Cargando…

Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?

BACKGROUND: Resection of proximal fibular osteosarcoma involving the posteromedial aspect of the fibula is challenging. Reconstruction using a gastrocnemius flap may result in significant lateral instability and abnormal knee movement. Furthermore, postoperative gait may be disturbed by foot drop re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan, Jun, Zhang, Can, He, Hong-bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1364-z
_version_ 1783309562764328960
author Wan, Jun
Zhang, Can
He, Hong-bo
author_facet Wan, Jun
Zhang, Can
He, Hong-bo
author_sort Wan, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resection of proximal fibular osteosarcoma involving the posteromedial aspect of the fibula is challenging. Reconstruction using a gastrocnemius flap may result in significant lateral instability and abnormal knee movement. Furthermore, postoperative gait may be disturbed by foot drop resulting from scarification of the common peroneal nerve. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2013, five patients with proximal fibular osteosarcoma were treated via the double-approach procedure using en bloc resection without a gastrocnemius flap. Simultaneously, all patients received one-stage tenodesis of the anterior tibial and toe extensor tendons. Clinical outcomes, including local tumor recurrence, complications, and functional outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 47.2 months (range 42–52 months). No patients experienced local recurrence. The patients’ Enneking functional scores were excellent (80%) or good (20%) at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal fibular osteosarcoma, the double-approach procedure allows easier and safer en bloc tumor resection with vessel and nerve protection. One-stage tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap is associated with good functional outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-018-1364-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5870917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58709172018-04-02 Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma? Wan, Jun Zhang, Can He, Hong-bo World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Resection of proximal fibular osteosarcoma involving the posteromedial aspect of the fibula is challenging. Reconstruction using a gastrocnemius flap may result in significant lateral instability and abnormal knee movement. Furthermore, postoperative gait may be disturbed by foot drop resulting from scarification of the common peroneal nerve. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2013, five patients with proximal fibular osteosarcoma were treated via the double-approach procedure using en bloc resection without a gastrocnemius flap. Simultaneously, all patients received one-stage tenodesis of the anterior tibial and toe extensor tendons. Clinical outcomes, including local tumor recurrence, complications, and functional outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 47.2 months (range 42–52 months). No patients experienced local recurrence. The patients’ Enneking functional scores were excellent (80%) or good (20%) at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal fibular osteosarcoma, the double-approach procedure allows easier and safer en bloc tumor resection with vessel and nerve protection. One-stage tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap is associated with good functional outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-018-1364-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5870917/ /pubmed/29580239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1364-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wan, Jun
Zhang, Can
He, Hong-bo
Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title_full Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title_fullStr Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title_full_unstemmed Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title_short Is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
title_sort is double-approach surgery and tenodesis without a gastrocnemius flap better for dealing with proximal fibular osteosarcoma?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1364-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wanjun isdoubleapproachsurgeryandtenodesiswithoutagastrocnemiusflapbetterfordealingwithproximalfibularosteosarcoma
AT zhangcan isdoubleapproachsurgeryandtenodesiswithoutagastrocnemiusflapbetterfordealingwithproximalfibularosteosarcoma
AT hehongbo isdoubleapproachsurgeryandtenodesiswithoutagastrocnemiusflapbetterfordealingwithproximalfibularosteosarcoma