Cargando…
Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5871828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332 |
_version_ | 1783309706179117056 |
---|---|
author | Shiraki, Takayuki Kuroda, Hajime Takada, Atsuko Nakazato, Yoshimasa Kubota, Keiichi Imai, Yasuo |
author_facet | Shiraki, Takayuki Kuroda, Hajime Takada, Atsuko Nakazato, Yoshimasa Kubota, Keiichi Imai, Yasuo |
author_sort | Shiraki, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct margins was performed. They consisted of 40 distant and 34 perihilar CCAs (45 and 55 bile duct margins, respectively). The diagnosis was classified into three categories: negative, borderline (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia-1 and 2, and indefinite for neoplasia), or positive. FSD in the epithelial layer, subepithelial layer, and total layer was compared with corresponding permanent section diagnosis (PSD) postoperatively. Then, association between FSD and local recurrence was analyzed with special reference to borderline. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 duct margins revealed that concordance rate between FSD and PSD was 68.0% in the total layer, 69.0% in the epithelial layer, and 98.0% in the subepithelial layer. The extent of remaining biliary epithelium was comparable between FSD and PSD, and more than half of the margins lost > 50% of the entire epithelium, suggesting low quality of the samples. In FSD, the rate of negative margins decreased and that of borderline and positive margins increased according to the extent of the remaining epithelium. Diagnostic discordance between FSD and PSD was observed in 31 epithelial layers and two subepithelial layers. Alteration from borderline to negative was the most frequent (20 of the 31 epithelial layers). Patients with positive margin in the total and epithelial layers by FSD demonstrated a significantly worse local recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with patients with borderline and negative margins, which revealed comparable local RFS. Patients with borderline and negative margins in the epithelial layer by PSD also revealed comparable local RFS. These results suggested that epithelial borderline might be regarded substantially as negative. When classifying the status of the epithelial layer either as negative or positive, concordance rates between FSD and PSD in the total, epithelial, and subepithelial layers were 95.0%, 93.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: During intraoperative assessment of bile duct margin, borderline in the epithelial layer can be substantially regarded as negative, under which condition FSD is comparable to PSD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5871828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58718282018-03-29 Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Shiraki, Takayuki Kuroda, Hajime Takada, Atsuko Nakazato, Yoshimasa Kubota, Keiichi Imai, Yasuo World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of frozen section diagnosis (FSD) of bile duct margins during surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 74 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for extrahepatic CCA from 2012 to 2017, during which FSD of bile duct margins was performed. They consisted of 40 distant and 34 perihilar CCAs (45 and 55 bile duct margins, respectively). The diagnosis was classified into three categories: negative, borderline (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia-1 and 2, and indefinite for neoplasia), or positive. FSD in the epithelial layer, subepithelial layer, and total layer was compared with corresponding permanent section diagnosis (PSD) postoperatively. Then, association between FSD and local recurrence was analyzed with special reference to borderline. RESULTS: Analysis of 100 duct margins revealed that concordance rate between FSD and PSD was 68.0% in the total layer, 69.0% in the epithelial layer, and 98.0% in the subepithelial layer. The extent of remaining biliary epithelium was comparable between FSD and PSD, and more than half of the margins lost > 50% of the entire epithelium, suggesting low quality of the samples. In FSD, the rate of negative margins decreased and that of borderline and positive margins increased according to the extent of the remaining epithelium. Diagnostic discordance between FSD and PSD was observed in 31 epithelial layers and two subepithelial layers. Alteration from borderline to negative was the most frequent (20 of the 31 epithelial layers). Patients with positive margin in the total and epithelial layers by FSD demonstrated a significantly worse local recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with patients with borderline and negative margins, which revealed comparable local RFS. Patients with borderline and negative margins in the epithelial layer by PSD also revealed comparable local RFS. These results suggested that epithelial borderline might be regarded substantially as negative. When classifying the status of the epithelial layer either as negative or positive, concordance rates between FSD and PSD in the total, epithelial, and subepithelial layers were 95.0%, 93.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: During intraoperative assessment of bile duct margin, borderline in the epithelial layer can be substantially regarded as negative, under which condition FSD is comparable to PSD. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-03-28 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5871828/ /pubmed/29599608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Shiraki, Takayuki Kuroda, Hajime Takada, Atsuko Nakazato, Yoshimasa Kubota, Keiichi Imai, Yasuo Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5871828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirakitakayuki intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT kurodahajime intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT takadaatsuko intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT nakazatoyoshimasa intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT kubotakeiichi intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT imaiyasuo intraoperativefrozensectiondiagnosisofbileductmarginforextrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma |