temporary abstinence with usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was change in air quality in the home, measured as average 16–24  hours levels of particulate matter of  < 2.5  µm diameter (PM(2.5)), between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in maximum PM(2.5), proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded WHO recommended levels of maximum exposure of 25  µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine, caregivers’ cigarette consumption, nicotine dependence, determination to stop smoking, quit attempts and quitting altogether during the intervention. RESULTS: Arithmetic mean PM(2.5) decreased significantly more (by 35.2 %; 95%  CI 12.7% to 51.9 %) in intervention than in usual care households, as did the proportion of time PM(2.5) exceeded 25  µg/mg(3), child salivary cotinine concentrations, caregivers’ cigarette consumption in the home, nicotine dependence, determination to quit and likelihood of having made a quit attempt. CONCLUSIONS: By reducing exposure to SHS in the homes of children who live with smokers unable or unwilling to quit, this intervention offers huge potential to reduce children’s’ tobacco-related harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN81701383. This trial was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR): RP-PG-0608-10020 Tobacco Control 2018-03 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5870442/ /pubmed/28432210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ratschen, Elena
Thorley, Rebecca
Jones, Laura
Opazo Breton, Magdalena
Cook, Juliette
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Coleman, Tim
Lewis, Sarah
A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title_full A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title_short A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
title_sort randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to secondhand smoke in the home
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279
work_keys_str_mv AT ratschenelena arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT thorleyrebecca arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT joneslaura arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT opazobretonmagdalena arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT cookjuliette arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT mcneillann arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT brittonjohn arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT colemantim arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT lewissarah arandomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT ratschenelena randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT thorleyrebecca randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT joneslaura randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT opazobretonmagdalena randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT cookjuliette randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT mcneillann randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT brittonjohn randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT colemantim randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome
AT lewissarah randomisedcontrolledtrialofacomplexinterventiontoreducechildrensexposuretosecondhandsmokeinthehome