Cargando…

Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiraki, Takayuki, Kuroda, Hajime, Takada, Atsuko, Nakazato, Yoshimasa, Kubota, Keiichi, Imai, Yasuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5871828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332
_version_ 1783309706179117056
author Shiraki, Takayuki
Kuroda, Hajime
Takada, Atsuko
Nakazato, Yoshimasa
Kubota, Keiichi
Imai, Yasuo
author_facet Shiraki, Takayuki
Kuroda, Hajime
Takada, Atsuko
Nakazato, Yoshimasa
Kubota, Keiichi
Imai, Yasuo
author_sort Shiraki, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct margins was performed. They consisted of 40 distant and 34 perihilar CCAs (45 and 55 bile duct margins, respectively). The diagnosis was classified into three categories: negative, borderline (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia-1 and 2, and indefinite for neoplasia), or positive. FSD in the epithelial layer, subepithelial layer, and total layer was compared with corresponding permanent section diagnosis (PSD) postoperatively. Then, association between FSD and local recurrence was analyzed with special reference to borderline. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 duct margins revealed that concordance rate between FSD and PSD was 68.0% in the total layer, 69.0% in the epithelial layer, and 98.0% in the subepithelial layer. The extent of remaining biliary epithelium was comparable between FSD and PSD, and more than half of the margins lost > 50% of the entire epithelium, suggesting low quality of the samples. In FSD, the rate of negative margins decreased and that of borderline and positive margins increased according to the extent of the remaining epithelium. Diagnostic discordance between FSD and PSD was observed in 31 epithelial layers and two subepithelial layers. Alteration from borderline to negative was the most frequent (20 of the 31 epithelial layers). Patients with positive margin in the total and epithelial layers by FSD demonstrated a significantly worse local recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with patients with borderline and negative margins, which revealed comparable local RFS. Patients with borderline and negative margins in the epithelial layer by PSD also revealed comparable local RFS. These results suggested that epithelial borderline might be regarded substantially as negative. When classifying the status of the epithelial layer either as negative or positive, concordance rates between FSD and PSD in the total, epithelial, and subepithelial layers were 95.0%, 93.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: During intraoperative assessment of bile duct margin, borderline in the epithelial layer can be substantially regarded as negative, under which condition FSD is comparable to PSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5871828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58718282018-03-29 Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Shiraki, Takayuki Kuroda, Hajime Takada, Atsuko Nakazato, Yoshimasa Kubota, Keiichi Imai, Yasuo World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct margins was performed. They consisted of 40 distant and 34 perihilar CCAs (45 and 55 bile duct margins, respectively). The diagnosis was classified into three categories: negative, borderline (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia-1 and 2, and indefinite for neoplasia), or positive. FSD in the epithelial layer, subepithelial layer, and total layer was compared with corresponding permanent section diagnosis (PSD) postoperatively. Then, association between FSD and local recurrence was analyzed with special reference to borderline. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 duct margins revealed that concordance rate between FSD and PSD was 68.0% in the total layer, 69.0% in the epithelial layer, and 98.0% in the subepithelial layer. The extent of remaining biliary epithelium was comparable between FSD and PSD, and more than half of the margins lost > 50% of the entire epithelium, suggesting low quality of the samples. In FSD, the rate of negative margins decreased and that of borderline and positive margins increased according to the extent of the remaining epithelium. Diagnostic discordance between FSD and PSD was observed in 31 epithelial layers and two subepithelial layers. Alteration from borderline to negative was the most frequent (20 of the 31 epithelial layers). Patients with positive margin in the total and epithelial layers by FSD demonstrated a significantly worse local recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with patients with borderline and negative margins, which revealed comparable local RFS. Patients with borderline and negative margins in the epithelial layer by PSD also revealed comparable local RFS. These results suggested that epithelial borderline might be regarded substantially as negative. When classifying the status of the epithelial layer either as negative or positive, concordance rates between FSD and PSD in the total, epithelial, and subepithelial layers were 95.0%, 93.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: During intraoperative assessment of bile duct margin, borderline in the epithelial layer can be substantially regarded as negative, under which condition FSD is comparable to PSD. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-03-28 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5871828/ /pubmed/29599608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Shiraki, Takayuki
Kuroda, Hajime
Takada, Atsuko
Nakazato, Yoshimasa
Kubota, Keiichi
Imai, Yasuo
Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5871828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332
work_keys_str_mv AT shirakitakayuki intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT kurodahajime intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT takadaatsuko intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT nakazatoyoshimasa intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT kubotakeiichi intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT imaiyasuo intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma