Cargando…

Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials

Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steffi, Chris, Shi, Zhilong, Kong, Chee Hoe, Wang, Wilson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018
_version_ 1783309764879450112
author Steffi, Chris
Shi, Zhilong
Kong, Chee Hoe
Wang, Wilson
author_facet Steffi, Chris
Shi, Zhilong
Kong, Chee Hoe
Wang, Wilson
author_sort Steffi, Chris
collection PubMed
description Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development. This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers. Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis. For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation. In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity. In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions. Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity. Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis. Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity. Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58721042018-03-30 Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials Steffi, Chris Shi, Zhilong Kong, Chee Hoe Wang, Wilson J Funct Biomater Review Biomaterial integration in bone depends on bone remodelling at the bone-implant interface. Optimal balance of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone deposition by osteoblasts is crucial for successful implantation, especially in orthopaedic surgery. Most studies examined osteoblast differentiation on biomaterials, yet few research has been conducted to explore the effect of different orthopaedic implants on osteoclast development. This review covers, in detail, the biology of osteoclasts, in vitro models of osteoclasts, and modulation of osteoclast activity by different implant surfaces, bio-ceramics, and polymers. Studies show that surface topography influence osteoclastogenesis. For instance, metal implants with rough surfaces enhanced osteoclast activity, while smooth surfaces resulted in poor osteoclast differentiation. In addition, surface modification of implants with anti-osteoporotic drug further decreased osteoclast activity. In bioceramics, osteoclast development depended on different chemical compositions. Strontium-incorporated bioceramics decreased osteoclast development, whereas higher concentrations of silica enhanced osteoclast activity. Differences between natural and synthetic polymers also modulated osteoclastogenesis. Physiochemical properties of implants affect osteoclast activity. Hence, understanding osteoclast biology and its response to the natural microarchitecture of bone are indispensable to design suitable implant interfaces and scaffolds, which will stimulate osteoclasts in ways similar to that of native bone. MDPI 2018-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5872104/ /pubmed/29495358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Steffi, Chris
Shi, Zhilong
Kong, Chee Hoe
Wang, Wilson
Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title_full Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title_fullStr Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title_short Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials
title_sort modulation of osteoclast interactions with orthopaedic biomaterials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010018
work_keys_str_mv AT steffichris modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials
AT shizhilong modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials
AT kongcheehoe modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials
AT wangwilson modulationofosteoclastinteractionswithorthopaedicbiomaterials