Cargando…

Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany

BACKGROUND: As no current data are available on the prevalence of leptospiral infection in swine in Germany, we analysed laboratory data from diagnostic examinations carried out on samples from swine all over Germany from January 2011 to September 2016. A total of 29,829 swine sera were tested by mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin, Tschentscher, Astrid, Beyerbach, Martin, Homuth, Matthias, Kreienbrock, Lothar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0086-5
_version_ 1783309858458566656
author Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin
Tschentscher, Astrid
Beyerbach, Martin
Homuth, Matthias
Kreienbrock, Lothar
author_facet Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin
Tschentscher, Astrid
Beyerbach, Martin
Homuth, Matthias
Kreienbrock, Lothar
author_sort Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As no current data are available on the prevalence of leptospiral infection in swine in Germany, we analysed laboratory data from diagnostic examinations carried out on samples from swine all over Germany from January 2011 to September 2016. A total of 29,829 swine sera were tested by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) for antibodies against strains of eleven Leptospira serovars. RESULTS: Overall, 20.2% (6025) of the total sample collection tested positive for leptospiral infection. Seropositivity ranged between 16.3% (964) in 2011 and 30.9% (941) in 2016 (January to September only). Of all samples, 11.6% (57.3% of the positives) reacted with only one Leptospira serovar, and only 8.6% (42.7% of the positives) reacted simultaneously with two or more serovars. The most frequently detected serovar was Bratislava, which was found in 11.6% (3448) of all samples, followed by the serovars Australis in 7.3% (2185), Icterohaemorrhagiae in 4.0% (1191), Copenhageni in 4.0% (1182), Autumnalis in 3.7% (1054), Canicola in 2.0% (585), and Pomona in 1.2% (368). Modelling shows that both the year and the reason for testing at the laboratory had statistically strong effects on the test results; however, no interactions were determined between those factors. The results support the suggestion that the seropositivities found may be considered to indicate the state of leptospiral infections in the German swine population. CONCLUSION: Although data from passive surveillance are prone to selection bias, stratified analysis by initial reason for examination and analyses by model approaches may correct for biases. A prevalence of about 20% for a leptospiral infection is most probable for sows with reproductive problems in Germany, with an increasing trend. Swine in Germany are probably a reservoir host for serovar Bratislava, but in contrast to other studies not for Pomona and Tarassovi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58725372018-04-02 Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin Tschentscher, Astrid Beyerbach, Martin Homuth, Matthias Kreienbrock, Lothar Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: As no current data are available on the prevalence of leptospiral infection in swine in Germany, we analysed laboratory data from diagnostic examinations carried out on samples from swine all over Germany from January 2011 to September 2016. A total of 29,829 swine sera were tested by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) for antibodies against strains of eleven Leptospira serovars. RESULTS: Overall, 20.2% (6025) of the total sample collection tested positive for leptospiral infection. Seropositivity ranged between 16.3% (964) in 2011 and 30.9% (941) in 2016 (January to September only). Of all samples, 11.6% (57.3% of the positives) reacted with only one Leptospira serovar, and only 8.6% (42.7% of the positives) reacted simultaneously with two or more serovars. The most frequently detected serovar was Bratislava, which was found in 11.6% (3448) of all samples, followed by the serovars Australis in 7.3% (2185), Icterohaemorrhagiae in 4.0% (1191), Copenhageni in 4.0% (1182), Autumnalis in 3.7% (1054), Canicola in 2.0% (585), and Pomona in 1.2% (368). Modelling shows that both the year and the reason for testing at the laboratory had statistically strong effects on the test results; however, no interactions were determined between those factors. The results support the suggestion that the seropositivities found may be considered to indicate the state of leptospiral infections in the German swine population. CONCLUSION: Although data from passive surveillance are prone to selection bias, stratified analysis by initial reason for examination and analyses by model approaches may correct for biases. A prevalence of about 20% for a leptospiral infection is most probable for sows with reproductive problems in Germany, with an increasing trend. Swine in Germany are probably a reservoir host for serovar Bratislava, but in contrast to other studies not for Pomona and Tarassovi. BioMed Central 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5872537/ /pubmed/29610674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0086-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin
Tschentscher, Astrid
Beyerbach, Martin
Homuth, Matthias
Kreienbrock, Lothar
Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title_full Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title_fullStr Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title_short Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany
title_sort passive surveillance of leptospira infection in swine in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0086-5
work_keys_str_mv AT strutzbergminderkatrin passivesurveillanceofleptospirainfectioninswineingermany
AT tschentscherastrid passivesurveillanceofleptospirainfectioninswineingermany
AT beyerbachmartin passivesurveillanceofleptospirainfectioninswineingermany
AT homuthmatthias passivesurveillanceofleptospirainfectioninswineingermany
AT kreienbrocklothar passivesurveillanceofleptospirainfectioninswineingermany