Cargando…

Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms

A fiber-optic probe-based instrument, designed for assessment of parameters related to microcirculation, red blood cell tissue fraction ([Formula: see text]), oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]), and speed resolved perfusion, has been evaluated using state-of-the-art tissue phantoms. The probe i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fredriksson, Ingemar, Saager, Rolf B., Durkin, Anthony J., Strömberg, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.115004
_version_ 1783309875595444224
author Fredriksson, Ingemar
Saager, Rolf B.
Durkin, Anthony J.
Strömberg, Tomas
author_facet Fredriksson, Ingemar
Saager, Rolf B.
Durkin, Anthony J.
Strömberg, Tomas
author_sort Fredriksson, Ingemar
collection PubMed
description A fiber-optic probe-based instrument, designed for assessment of parameters related to microcirculation, red blood cell tissue fraction ([Formula: see text]), oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]), and speed resolved perfusion, has been evaluated using state-of-the-art tissue phantoms. The probe integrates diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) at two source–detector separations and laser Doppler flowmetry, using an inverse Monte Carlo method for identifying the parameters of a multilayered tissue model. Here, we characterize the accuracy of the DRS aspect of the instrument using (1) liquid blood phantoms containing yeast and (2) epidermis-dermis mimicking solid-layered phantoms fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane, titanium oxide, hemoglobin, and coffee. The root-mean-square (RMS) deviations for [Formula: see text] for the two liquid phantoms were 11% and 5.3%, respectively, and 11% for the solid phantoms with highest hemoglobin signatures. The RMS deviation for [Formula: see text] was 5.2% and 2.9%, respectively, for the liquid phantoms, and 2.9% for the solid phantoms. RMS deviation for the reduced scattering coefficient ([Formula: see text]), for the solid phantoms was 15% (475 to 850 nm). For the liquid phantoms, the RMS deviation in average vessel diameter ([Formula: see text]) was [Formula: see text]. In conclusion, the skin microcirculation parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , as well as, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are estimated with reasonable accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58726202018-11-14 Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms Fredriksson, Ingemar Saager, Rolf B. Durkin, Anthony J. Strömberg, Tomas J Biomed Opt Research Papers: General A fiber-optic probe-based instrument, designed for assessment of parameters related to microcirculation, red blood cell tissue fraction ([Formula: see text]), oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]), and speed resolved perfusion, has been evaluated using state-of-the-art tissue phantoms. The probe integrates diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) at two source–detector separations and laser Doppler flowmetry, using an inverse Monte Carlo method for identifying the parameters of a multilayered tissue model. Here, we characterize the accuracy of the DRS aspect of the instrument using (1) liquid blood phantoms containing yeast and (2) epidermis-dermis mimicking solid-layered phantoms fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane, titanium oxide, hemoglobin, and coffee. The root-mean-square (RMS) deviations for [Formula: see text] for the two liquid phantoms were 11% and 5.3%, respectively, and 11% for the solid phantoms with highest hemoglobin signatures. The RMS deviation for [Formula: see text] was 5.2% and 2.9%, respectively, for the liquid phantoms, and 2.9% for the solid phantoms. RMS deviation for the reduced scattering coefficient ([Formula: see text]), for the solid phantoms was 15% (475 to 850 nm). For the liquid phantoms, the RMS deviation in average vessel diameter ([Formula: see text]) was [Formula: see text]. In conclusion, the skin microcirculation parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , as well as, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are estimated with reasonable accuracy. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2017-11-14 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5872620/ /pubmed/29139245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.115004 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Research Papers: General
Fredriksson, Ingemar
Saager, Rolf B.
Durkin, Anthony J.
Strömberg, Tomas
Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title_full Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title_fullStr Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title_short Evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
title_sort evaluation of a pointwise microcirculation assessment method using liquid and multilayered tissue simulating phantoms
topic Research Papers: General
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.115004
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikssoningemar evaluationofapointwisemicrocirculationassessmentmethodusingliquidandmultilayeredtissuesimulatingphantoms
AT saagerrolfb evaluationofapointwisemicrocirculationassessmentmethodusingliquidandmultilayeredtissuesimulatingphantoms
AT durkinanthonyj evaluationofapointwisemicrocirculationassessmentmethodusingliquidandmultilayeredtissuesimulatingphantoms
AT strombergtomas evaluationofapointwisemicrocirculationassessmentmethodusingliquidandmultilayeredtissuesimulatingphantoms