Cargando…

Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block

AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is very dynamic drug, used for analgesia, sedation, blunting the laryngoscopic responses and as adjuvants in regional anesthesia. Studies have shown that intravenous (iv) dexmedetomidine given during spinal anesthesia increases the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB). In this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vatsalya, Tripti, Waikar, Chandrakant, Singh, Madhurima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628580
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_111_17
_version_ 1783309924486348800
author Vatsalya, Tripti
Waikar, Chandrakant
Singh, Madhurima
author_facet Vatsalya, Tripti
Waikar, Chandrakant
Singh, Madhurima
author_sort Vatsalya, Tripti
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is very dynamic drug, used for analgesia, sedation, blunting the laryngoscopic responses and as adjuvants in regional anesthesia. Studies have shown that intravenous (iv) dexmedetomidine given during spinal anesthesia increases the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB). In this study, we compare the two iv regimen of dexmedetomidine on analgesic effect of spinal anesthesia. One is bolus dose of dexmedetomidine and other is infusion during the surgery, both given after induction of spinal anesthesia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients scheduled to undergo surgeries under SAB were randomly allocated into two groups namely B and I. After SAB with 3.0 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% heavy, Group B received 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine bolus over 15 min, Group I received 0.5 μg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine infusion until the end of surgery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: All parametric data were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test and nonparametric data analyzed using Chi-square test and Fischer exact test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS. RESULTS: Time to reach desired level T(10) was quick in Group B compared to Group I. Regression of sensory and motor was prolonged in Group I compared to Group B. Total duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group I 230.39 ± 16.20 compared to Group B 196.01 ± 14.32 and the difference is statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Both groups had Ramsay sedation score of 3 which lasted for 45 min in Group B while it was maintained in Group I. Side effects profile of both groups was comparable with few incidence of bradycardia and hypotension in both groups requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine after SAB results in prolonged analgesia than just a bolus dose. Therefore, we suggest use of the maintenance dose of iv dexmedetomidine after SAB for prolonging the duration and achieving adequate sedation
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58728622018-04-06 Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block Vatsalya, Tripti Waikar, Chandrakant Singh, Madhurima Anesth Essays Res Original Article AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is very dynamic drug, used for analgesia, sedation, blunting the laryngoscopic responses and as adjuvants in regional anesthesia. Studies have shown that intravenous (iv) dexmedetomidine given during spinal anesthesia increases the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB). In this study, we compare the two iv regimen of dexmedetomidine on analgesic effect of spinal anesthesia. One is bolus dose of dexmedetomidine and other is infusion during the surgery, both given after induction of spinal anesthesia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients scheduled to undergo surgeries under SAB were randomly allocated into two groups namely B and I. After SAB with 3.0 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% heavy, Group B received 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine bolus over 15 min, Group I received 0.5 μg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine infusion until the end of surgery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: All parametric data were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test and nonparametric data analyzed using Chi-square test and Fischer exact test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS. RESULTS: Time to reach desired level T(10) was quick in Group B compared to Group I. Regression of sensory and motor was prolonged in Group I compared to Group B. Total duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group I 230.39 ± 16.20 compared to Group B 196.01 ± 14.32 and the difference is statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Both groups had Ramsay sedation score of 3 which lasted for 45 min in Group B while it was maintained in Group I. Side effects profile of both groups was comparable with few incidence of bradycardia and hypotension in both groups requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine after SAB results in prolonged analgesia than just a bolus dose. Therefore, we suggest use of the maintenance dose of iv dexmedetomidine after SAB for prolonging the duration and achieving adequate sedation Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5872862/ /pubmed/29628580 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_111_17 Text en Copyright: 2018 © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vatsalya, Tripti
Waikar, Chandrakant
Singh, Madhurima
Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title_full Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title_fullStr Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title_short Comparison of Intravenous Bolus and Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Characteristics of Subarachnoid Block
title_sort comparison of intravenous bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine on characteristics of subarachnoid block
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628580
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_111_17
work_keys_str_mv AT vatsalyatripti comparisonofintravenousbolusandinfusionofdexmedetomidineoncharacteristicsofsubarachnoidblock
AT waikarchandrakant comparisonofintravenousbolusandinfusionofdexmedetomidineoncharacteristicsofsubarachnoidblock
AT singhmadhurima comparisonofintravenousbolusandinfusionofdexmedetomidineoncharacteristicsofsubarachnoidblock