Cargando…
Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018 |
_version_ | 1783309764879450112 |
---|---|
author | Steffi, Chris Shi, Zhilong Kong, Chee Hoe Wang, Wilson |
author_facet | Steffi, Chris Shi, Zhilong Kong, Chee Hoe Wang, Wilson |
author_sort | Steffi, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development. This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers. Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis. For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation. In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity. In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions. Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity. Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis. Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity. Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5872104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58721042018-03-30 Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials Steffi, Chris Shi, Zhilong Kong, Chee Hoe Wang, Wilson J Funct Biomater Review Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development. This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers. Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis. For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation. In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity. In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions. Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity. Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis. Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity. Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone. MDPI 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5872104/ /pubmed/29495358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Steffi, Chris Shi, Zhilong Kong, Chee Hoe Wang, Wilson Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title | Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title_full | Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title_fullStr | Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title_short | Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials |
title_sort | modulation of osteoclast interactions with orthopaedic biomaterials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steffichris modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials AT shizhilong modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials AT kongcheehoe modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials AT wangwilson modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials |