Cargando…

The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire

In order to better assess non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) consumption, measurement tools with greater utility are needed. The objective of this investigation is to determine the reproducibility and validity of a newly developed NNS food frequency questionnaire (NNS-FFQ) that measures five types of NNS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myers, Emily A., Passaro, Erin M., Hedrick, Valisa E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29534454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030334
_version_ 1783309906740248576
author Myers, Emily A.
Passaro, Erin M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
author_facet Myers, Emily A.
Passaro, Erin M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
author_sort Myers, Emily A.
collection PubMed
description In order to better assess non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) consumption, measurement tools with greater utility are needed. The objective of this investigation is to determine the reproducibility and validity of a newly developed NNS food frequency questionnaire (NNS-FFQ) that measures five types of NNS (saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose and erythritol). Adult participants (n = 123, 56% female, 75% Caucasian, mean age = 36.8 ± 16.6) completed the NNS-FFQ twice and had 24-h dietary recalls three times over a two-week study period. Reproducibility between two administrations of the NNS-FFQ was assessed via Bland–Altman plots, Spearman’s correlations (r(s)) and paired samples t-tests. Bland–Altman plots, Cohen’s κ, Spearman’s correlations (r(s)), and paired samples t-tests compared NNS intake between the two methods for validity. For reproducibility analyses, Bland–Altman analyses revealed agreement levels above the 95% acceptance level for total NNS (99.2%), erythritol (99.2%), and aspartame (96.7%). Agreement levels for acesulfame potassium (94.3%), saccharin (94.3%), and sucralose (94.3%) were slightly below the acceptable level. For validity analyses, Bland–Altman analyses revealed agreement levels above the 95% acceptance level for total NNS (95.1%), sucralose (95.9%), saccharin (95.9%), and erythritol (95.1%). Agreement levels for aspartame (94.3%) and acesulfame potassium (92.7%) were slightly below the acceptable level. Although less than desirable agreement was found between the methods for aspartame and acesulfame potassium, some variance was expected due to the habitual nature of the NNS-FFQ as compared to the recent intake reported by recalls. Within the context of this constraint, the NNS-FFQ demonstrates acceptable reproducibility and validity. The NNS-FFQ is a brief questionnaire that could be administered among diverse participants at the individual and population levels to measure habitual NNS intake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58727522018-03-30 The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire Myers, Emily A. Passaro, Erin M. Hedrick, Valisa E. Nutrients Article In order to better assess non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) consumption, measurement tools with greater utility are needed. The objective of this investigation is to determine the reproducibility and validity of a newly developed NNS food frequency questionnaire (NNS-FFQ) that measures five types of NNS (saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose and erythritol). Adult participants (n = 123, 56% female, 75% Caucasian, mean age = 36.8 ± 16.6) completed the NNS-FFQ twice and had 24-h dietary recalls three times over a two-week study period. Reproducibility between two administrations of the NNS-FFQ was assessed via Bland–Altman plots, Spearman’s correlations (r(s)) and paired samples t-tests. Bland–Altman plots, Cohen’s κ, Spearman’s correlations (r(s)), and paired samples t-tests compared NNS intake between the two methods for validity. For reproducibility analyses, Bland–Altman analyses revealed agreement levels above the 95% acceptance level for total NNS (99.2%), erythritol (99.2%), and aspartame (96.7%). Agreement levels for acesulfame potassium (94.3%), saccharin (94.3%), and sucralose (94.3%) were slightly below the acceptable level. For validity analyses, Bland–Altman analyses revealed agreement levels above the 95% acceptance level for total NNS (95.1%), sucralose (95.9%), saccharin (95.9%), and erythritol (95.1%). Agreement levels for aspartame (94.3%) and acesulfame potassium (92.7%) were slightly below the acceptable level. Although less than desirable agreement was found between the methods for aspartame and acesulfame potassium, some variance was expected due to the habitual nature of the NNS-FFQ as compared to the recent intake reported by recalls. Within the context of this constraint, the NNS-FFQ demonstrates acceptable reproducibility and validity. The NNS-FFQ is a brief questionnaire that could be administered among diverse participants at the individual and population levels to measure habitual NNS intake. MDPI 2018-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5872752/ /pubmed/29534454 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030334 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Myers, Emily A.
Passaro, Erin M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title_full The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title_fullStr The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title_short The Reproducibility and Comparative Validity of a Non-Nutritive Sweetener Food Frequency Questionnaire
title_sort reproducibility and comparative validity of a non-nutritive sweetener food frequency questionnaire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29534454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030334
work_keys_str_mv AT myersemilya thereproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire
AT passaroerinm thereproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire
AT hedrickvalisae thereproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire
AT myersemilya reproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire
AT passaroerinm reproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire
AT hedrickvalisae reproducibilityandcomparativevalidityofanonnutritivesweetenerfoodfrequencyquestionnaire