Cargando…

Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers

BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Page, Cécile, Rahimi, Kurosh, Köbel, Martin, Tonin, Patricia N., Meunier, Liliane, Portelance, Lise, Bernard, Monique, Nelson, Brad H., Bernardini, Marcus Q., Bartlett, John M. S., Bachvarov, Dimcho, Gotlieb, Walter H., Gilks, Blake, McAlpine, Jessica N., Nachtigal, Mark W., Piché, Alain, Watson, Peter H., Vanderhyden, Barbara, Huntsman, David G., Provencher, Diane M., Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8
_version_ 1783309856575324160
author Le Page, Cécile
Rahimi, Kurosh
Köbel, Martin
Tonin, Patricia N.
Meunier, Liliane
Portelance, Lise
Bernard, Monique
Nelson, Brad H.
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Bartlett, John M. S.
Bachvarov, Dimcho
Gotlieb, Walter H.
Gilks, Blake
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Nachtigal, Mark W.
Piché, Alain
Watson, Peter H.
Vanderhyden, Barbara
Huntsman, David G.
Provencher, Diane M.
Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
author_facet Le Page, Cécile
Rahimi, Kurosh
Köbel, Martin
Tonin, Patricia N.
Meunier, Liliane
Portelance, Lise
Bernard, Monique
Nelson, Brad H.
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Bartlett, John M. S.
Bachvarov, Dimcho
Gotlieb, Walter H.
Gilks, Blake
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Nachtigal, Mark W.
Piché, Alain
Watson, Peter H.
Vanderhyden, Barbara
Huntsman, David G.
Provencher, Diane M.
Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
author_sort Le Page, Cécile
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort. METHODS: With support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58725292018-04-02 Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers Le Page, Cécile Rahimi, Kurosh Köbel, Martin Tonin, Patricia N. Meunier, Liliane Portelance, Lise Bernard, Monique Nelson, Brad H. Bernardini, Marcus Q. Bartlett, John M. S. Bachvarov, Dimcho Gotlieb, Walter H. Gilks, Blake McAlpine, Jessica N. Nachtigal, Mark W. Piché, Alain Watson, Peter H. Vanderhyden, Barbara Huntsman, David G. Provencher, Diane M. Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort. METHODS: With support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5872529/ /pubmed/29587661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Page, Cécile
Rahimi, Kurosh
Köbel, Martin
Tonin, Patricia N.
Meunier, Liliane
Portelance, Lise
Bernard, Monique
Nelson, Brad H.
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Bartlett, John M. S.
Bachvarov, Dimcho
Gotlieb, Walter H.
Gilks, Blake
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Nachtigal, Mark W.
Piché, Alain
Watson, Peter H.
Vanderhyden, Barbara
Huntsman, David G.
Provencher, Diane M.
Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title_full Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title_fullStr Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title_short Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
title_sort characteristics and outcome of the coeur canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lepagececile characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT rahimikurosh characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT kobelmartin characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT toninpatrician characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT meunierliliane characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT portelancelise characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT bernardmonique characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT nelsonbradh characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT bernardinimarcusq characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT bartlettjohnms characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT bachvarovdimcho characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT gotliebwalterh characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT gilksblake characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT mcalpinejessican characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT nachtigalmarkw characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT pichealain characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT watsonpeterh characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT vanderhydenbarbara characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT huntsmandavidg characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT provencherdianem characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers
AT mesmassonannemarie characteristicsandoutcomeofthecoeurcanadianvalidationcohortforovariancancerbiomarkers